Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration
No Journal Information, 2017

Abstract (data abstract)
CERN-LHC. The results of a search for the direct pair production of stops, the supersymmetric partner of the top-quark, in final states with one isolated electron or muon, several energetic jets, and missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses data from pp collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1/fb. A wide range of signal scenarios with different mass splittings between the stop, the lightest neutralino and possible intermediate gauginos or higgsinos is considered, including cases where the W-bosons or the top-quarks are off-shell. The analysis also targets the production of dark matter in association with a pair of top-quarks using the same final state. No significant excess over the Standard Model prediction is observed. The null results are used to set exclusion limits at 95% confidence level in several benchmark models, which reach up to a stop mass of 940 GeV. Stringent exclusion limits are also derived for all other considered stop decay scenarios, and upper limits are set on the visible cross-section for processes beyond the Standard Model.

  • Table 1

    Data from Figure 17a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t1

    $\textbf{Distribution 1 } -$ Kinematic distribution of $m_{\rm top}^{\rm reclustered}$ in tN_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal...

  • Table 2

    Data from Figure 17b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t2

    $\textbf{Distribution 2 } -$ Kinematic distribution of amT2 in bC2x_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 3

    Data from Figure 17c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t3

    $\textbf{Distribution 3 } -$ Kinematic distribution of mT in bC2x_diag. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 4

    Data from Figure 17d.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t4

    $\textbf{Distribution 4 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in bCbv. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 5

    Data from Figure 17e.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t5

    $\textbf{Distribution 5 } -$ Kinematic distribution of mT in DM_low. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 6

    Data from Figure 17f.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t6

    $\textbf{Distribution 6 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in DM_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 7

    Data from Figure 18a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t7

    $\textbf{Distribution 7 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_low region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...

  • Table 8

    Data from Figure 18b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t8

    $\textbf{Distribution 8 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_med region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...

  • Table 9

    Data from Figure 18c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t9

    $\textbf{Distribution 9 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_high region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...

  • Table 10

    Data from Figure 19a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t10

    $\textbf{Distribution 10 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in tN_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 11

    Data from Figure 19b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t11

    $\textbf{Distribution 11 } -$ Kinematic distribution of amT2 in bWN. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 12

    Data from Figure 19c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t12

    $\textbf{Distribution 12 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bffN. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 13

    Data from Figure 19d.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t13

    $\textbf{Distribution 13 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_diag. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 14

    Data from Figure 19e.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t14

    $\textbf{Distribution 14 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 15

    Data from Figure 19f.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t15

    $\textbf{Distribution 15 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...

  • Table 16

    Data from Figure 20.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t16

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 1 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 17

    Data from Figure 20.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t17

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 1 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 18

    Data from Figure Aux 2a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t18

    $\textbf{Selected SR 1 } -$ Selected signal regions for the bino LSP model in the m(STOP) vs m(NEUTRALINO) plane.

  • Table 19

    Data from Figure 21.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t19

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 2 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 20

    Data from Figure 21.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t20

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 2 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 21

    Data from Figure Aux 2b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t21

    $\textbf{Selected SR 2 } -$ Selected signal regions for the bino LSP model in the m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) plane.

  • Table 22

    Data from Figure 22.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t22

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 3 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 23

    Data from Figure 22.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t23

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 3 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 24

    Data from Figure Aux 4a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t24

    $\textbf{Selected SR 3 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct stop/sbottom pair...

  • Table 25

    Data from Figure 22.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t25

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 4 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 26

    Data from Figure 22.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t26

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 4 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...

  • Table 27

    Data from Figure Aux 4b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t27

    $\textbf{Selected SR 4 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct stop/sbottom pair...

  • Table 28

    Data from Figure 23.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t28

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 5 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 29

    Data from Figure 23.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t29

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 5 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 30

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t30

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 6 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 31

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t31

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 6 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 32

    Data from Figure Aux 6a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t32

    $\textbf{Selected SR 6 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 33

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t33

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 7 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 34

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t34

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 7 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 35

    Data from Figure Aux 6b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t35

    $\textbf{Selected SR 7 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 36

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t36

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 8 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 37

    Data from Figure 25.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t37

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 8 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 38

    Data from Figure Aux 6c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t38

    $\textbf{Selected SR 8 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 39

    Data from Figure 26.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t39

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 9 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 40

    Data from Figure 26.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t40

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 9 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 41

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t41

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 10 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 42

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t42

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 10 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 43

    Data from Figure Aux 8a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t43

    $\textbf{Selected SR 10 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 44

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t44

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 11 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 45

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t45

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 11 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 46

    Data from Figure Aux 8b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t46

    $\textbf{Selected SR 11 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 47

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t47

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 12 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 48

    Data from Figure 24.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t48

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 12 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 49

    Data from Figure Aux 8c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t49

    $\textbf{Selected SR 12 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...

  • Table 50

    Data from Figure 27.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t50

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 13 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...

  • Table 51

    Data from Figure 27.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t51

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 13 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...

  • Table 52

    Data from Figure Aux 11a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t52

    $\textbf{Selected SR 13 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct stop/sbottom pair...

  • Table 53

    Data from Figure 27.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t53

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 14 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...

  • Table 54

    Data from Figure 27.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t54

    $\textbf{Exclusion contour 14 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...

  • Table 55

    Data from Figure Aux 11b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t55

    $\textbf{Selected SR 14 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct stop/sbottom pair...

  • Table 56

    Data from Figure 28a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t56

    $\textbf{DM Upper Limit 1 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...

  • Table 57

    Data from Figure 28b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t57

    $\textbf{DM Upper Limit 2 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...

  • Table 58

    Data from Figure 28c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t58

    $\textbf{DM Upper Limit 3 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...

