{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1304458"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2014)103","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2014","description":"CERN-LHC. A search for supersymmetry (SUSY) in events with large missing transverse momentum, jets, at least one hadronically decaying tau lepton and zero or one additional light leptons (electron/muon), has been performed using 20.3 fb^-1 of proton-proton collision data at sqrt(s)=8 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. No excess above the Standard Model background expectation is observed in the various signal regions and 95% confidence level upper limits on the visible cross section for new phenomena are set. The results of the analysis are interpreted in several SUSY scenarios, significantly extending previous limits obtained in the same final states. In the framework of minimal gauge-mediated SUSY breaking models, values of the SUSY breaking scale Lambda below 63 TeV are excluded, independently of tan(beta). Exclusion limits are also derived for an mSUGRA/CMSSM model, in both the R-parity-conserving and R-parity-violating case. A further interpretation is presented in a framework of natural gauge mediation, in which the gluino is assumed to be the only light coloured sparticle and gluino masses below 1090 GeV are excluded.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of MTtau after all analysis requirements but the requirement on MTtau and the final requirement on HT for the...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of HT after the MTtau requirement for the 1-tau ''Loose'' SR. The SM prediction includes the data-driven corrections discussed...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of MTtau after all analysis requirements but the requirement on MTtau and the final requirement on HT for the...","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of HT after the MTtau requirement for the 1-tau ''Tight'' SR. The SM prediction includes the data-driven corrections discussed...","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of MTtau1 + MTtau2 in the 2tau channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR requirements on MTtau1...","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of HT2j in the 2tau channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR requirements on MTtau1 + MTtau2...","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the jet multiplicity in the 2tau channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR requirements on MTtau1...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+e channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+e channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+e channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+e channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+mu channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+mu channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+mu channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the final kinematic variables in the tau+mu channel after all analysis requirements but the final SR selections on...","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL lower limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) using a combination of all channels....","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL lower limits on the minimal GMSB model parameters Lambda and tan(beta) using a combination of all channels....","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL lower limits on the mSUGRA/CMSSM model parameters m0 and m1/2 for the combination of the 1tau, tau+e...","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL lower limits on the mSUGRA/CMSSM model parameters m0 and m1/2 for the combination of the 1tau, tau+e...","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL lower limits on the simplified nGM model parameters m(stau) and m(gluino) for the combination of the 2tau,...","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL lower limits on the simplified nGM model parameters m(stau) and m(gluino) for the combination of the 2tau,...","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL lower limits on the bRPV model parameters m0 and m1/2 for the combination of all channels. Additional...","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL lower limits on the bRPV model parameters m0 and m1/2 for the combination of all channels. Additional...","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cross section predictions for the nGM grid. For each signal point 25000 MC events have been generated.","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper cross section limits for the nGM grid. For each signal point 25000 MC events have been generated. The...","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the GMSB grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the GMSB grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the GMSB grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of acceptance and efficiency for the GMSB grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the GMSB grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the GMSB grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the mSUGRA grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the mSUGRA grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the bRPV grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the bRPV grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the bRPV grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the bRPV grid in the 1-tau analysis.","name":"Table 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the bRPV grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the bRPV grid in the 1tau analysis.","name":"Table 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 44"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 45"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 46"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 47"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 48"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the GMSB grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 49"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 50"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 51"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 52"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 53"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 54"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the nGM grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 55"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic uncertainty for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 56"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 57"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 58"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 59"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 60"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the bRPV grid in the 2tau analysis.","name":"Table 61"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 62"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 63"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 64"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 65"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 66"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the GMSB grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 67"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 68"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 69"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 70"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 71"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 72"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the nGM grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 73"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 74"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 75"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 76"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 77"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 78"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the bRPV grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 79"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 80"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 81"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 82"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 83"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 84"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+e analysis.","name":"Table 85"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 86"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 87"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 88"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 89"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 90"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the GMSB grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 91"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 92"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 93"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 94"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 95"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 96"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the nGM grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 97"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 98"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 99"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 100"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t101","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 101"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t102","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 102"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t103","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the bRPV grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 103"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t104","@type":"Dataset","description":"Systematic Uncertainty for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 104"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t105","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 105"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t106","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 106"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t107","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of acceptance and efficiency for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 107"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t108","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 108"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t109","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed CLs values for the mSUGRA grid in the tau+mu analysis.","name":"Table 109"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t110","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example cutflow for three benchmark signal points in the 1-tau channel. For the GMSB point 50000 events have been generated,...","name":"Table 110"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t111","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example cutflow for three benchmark signal points in the 2tau analysis. Specific SRs are indicated at the respective cut. Event...","name":"Table 111"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t112","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example cutflow for four benchmark signal points in the tau+e analysis. Event numbers are normalised to 21 fb^{-1} luminosity. For...","name":"Table 112"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.65525.v1/t113","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example cutflow for four benchmark signal points in the tau+mu analysis. Event numbers are normalised to 21 fb^{-1} luminosity. For...","name":"Table 113"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1304458?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/65525"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for supersymmetry in events with large missing transverse momentum, jets, and at least one tau lepton in 20 fb$^{-1}$ of $\\sqrt{s}$=8 TeV proton-proton collision data with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1304458?version=1","version":1}