{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1639856"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2018)108","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2017","description":"CERN-LHC.  The results of a search for the direct pair production of stops, the supersymmetric partner of the top-quark, in final states with one isolated electron or muon, several energetic jets, and missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses data from pp collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1/fb. A wide range of signal scenarios with different mass splittings between the stop, the lightest neutralino and possible intermediate gauginos or higgsinos is considered, including cases where the W-bosons or the top-quarks are off-shell. The analysis also targets the production of dark matter in association with a pair of top-quarks using the same final state. No significant excess over the Standard Model prediction is observed. The null results are used to set exclusion limits at 95% confidence level in several benchmark models, which reach up to a stop mass of 940 GeV. Stringent exclusion limits are also derived for all other considered stop decay scenarios, and upper limits are set on the visible cross-section for processes beyond the Standard Model.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 1 } -$ Kinematic distribution of $m_{\\rm top}^{\\rm reclustered}$ in tN_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 2 } -$ Kinematic distribution of amT2 in bC2x_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 3 } -$ Kinematic distribution of mT in bC2x_diag. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 4 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in bCbv. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 5 } -$ Kinematic distribution of mT in DM_low. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 6 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in DM_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 7 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_low region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 8 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_med region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 9 } -$ Distributions of BDT score for the tN_diag_high region. The SM background predictions are obtained using the...","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 10 } -$ Kinematic distribution of ETmiss in tN_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 11 } -$ Kinematic distribution of amT2 in bWN. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 12 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bffN. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 13 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_diag. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 14 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_med. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Distribution 15 } -$ Kinematic distribution of pT(l)/ETmiss in bCsoft_high. The full event selection in the corresponding signal region is...","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 1 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 1 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 1 } -$ Selected signal regions for the bino LSP model in the m(STOP) vs m(NEUTRALINO) plane.","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 2 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 2 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 2 } -$ Selected signal regions for the bino LSP model in the m(STOP) versus m(STOP)-m(NEUTRALINO) plane.","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 3 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 3 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 3 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct stop/sbottom pair...","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 4 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 4 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct...","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 4 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for the direct stop/sbottom pair...","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 5 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 5 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 6 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 6 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 6 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 7 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 7 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 7 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 8 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 8 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 8 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 9 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 9 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 10 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 10 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 10 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 11 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 44"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 11 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 45"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 11 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 46"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 12 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 47"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 12 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 48"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 12 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop pair production...","name":"Table 49"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 13 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...","name":"Table 50"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 13 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...","name":"Table 51"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 13 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct stop/sbottom pair...","name":"Table 52"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 14 (exp.) } -$ Expected 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...","name":"Table 53"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Exclusion contour 14 (obs.) } -$ Observed 95% excluded regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct...","name":"Table 54"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Selected SR 14 } -$ Selected signal regions in the plane of mm(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) or the direct stop/sbottom pair...","name":"Table 55"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{DM Upper Limit 1 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...","name":"Table 56"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{DM Upper Limit 2 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...","name":"Table 57"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{DM Upper Limit 3 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...","name":"Table 58"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{DM Upper Limit 4 } -$ Upper limit on the ratio of the DM production cross-section to the simplified model...","name":"Table 59"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 1 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the bino LSP model in the...","name":"Table 60"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 2 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the bino LSP model in the...","name":"Table 61"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 3 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the wino NLSP model with mu...","name":"Table 62"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 4 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the wino NLSP model with mu...","name":"Table 63"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 5 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with left-handed...","name":"Table 64"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 6 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with right-handed...","name":"Table 65"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 7 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the higgsino LSP model with large...","name":"Table 66"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 8 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...","name":"Table 67"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 9 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...","name":"Table 68"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 10 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the variable m(CHARGINO) - m(NEUTRALINO) higgsino...","name":"Table 69"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 11 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the simplified model with m(STOP) -...","name":"Table 70"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 12 } -$ Observed 95% upper cross-section limit in the plane of m(STOP) versus m(NEUTRALINO) for direct stop...","name":"Table 71"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 13 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the well-tempered neutralino model with left-handed...","name":"Table 72"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{X-section U.L. 14 } -$ Observed upper limit on the signal cross section for the well-tempered neutralino model with right-handed...","name":"Table 73"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 1 } -$ Cutflow for tN_med for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...","name":"Table 74"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 2 } -$ Cutflow for tN_high for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...","name":"Table 75"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 3 } -$ Cutflow for bWN for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...","name":"Table 76"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 4 } -$ Cutflow for bffN for the pure bino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ =...","name":"Table 77"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 5 } -$ Cutflow for bC2x_diag for the wino NLSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...","name":"Table 78"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 6 } -$ Cutflow for bC2x_med for the wino NLSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...","name":"Table 79"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 7 } -$ Cutflow for the simplified signal model with $\\Delta m( \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$ = 10 GeV,...","name":"Table 80"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 8 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_diag for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...","name":"Table 81"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 9 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_med for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...","name":"Table 82"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 10 } -$ Cutflow for bCsoft_high for the higgsino LSP signal model with $m(\\tilde{t}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1} , \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1} )$...","name":"Table 83"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 11 } -$ Cutflow for DM_high for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\\phi, \\chi)$ = (300, 1) GeV, assuming...","name":"Table 84"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 12 } -$ Cutflow for DM_low for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\\phi, \\chi)$ = (20, 1) GeV, assuming...","name":"Table 85"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Cutflow 13 } -$ Cutflow for DM_low_loose for the spin-0 mediator model with $m(\\phi, \\chi)$ = (20, 1) GeV, assuming...","name":"Table 86"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 1 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane. Efficiencies larger...","name":"Table 87"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 1 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $m_{\\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane. Efficiencies larger...","name":"Table 88"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 2 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $\\Delta m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1})$ plane. Efficiencies...","name":"Table 89"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 2 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the bino LSP model in the $m_{\\tilde{t}_{1}}$ vs $\\Delta m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1})$ plane. Efficiencies...","name":"Table 90"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 3 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the wino NLSP model with $\\mu > 0$.","name":"Table 91"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 3 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the wino NLSP model with $\\mu > 0$.","name":"Table 92"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 4 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV....","name":"Table 93"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 4 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV....","name":"Table 94"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 5 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV,...","name":"Table 95"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 5 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the higgsino LSP model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{0}_{1}) = 5$ GeV,...","name":"Table 96"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 6 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the simplified model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}) = 10$ GeV.","name":"Table 97"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 6 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the simplified model with $\\Delta m (\\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}, \\tilde{\\chi}^{\\pm}_{1}) = 10$ GeV.","name":"Table 98"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Acceptance 7 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the spin-0 mediator model, assuming a scalar mediator. Acceptance and efficiency numbers...","name":"Table 99"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.79304.v4/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\textbf{Efficiency 7 } -$ Acceptance and efficiency for the spin-0 mediator model, assuming a scalar mediator. Acceptance and efficiency numbers...","name":"Table 100"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1639856?version=4"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/79304"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb$^{-1}$ of $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1639856?version=4","version":4}