  • Table 59

    Data from Figure 28d.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t59

    $\textbf{DM Upper Limit 4 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...

  • Table 60

    Data from Figure Aux 1a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t60

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 1 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the bino LSP model in the...

  • Table 61

    Data from Figure Aux 1b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t61

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 2 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the bino LSP model in the...

  • Table 62

    Data from Figure Aux 3a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t62

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 3 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the wino NLSP model with mu...

  • Table 63

    Data from Figure Aux 3b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t63

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 4 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the wino NLSP model with mu...

  • Table 64

    Data from Figure Aux 5a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t64

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 5 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with left-handed...

  • Table 65

    Data from Figure Aux 5b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t65

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 6 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with right-handed...

  • Table 66

    Data from Figure Aux 5c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t66

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 7 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with large...

  • Table 67

    Data from Figure Aux 7a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t67

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 8 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...

  • Table 68

    Data from Figure Aux 7b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t68

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 9 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...

  • Table 69

    Data from Figure Aux 7c.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t69

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 10 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...

  • Table 70

    Data from Figure Aux 9a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t70

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 11 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the simplified model with m(STOP) -...

  • Table 71

    Data from Figure Aux 9b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t71

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 12 } -$ Observed 95% upper cross-section limit in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...

  • Table 72

    Data from Figure Aux 10a.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t72

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 13 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the well-tempered neutralino model with left-handed...

  • Table 73

    Data from Figure Aux 10b.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t73

    $\textbf{X-section U.L. 14 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the well-tempered neutralino model with right-handed...

  • Table 74

    Data from Table Aux 1.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t74

    $\textbf{Cutflow 1 } -$ Cutflow for tN_med for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...

  • Table 75

    Data from Table Aux 2.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t75

    $\textbf{Cutflow 2 } -$ Cutflow for tN_high for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...

  • Table 76

    Data from Table Aux 3.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t76

    $\textbf{Cutflow 3 } -$ Cutflow for bWN for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...

  • Table 77

    Data from Table Aux 4.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t77

    $\textbf{Cutflow 4 } -$ Cutflow for bffN for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...

  • Table 78

    Data from Table Aux 5.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t78

    $\textbf{Cutflow 5 } -$ Cutflow for bC2x_diag for the wino NLSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...

  • Table 79

    Data from Table Aux 6.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t79

    $\textbf{Cutflow 6 } -$ Cutflow for bC2x_med for the wino NLSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...

  • Table 80

    Data from Table Aux 7.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t80

    $\textbf{Cutflow 7 } -$ Cutflow for the simplified signal model with $\Delta m( \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ = 10 GeV,...

  • Table 81

    Data from Table Aux 8.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t81

    $\textbf{Cutflow 8 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_diag for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...

  • Table 82

    Data from Table Aux 9.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t82

    $\textbf{Cutflow 9 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_med for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...

  • Table 83

    Data from Table Aux 10.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t83

    $\textbf{Cutflow 10 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_high for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\tilde{t}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} , \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...

  • Table 84

    Data from Table Aux 11.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t84

    $\textbf{Cutflow 11 } -$ Cutflow for DM_high for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\phi, \chi)$ = (300, 1) GeV, assuming...

  • Table 85

    Data from Table Aux 12.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t85

    $\textbf{Cutflow 12 } -$ Cutflow for DM_low for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\phi, \chi)$ = (20, 1) GeV, assuming...

  • Table 86

    Data from Table Aux 13.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t86

    $\textbf{Cutflow 13 } -$ Cutflow for DM_low_loose for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\phi, \chi)$ = (20, 1) GeV, assuming...

  • Table 87

    Data from Figure Aux 14.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t87

    $\textbf{Acceptance 1 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane. Efficiencies larger...

  • Table 88

    Data from Figure Aux 14.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t88

    $\textbf{Efficiency 1 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane. Efficiencies larger...

  • Table 89

    Data from Figure Aux 15.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t89

    $\textbf{Acceptance 2 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{t}_{1},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ plane. Efficiencies...

  • Table 90

    Data from Figure Aux 15.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t90

    $\textbf{Efficiency 2 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{t}_{1},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ plane. Efficiencies...

  • Table 91

    Data from Figure Aux 16.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t91

    $\textbf{Acceptance 3 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the wino NLSP model with $\mu > 0$.

  • Table 92

    Data from Figure Aux 16.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t92

    $\textbf{Efficiency 3 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the wino NLSP model with $\mu > 0$.

  • Table 93

    Data from Figure Aux 17.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t93

    $\textbf{Acceptance 4 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV....

  • Table 94

    Data from Figure Aux 17.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t94

    $\textbf{Efficiency 4 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV....

  • Table 95

    Data from Figure Aux 18.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t95

    $\textbf{Acceptance 5 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV,...

  • Table 96

    Data from Figure Aux 18.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t96

    $\textbf{Efficiency 5 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV,...

  • Table 97

    Data from Figure Aux 19.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t97

    $\textbf{Acceptance 6 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the simplified model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}) = 10$ GeV.

  • Table 98

    Data from Figure Aux 19.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t98

    $\textbf{Efficiency 6 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the simplified model with $\Delta m (\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}, \tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}) = 10$ GeV.

  • Table 99

    Data from Figure Aux 20.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t99

    $\textbf{Acceptance 7 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the spin-0 mediator model, assuming a scalar mediator. Acceptance and efficiency numbers...

  • Table 100

    Data from Figure Aux 20.

    10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t100

    $\textbf{Efficiency 7 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the spin-0 mediator model, assuming a scalar mediator. Acceptance and efficiency numbers...

Version 4 modifications: Updating DM upper limit tables (previous numbers were outdated).

Loading Data...