{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1468068"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)045","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"}],"creator":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"}],"datePublished":"2018","description":"CERN-LHC.  Combined ATLAS and CMS measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates, as well as constraints on its couplings to vector bosons and fermions, are presented. The combination is based on the analysis of five production processes, namely gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production with a $W$ or a $Z$ boson or a pair of top quarks, and of the six decay modes $H \\to ZZ, WW$, $\\gamma\\gamma, \\tau\\tau, bb$, and $\\mu\\mu$. All results are reported assuming a value of 125.09 GeV for the Higgs boson mass, the result of the combined measurement by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. The analysis uses the CERN LHC proton-proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2011 and 2012, corresponding to integrated luminosities per experiment of approximately 5 fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV and 20 fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The Higgs boson production and decay rates measured by the two experiments are combined within the context of three generic parameterisations: two based on cross sections and branching fractions, and one on ratios of coupling modifiers. Several interpretations of the measurements with more model-dependent parameterisations are also given. The combined signal yield relative to the Standard Model prediction is measured to be 1.09 $\\pm$ 0.11. The combined measurements lead to observed significances for the vector boson fusion production process and for the $H \\to \\tau\\tau$ decay of 5.4 and 5.5 standard deviations, respectively. The data are consistent with the Standard Model predictions for all parameterisations considered.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma_i \\cdot \\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i \\to H\\to f$, as obtained from the generic...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma_i \\cdot \\mathrm{B}^f$ relative to their SM prediction for each specific channel $i \\to H\\to f$,...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma(gg\\to H\\to ZZ)$, $\\sigma_i/\\sigma_{gg\\mathrm{F}}$, and $\\mathrm{B}^f/\\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ from the combined analysis of the $\\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma(gg\\to H\\to ZZ)$, $\\sigma_i/\\sigma_{gg\\mathrm{F}}$, and $\\mathrm{B}^f/\\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma(gg\\to H\\to WW)$, $\\sigma_i/\\sigma_{gg\\mathrm{F}}$, and $\\mathrm{B}^f/\\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV...","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\sigma(gg\\to H\\to WW)$, $\\sigma_i/\\sigma_{gg\\mathrm{F}}$, and $\\mathrm{B}^f/\\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of...","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best fit values of $\\kappa_{gZ}= \\kappa_{g}\\cdot\\kappa_{Z} / \\kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured global signal strength $\\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured signal strengths $\\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the...","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured signal strengths $\\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the...","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\\mu_F^f = \\mu_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\\mu_V^f = \\mu_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels....","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\\mu_V/\\mu_F = \\mu_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\\mu_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\\mu_F^f$ for each of the five...","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\\kappa_{V}| \\le$ 1, where $\\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\\kappa_{Z}$ or $\\kappa_{W}$, and that $\\mathrm{B_{BSM}}...","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e....","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured...","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results...","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for...","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\\sigma_i\\cdot\\mathrm{B}^f$...","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\\sigma(gg\\to...","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\\kappa_{gZ}=\\kappa_{g}\\cdot\\kappa_{Z}...","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with...","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{g}$,$\\kappa_{\\gamma}$) plane.","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{g}$,$\\kappa_{\\gamma}$) plane.","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{g}$,$\\kappa_{\\gamma}$) plane.","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane.","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\gamma\\gamma$ channel.","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow WW$ channel.","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau$ channel.","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow bb$ channel.","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane.","name":"Table 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane.","name":"Table 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\gamma\\gamma$ channel, assuming $\\kappa_{F}>0$.","name":"Table 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\\kappa_{F}>0$.","name":"Table 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\\kappa_{F}>0$.","name":"Table 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau$ channel, assuming $\\kappa_{F}>0$.","name":"Table 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\\kappa_{F}$,$\\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\\kappa_{F}>0$.","name":"Table 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\mu^{f}_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\\mu^{f}_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\gamma\\gamma$ channel.","name":"Table 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\mu^{f}_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\\mu^{f}_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.","name":"Table 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\mu^{f}_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\\mu^{f}_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow WW$ channel.","name":"Table 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\mu^{f}_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\\mu^{f}_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau$ channel.","name":"Table 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78403.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\\mu^{f}_{gg\\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\\mu^{f}_{\\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\\rightarrow bb$ channel.","name":"Table 44"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1468068?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/78403"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC $pp$ collision data at $\\sqrt{s}=$ 7 and 8 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1468068?version=1","version":1}