{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1790250"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2020","description":"Higgs boson properties are studied in the four-lepton decay channel (where lepton = $e$, $\\mu$) using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collision data recorded at $\\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.  The inclusive cross-section times branching ratio for $H\\to ZZ^*$ decay is measured to be $1.34 \\pm 0.12$ pb for a Higgs boson with absolute rapidity below 2.5, in good agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $1.33 \\pm 0.08$ pb. Cross-sections times branching ratio are measured for the main Higgs boson production modes in several exclusive phase-space regions. The measurements are interpreted in terms of coupling modifiers and of the tensor structure of Higgs boson interactions using an effective field theory approach. Exclusion limits are set on the CP-even and CP-odd 'beyond the Standard Model' couplings of the Higgs boson to vector bosons, gluons and top quarks.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected number of SM Higgs boson events with a mass $m_{H}$= 125 GeV for an integrated luminosity of 139...","name":"Table 04 - Yields Higgs Production Mode "},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The impact of the dominant systematic uncertainties (in percent) on the cross-sections in production bins of the Production Mode Stage...","name":"Table 06 - Uncertainties"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton invariant mass distribution for the selected Higgs boson candidates, shown for an...","name":"Figure 05 - Distribution $m_{4l}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected (pre-fit) and observed numbers of events for an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV in the...","name":"Table 07 - Yields Results "},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the jet multiplicity distribution after the inclusive event selection for an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 06a - Distribution $N_{jets}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with zero jets, after the inclusive event...","name":"Figure 06b - Distribution $p_{T}^{4l}$ with $N_{jets}$=0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with one jet, after the inclusive event...","name":"Figure 06c - Distribution $p_{T}^{4l}$ with $N_{jets}$=1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the four-lepton transverse momentum distribution for events with at least two jets, after the...","name":"Figure 06d - Distribution $p_{T}^{4l}$ with $N_{jets}\\ge$2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed (post-fit) the dijet invariant mass distribution for events with at least two jets, after the...","name":"Figure 06e - Distribution $m_{jj}$ with $N_{jets}\\ge$2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ggF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13TeV....","name":"Figure 07a - Distribution $NN_{ggF}$ in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ggF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13TeV....","name":"Figure 07b - Distribution $NN_{ggF}$ in 0$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category with $NN_{ZZ}$<0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 07c - Distribution $NN_{VBF}$ in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ZZ}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low category with $NN_{ZZ}$>0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 07d - Distribution $NN_{ZZ}$ in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Low"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category with $NN_{ZZ}$<0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 07e - Distribution $NN_{VBF}$ in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ZZ}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med category with $NN_{ZZ}$>0.25 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 07f - Distribution $NN_{ZZ}$ in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-Med"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-High category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13TeV....","name":"Figure 07g - Distribution $NN_{VBF}$ in 1$j$-$p_{T}^{4l}$-High"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$ category with $NN_{VH}$<0.2 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 08a - Distribution $NN_{VBF}$ in 2$j$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$ category with $NN_{VH}$>0.2 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 08b - Distribution $NN_{VH}$ in 2$j$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{VBF}$ output (post-fit) distribution in 2$j$-BSM-like category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13TeV....","name":"Figure 08c - Distribution $NN_{VBF}$ in 2$j$-BSM"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ttH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $ttH$-Had-enriched category with $NN_{tXX}$<0.4 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 08d - Distribution $NN_{ttH}$ in $ttH$-Had"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{tXX}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $ttH$-Had-enriched category with $NN_{tXX}$>0.4 for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$...","name":"Figure 08e - Distribution $NN_{tXX}$ in $ttH$-Had"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed $NN_{ttH}$ output (post-fit) distribution in $VH$-Lep-enriched category for an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ at $\\sqrt{s}$=13TeV....","name":"Figure 08f - Distribution $NN_{ttH}$ in $VH$-Lep"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed events in the categories where no NN discriminant is used for an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 08g - Categories without NN"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and the observed events in the side bands used to constraint the $ZZ^{*}$ and $tXX$ backgrounds for an...","name":"Figure 08h - Sidebands"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected SM cross section $(\\sigma \\cdot BR)_{SM}$, the observed value of $(\\sigma \\cdot BR)$, and their ratio $(\\sigma \\cdot...","name":"Table 08 - STXS Results"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the $ZZ$ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for Production Mode Stage.","name":"Figure 10b - Correlation Matrix for Stage 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the $ZZ$ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for Reduced Stage 1.1.","name":"Figure 10d - Correlation Matrix for Reduced Stage 1.