• Browse all
Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration
No Journal Information, 2017

Abstract (data abstract)
The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks in events with two leptons (electrons or muons) are reported, using 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. To cover a range of mass differences between the top squark $\tilde{t}$ and lighter supersymmetric particles, four possible decay modes of the top squark are targeted with dedicated selections: the decay $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}$ into a $b$-quark and the lightest chargino, the decay $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ into an on-shell top quark and the lightest neutralino, the three-body decay $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and the four-body decay $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \ell \nu \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background for any selection, and limits on top squarks are set as a function of the $\tilde{t}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ masses. The results exclude at 95% confidence level $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ masses up to about 720 GeV, extending the exclusion region of supersymmetric parameter space covered by previous searches.

  • Background fit 1

    Data from Table 7

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t1

    Two-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ background fits. The nominal expectations from MC...

  • Background fit 2

    Data from Table 8

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t2

    Two-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...

  • CR kinematics 1

    Data from Figure 2a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t3

    Two-body selection distribution of $n_{jets}$ in CR$^{2-body}_{top}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • CR kinematics 2

    Data from Figure 2b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t4

    Two-body selection distribution of $R_{2\ell 2j}$ in $CR^{2-body}_{VV-SF}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...

  • CR kinematics 3

    Data from Figure 2c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t5

    Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T,corr}^{miss}$ in $CR_{ttZ}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • CR kinematics 4

    Data from Figure 2d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t6

    Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T,corr}^{miss}$ in $CR_{VZ}$ after the background fits. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • Background fit 3

    Data from Table 10

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t7

    Three-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC...

  • CR kinematics 5

    Data from Figure 3a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t8

    Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{t\bar{t}}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • CR kinematics 6

    Data from Figure 3b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t9

    Three-body selection distributions of $cos\theta_{b}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{VV-DF}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • CR kinematics 7

    Data from Figure 3c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t10

    Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\Delta}^{R}$ in $CR^{3-body}_{VV-SF}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as...

  • Background fit 4

    Data from Table 12

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t11

    Four-body selection background fit results for the CRs of the SR$^{4-body}$ background fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...

  • CR kinematics 8

    Data from Figure 4a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t12

    Four-body selection distributions of the $p_{T}(j_1)$ in CR$^{4-body}_{t\bar{t}}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...

  • CR kinematics 9

    Data from Figure 4b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t13

    Four-body selection distributions of the $R_{2\ell}$ in CR$^{4-body}_{VV}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...

  • CR kinematics 10

    Data from Figure 4c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t14

    Four-body selection distributions of the $E^{miss}_{T}$ in CR$^{4-body}_{Z\tau\tau}$ after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown...

  • Background fit 5

    Data from Table 15

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t15

    Two-body selection background fit results for SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for...

  • Background fit 6

    Data from Table 15

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t16

    Two-body selection background fit results for SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for those backgrounds...

  • SR kinematics 1

    Data from Figure 6a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t17

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 2

    Data from Figure 6b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t18

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 3

    Data from Figure 6c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t19

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 4

    Data from Figure 6d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t20

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 5

    Data from Figure 6e

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t21

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 6

    Data from Figure 6f

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t22

    Two-body selection distributions of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying the selection criteria of the six SRs, except for the one on...

  • Background fit 7

    Data from Table 16

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t23

    Two-body selection background fit results for SR(A,B)$^{2-body}_{x,y}$ regions, where x and y denote the low and high edges of the...

  • Background fit 8

    Data from Table 17

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t24

    Three-body selection background fit results for SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are given. Uncertainties on the predicted...

  • SR kinematics 7

    Data from Figure 7a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t25

    Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in same-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ selection criteria except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 8

    Data from Figure 7b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t26

    Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in different-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ selection criteria except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 9

    Data from Figure 7c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t27

    Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\Delta}^{R}$ in same-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ selection criteria except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 10

    Data from Figure 7d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t28

    Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\Delta}^{R}$ in different-flavour events that satisfy all the SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ selection criteria except for the one on...

  • SR kinematics 11

    Data from Figure 8a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t29

    Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ for events satisfying all the SR$^{4-body}$ selections but for the one on the variable...

  • SR kinematics 12

    Data from Figure 8b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t30

    Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\ell}$ for events satisfying all the SR$^{4-body}$ selections but for the one on the variable shown...

  • Background fit 9

    Data from Table 18

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t31

    Four-body selection background fit results for SR$^{4-body}$. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are given for comparison for those backgrounds...

  • Model-independent limits

    Data from Table 19

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t32

    Model-independent 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section ($\sigma_{vis}$) of new physics, the visible number of signal events ($S^{95}_{\rm...

  • Exclusion contour (obs) 1

    Data from Figure 9

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t33

    Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100%...

  • Exclusion contour (exp) 1

    Data from Figure 9

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t34

    Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL for a simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100%...

  • Exclusion contour (exp) 2

    Data from Figure 10

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t35

    Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL from the analysis of $36.1 \; \text{fb}^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data as...

  • Exclusion contour (obs) 2

    Data from Figure 10

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t36

    Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL from the analysis of $36.1 \; \text{fb}^{-1}$ of 13 TeV $pp$ collision data as...

  • Exclusion contour (exp) 3

    Data from Figure 11 expected limits for mu<0

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t37

    Expected exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...

  • Exclusion contour (obs) 3

    Data from Figure 11 observed limits for mu<0

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t38

    Observed exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...

  • Exclusion contour (exp) 4

    Data from Figure 11 expected limits for mu>0

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t39

    Expected exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...

  • Exclusion contour (obs) 4

    Data from Figure 11 observed limits for mu>0

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t40

    Observed exclusion contour as a function of $m_{\tilde{t}_1}$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ in the pMSSM model described in the text. Pair production...

