{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1615470"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5445-x","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2017","description":"The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks in events with two leptons (electrons or muons) are reported, using 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from proton--proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. To cover a range of mass differences between the top squark $\\tilde{t}$ and lighter supersymmetric particles, four possible decay modes of the top squark are targeted with dedicated selections: the decay $\\tilde{t} \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{\\pm}$ into a $b$-quark and the lightest chargino, the decay $\\tilde{t} \\rightarrow t \\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ into an on-shell top quark and the lightest neutralino, the three-body decay $\\tilde{t} \\rightarrow b W \\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and the four-body decay $\\tilde{t} \\rightarrow b \\ell \\nu \\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background for any selection, and limits on top squarks are set as a function of the $\\tilde{t}$ and $\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$  masses. The results exclude at 95% confidence level $\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ masses up to about 720 GeV, extending the exclusion region of supersymmetric parameter space covered by previous searches.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ background fits. The nominal expectations from MC...","name":"Background fit 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...","name":"Background fit 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $n_{jets}$ in CR$^{2-body}_{top}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $R_{2\\ell 2j}$ in $CR^{2-body}_{VV-SF}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...","name":"CR kinematics 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T,corr}^{miss}$ in $CR_{ttZ}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T,corr}^{miss}$ in $CR_{VZ}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC...","name":"Background fit 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{t\\bar{t}}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $cos\\theta_{b}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{VV-DF}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\\Delta}^{R}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{VV-SF}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...","name":"CR kinematics 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SR$^{4-body}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...","name":"Background fit 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of the $p_{T}(j_1)$ in CR$^{4-body}_{t\\bar{t}}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...","name":"CR kinematics 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of the $R_{2\\ell}$ in CR$^{4-body}_{VV}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...","name":"CR kinematics 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of the $E^{miss}_{T}$ in CR$^{4-body}_{Z\\tau\\tau}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...","name":"CR kinematics 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for...","name":"Background fit 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for those backgrounds...","name":"Background fit 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for SR(A,B)$^{2-body}_{x,y}$ regions, where x and y denote the low and high edges of the...","name":"Background fit 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection background fit results for SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Uncertainties on the predicted...","name":"Background fit 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in same-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ selection criteria except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in different-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ selection criteria except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\\Delta}^{R}$ in same-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ selection criteria except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\\Delta}^{R}$ in different-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ selection criteria except for the one on...","name":"SR kinematics 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\\ell 4j}$ for events satisfying all the SR$^{4-body}$ selections but for the one on the variable...","name":"SR kinematics 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\\ell}$ for events satisfying all the SR$^{4-body}$ selections but for the one on the variable shown...","name":"SR kinematics 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection background fit results for SR$^{4-body}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for those backgrounds...","name":"Background fit 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model-independent 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section ($\\sigma_{vis}$) of new physics, the visible number of signal events ($S^{95}_{\\rm...","name":"Model-independent limits"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for a simplified model assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100%...","name":"Exclusion contour (obs) 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL for a simplified model assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100%...","name":"Exclusion contour (exp) 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the analysis of $36.1 \\; \\text{fb}^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data as...","name":"Exclusion contour (exp) 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the analysis of $36.1 \\; \\text{fb}^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data as...","name":"Exclusion contour (obs) 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...","name":"Exclusion contour (exp) 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...","name":"Exclusion contour (obs) 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...","name":"Exclusion contour (exp) 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...","name":"Exclusion contour (obs) 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Illustration of the best expected signal region per signal grid point for the simplified model assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying...","name":"Best-expected SR"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for the VR in the SRA$^{2-body}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC...","name":"Background fit 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection background fit results for the VR in the SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...","name":"Background fit 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection background fit results for the VRs in the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ background-only fits. The nominal expectations from MC...","name":"Background fit 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection background fit results for the VRs in the SR$^{4-body}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...","name":"Background fit 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T}^{miss}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{VV-DF}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...","name":"VR kinematics 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{t\\bar{t}}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...","name":"VR kinematics 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-body selection distribution of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{t\\bar{t},3j}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...","name":"VR kinematics 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\\Delta}^{R}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{t\\bar{t}}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...","name":"VR kinematics 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{VV-SF}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...","name":"VR kinematics 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{VV-DF}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...","name":"VR kinematics 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\\ell 4j}$ for events with at least 2 jets (with the two leading required not be...","name":"FNP validation 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\\ell}$ for events with at least 2 jets (with the two leading required not be identified...","name":"FNP validation 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"Four-body selection distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{4-body}_{t\\bar{t}}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...","name":"VR kinematics 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ model.","name":"Cutflow 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ model.","name":"Cutflow 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b W \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_1$ model.","name":"Cutflow 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b f f \\prime \\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$...","name":"Cutflow 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1...","name":"Cross section Upper Limits 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1...","name":"Cross section Upper Limits 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming the pMSSM model described in the...","name":"Cross section Upper Limits 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming the pMSSM model described in the...","name":"Cross section Upper Limits 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Acceptance SRA 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Acceptance SRB 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SRB 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Acceptance SRB 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SRB 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Acceptance SRC 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SRC 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SR 3-body 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SR 3-body 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SR 3-body 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Acceptance SR 3-body 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{4-body}$ acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b f f \\prime \\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with...","name":"Acceptance SR 4-body"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_1$ with 100%...","name":"Efficiency SRA 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRB 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRB 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRB 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRB 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRC 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow t\\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...","name":"Efficiency SRC 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Efficiency SR 3-body 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Efficiency SR 3-body 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Efficiency SR 3-body 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_{1}\\rightarrow t+\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.","name":"Efficiency SR 3-body 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"SR$^{4-body}$ efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\\tilde{t}_1 \\rightarrow b f f \\prime \\tilde{\\chi}^0_1$ with...","name":"Efficiency SR 4-body"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1615470?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/78219"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in $\\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1615470?version=1","version":1}