{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1379971"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054908","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ALICE Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ALICE Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2016","description":"CERN-LHC.  The size of the particle emission region in high-energy collisions can be deduced using the femtoscopic correlations of particle pairs at low relative momentum. Such correlations arise due to quantum statistics and Coulomb and strong final state interactions. In this paper, results are presented from femtoscopic analyses of $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$, ${\\rm K}^{\\pm}{\\rm K}^{\\pm}$, ${\\rm K}^{0}_S{\\rm K}^{0}_S$, ${\\rm pp}$, and ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$ correlations from Pb-Pb collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm {NN}}}=2.76$ TeV by the ALICE experiment at the LHC. One-dimensional radii of the system are extracted from correlation functions in terms of the invariant momentum difference of the pair. The comparison of the measured radii with the predictions from a hydrokinetic model is discussed. The pion and kaon source radii display a monotonic decrease with increasing average pair transverse mass $m_{\\rm T}$ which is consistent with hydrodynamic model predictions for central collisions. The kaon and proton source sizes can be reasonably described by approximate $m_{\\rm T}$-scaling.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation function for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$ for centrality 0-10% and $\\left < k_{\\rm T} \\right > = 0.35$ GeV/$c$.","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation function for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$ for centrality 0-10% and $\\left < k_{\\rm T} \\right > = 0.48$...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation function for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$ for centrality 0-10% and $\\left < k_{\\rm T} \\right > = 1.0$ GeV/$c$.","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}} \\overline{\\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}} \\overline{\\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm \\overline{p}} \\overline{\\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm p}{\\rm {p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm {p}}\\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm p}{\\rm {p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm {p}}\\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda_{{\\rm p}{\\rm {p}}}+\\lambda_{{\\rm {p}}\\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm \\overline{p}}{\\rm \\overline{p}}$.","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm {p}}{\\rm {p}}$.","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for ${\\rm K^{\\pm}}{\\rm K^{\\pm}}$.","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $0-10\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $10-30\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.72256.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"$R_{\\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\\rm T}$ for $30-50\\%$ centrality for $\\pi^{\\pm}\\pi^{\\pm}$.","name":"Table 33"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1379971?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/72256"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"One-dimensional pion, kaon, and proton femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\rm {NN}}}$ =2.76 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1379971?version=1","version":1}