  • Best-expected SR

    Data from auxiliary Figure 1

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t41

    Illustration of the best expected signal region per signal grid point for the simplified model assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying...

  • Background fit 10

    Data from auxiliary Table 1

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t42

    Two-body selection background fit results for the VR in the SRA$^{2-body}$ and SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC...

  • Background fit 11

    Data from auxiliary Table 2

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t43

    Two-body selection background fit results for the VR in the SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...

  • Background fit 12

    Data from auxiliary Table 3

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t44

    Three-body selection background fit results for the VRs in the SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ and SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ background-only fits. The nominal expectations from MC...

  • Background fit 13

    Data from auxiliary Table 4

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t45

    Four-body selection background fit results for the VRs in the SR$^{4-body}$ background-only fit. The nominal expectations from MC simulation are...

  • VR kinematics 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 2

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t46

    Two-body selection distribution of $E_{T}^{miss}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{VV-DF}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...

  • VR kinematics 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 3a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t47

    Two-body selection distribution of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{t\bar{t}}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...

  • VR kinematics 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 3b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t48

    Two-body selection distribution of $m_{T2}^{ll}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{2-body}_{t\bar{t},3j}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...

  • VR kinematics 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 4

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t49

    Three-body selection distributions of $M_{\Delta}^{R}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{t\bar{t}}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...

  • VR kinematics 5

    Data from auxiliary Figure 5a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t50

    Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{VV-SF}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...

  • VR kinematics 6

    Data from auxiliary Figure 5b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t51

    Three-body selection distributions of $R_{p_{T}}$ in events that satisfy all the $VR^{3-body}_{VV-DF}$ selection criteria after the background fit. The contributions...

  • FNP validation 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 6a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t52

    Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\ell 4j}$ for events with at least 2 jets (with the two leading required not be...

  • FNP validation 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 6b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t53

    Four-body selection distributions of $R_{2\ell}$ for events with at least 2 jets (with the two leading required not be identified...

  • VR kinematics 7

    Data from auxiliary Figure 7

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t54

    Four-body selection distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}$ for events satisfying all the VR$^{4-body}_{t\bar{t}}$ selections, after the background fit. The contributions from all...

  • Cutflow 1

    Data from auxiliary Table 5

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t55

    Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ model.

  • Cutflow 2

    Data from auxiliary Table 6

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t56

    Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ model.

  • Cutflow 3

    Data from auxiliary Table 7

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t57

    Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b W \tilde{\chi}^{0}_1$ model.

  • Cutflow 4

    Data from auxiliary Table 8

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t58

    Number of signal events selected at different stages for some scenarios in the $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b f f \prime \tilde{\chi}^0_1$...

  • Cross section Upper Limits 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 8

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t59

    Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1...

  • Cross section Upper Limits 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 9

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t60

    Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1...

  • Cross section Upper Limits 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 10a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t61

    Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming the pMSSM model described in the...

  • Cross section Upper Limits 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 10b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t62

    Upper limits on cross-sections (in fb) at 95% CL for each signal model, assuming the pMSSM model described in the...

  • Acceptance SRA 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t63

    SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t64

    SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t65

    SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t66

    SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 5

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11e

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t67

    SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 6

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11f

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t68

    SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 7

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11g

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t69

    SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRA 8

    Data from auxiliary Figure 11h

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t70

    SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Same Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Acceptance SRB 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 12a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t71

    SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Acceptance SRB 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 12b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t72

    SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SRB 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 12c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t73

    SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Acceptance SRB 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 12d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t74

    SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SRC 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 13a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t75

    SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Acceptance SRC 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 13b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t76

    SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SR 3-body 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 14a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t77

    SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SR 3-body 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 14b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t78

    SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SR 3-body 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 14c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t79

    SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Different Flavour acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SR 3-body 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 14d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t80

    SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ SF acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Acceptance SR 4-body

    Data from auxiliary Figure 15

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t81

    SR$^{4-body}$ acceptance for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b f f \prime \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with...

  • Efficiency SRA 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t82

    SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t83

    SRA$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t84

    SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t85

    SRA$^{2-body}_{140,160}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 5

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16e

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t86

    SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 6

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16f

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t87

    SRA$^{2-body}_{160,180}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 7

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16i

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t88

    SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRA 8

    Data from auxiliary Figure 16h

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t89

    SRA$^{2-body}_{180}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ with 100%...

  • Efficiency SRB 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 17a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t90

    SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SRB 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 17b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t91

    SRB$^{2-body}_{120,140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SRB 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 17c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t92

    SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SRB 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 17d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t93

    SRB$^{2-body}_{140}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SRC 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 18a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t94

    SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SRC 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 18b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t95

    SRC$^{2-body}_{110}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with 100% branching...

  • Efficiency SR 3-body 1

    Data from auxiliary Figure 19a

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t96

    SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Efficiency SR 3-body 2

    Data from auxiliary Figure 19b

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t97

    SR$^{3-body}_{W}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Efficiency SR 3-body 3

    Data from auxiliary Figure 19c

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t98

    SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Different Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Efficiency SR 3-body 4

    Data from auxiliary Figure 19d

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t99

    SR$^{3-body}_{t}$ Same Flavour efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_{1}$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_{1}\rightarrow t+\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ with 100% branching ratio.

  • Efficiency SR 4-body

    Data from auxiliary Figure 20

    10.17182/hepdata.78219.v1/t100

    SR$^{4-body}$ efficiency for each signal model, assuming $\tilde{t}_1$ pair production, decaying via $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow b f f \prime \tilde{\chi}^0_1$ with...

Loading Data...