{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1422615"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.005","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2016","description":"CERN-LHC.  Results are reported of a search for new phenomena, such as supersymmetric particle production, that could be observed in high-energy proton--proton collisions. Events with large numbers of jets, together with missing transverse momentum from unobserved particles, are selected. The data analysed were recorded by the ATLAS experiment during 2015 using the 13 TeV centre-of-mass proton--proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb$^{-1}$. The search selected events with various jet multiplicities from $\\ge 7$ to $\\ge 10$ jets, and with various $b$-jet multiplicity requirements to enhance sensitivity. No excess above Standard Model expectations is observed. The results are interpreted within two supersymmetry models, where gluino masses up to 1400 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, significantly extending previous limits.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in validation region 7ej50 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in validation region 6ej80 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 10j50 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 10j50 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j80 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j80 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid.","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid when the signal cross section is increased by one standard deviation.","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid when the signal cross section is decreased by one standard deviation.","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid.","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"+1 sigma excursion of the expected 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid.","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"-1 sigma excursion of the expected 95% CL limit for the pMSSM grid.","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid.","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid when the signal cross section is increased by one standard deviation.","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid when the signal cross section is decreased by one standard deviation.","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid.","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"+1 sigma excursion of the expected 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid.","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"-1 sigma excursion of the expected 95% CL limit for the 2Step grid.","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j50 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j50 1b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j50 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 9j50 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 9j50 1b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 9j50 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 10j50 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 10j50 1b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 10j50 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 7j80 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 7j80 1b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 7j80 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j80 0b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j80 1b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"$E_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{miss}} / \\sqrt{H_{\\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution in signal region 8j80 2b. Two benchmark signal models are overlaid on the plot for comparison....","name":"Table 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Degree of multijet closure for signal and vaidation regions with at no b-jet requirement. The solid lines are the pre-fit...","name":"Table 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Degree of multijet closure for signal and vaidation regions with at least 1 b-jet. The solid lines are the pre-fit...","name":"Table 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Degree of multijet closure for signal and vaidation regions with at least 2 b-jets. The solid lines are the pre-fit...","name":"Table 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of all 15 signal regions (post-fit).","name":"Table 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal region yielding the best-expected CLs value, the best expected CLs value, and the corresponding observed CLs value for the...","name":"Table 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal region yielding the best-expected CLs value, the best expected CLs value, and the corresponding observed CLs value for the...","name":"Table 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"95% CLs observed upper limit on model cross-section for 2-step signal points for the best-expected signal region.","name":"Table 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-0b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-1b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-2b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-0b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 44"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-1b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 45"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-2b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 46"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-0b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 47"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-1b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 48"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-2b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 49"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-0b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 50"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-1b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 51"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-2b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 52"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-0b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 53"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-1b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 54"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-2b selection for the pMSSM grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 55"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-0b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 56"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-1b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 57"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j50-2b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 58"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-0b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 59"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-1b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 60"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 9j50-2b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 61"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-0b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 62"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-1b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 63"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 10j50-2b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 64"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-0b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 65"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-1b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 66"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 7j80-2b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 67"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-0b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 68"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-1b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 69"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.71987.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"Performance of the 8j80-2b selection for the 2Step grid: number of generated signal events; total signal cross-section; acceptance; efficiency (fractional);...","name":"Table 70"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1422615?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/71987"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum with ATLAS using $\\sqrt{s} =13$ TeV proton--proton collisions","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1422615?version=1","version":1}