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (ggF,VBF) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11a - $ggF$vs.$VBF$ 68% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (ggF,VBF) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11a - $ggF$vs.$VBF$ 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (ggF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11b - $ggF$vs.$VH$ 68% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (ggF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11b - $ggF$vs.$VH$ 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the (VBF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11c - $VBF$vs.$VH$ 68% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the (VBF,VH) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11c - $VBF$vs.$VH$ 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the ($gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$,$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11d - $gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$vs.$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$ 68% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the ($gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$,$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 11d - $gg2H-0j-p_T^H-Low$vs.$gg2H-0j-p_T^H-High$ 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 68% CLs in the ($\\kappa_{V}$vs.$\\kappa_{F}$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 12 - $\\kappa_{V}$vs.$\\kappa_{F}$ 68% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Likelihood contours at 95% CLs in the ($\\kappa_{V}$vs.$\\kappa_{F}$) plane. The observed best fit value is the first value of the...","name":"Figure 12 - $\\kappa_{V}$vs.$\\kappa_{F}$ 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected signal yield ratio for chosen CP-even and CP-odd EFT parameter values together with the corresponding cross-section measurement in...","name":"Figure 15 - Signal yields for EFT parameters"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected and observed confidence intervals at 68% and 95% CLs of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients for an integrated luminosity...","name":"Table 09 - SMEFT Wilson CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17a - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HB}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17a - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HB}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17b - $c_{HB}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17b - $c_{HB}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{uH}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17c - $c_{uH}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{uH}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 17c - $c_{uH}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"The best-fit values and the corresponding deviation from the SM prediction obtained from two-dimensional likelihood scans of the CP-odd BSM...","name":"Table 10 - BSM couplings"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18a - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18a - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18b - $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18b - $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{\\tilde{u}H}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18c - $c_{\\tilde{u}H}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{\\tilde{u}H}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Figure 18c - $c_{\\tilde{u}H}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance times efficiency, expressed as a percentage, obtained from the ratio of the number of simulated signal events satisfying...","name":"Aux-Fig 06 - Acceptance Stage 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance times efficiency, expressed as a percentage, obtained from the ratio of the number of simulated signal events satisfying...","name":"Aux-Fig 07 - Acceptance Reduced Stage 1.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed covariance matrix for the different parameters of interest when fitting the for Production Mode Stage.","name":"Aux-Fig 08a - Covariance Matrix for Stage 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed covariance matrix for the different parameters of interest when fitting the for Reduced Stage 1.1.","name":"Aux-Fig 08b - Covariance Matrix for Reduced Stage 1.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected SM cross section $(\\sigma\\cdot BR)_{SM}$, the observed value of $(\\sigma\\cdot BR)$, and their ratio $(\\sigma\\cdot BR)/(\\sigma\\cdot BR)_{SM}$ for...","name":"Aux-Table 02 - Alternate Reduced Stage 1.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"The correlation matrices between the measured cross-sections and the ZZ and $tXX$ normalisation factors for alternative Reduced Stage 1.1.","name":"Aux-Fig 10b - Correlation Matrix for Altern.Reduced Stage 1.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15a - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HWB}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15a - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HWB}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15b - $c_{HB}$vs.$c_{HWB}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HB}$ versus $c_{HWB}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15b - $c_{HB}$vs.$c_{HWB}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15c - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HW}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15c - $c_{HW}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HWB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15d -  $c_{HWB}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{HWB}$ versus $c_{HG}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 15d - $c_{HWB}$vs.$c_{HG}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16a - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16a - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16b - $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16b - $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16c - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16c - $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Obs. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16d - $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Exp. 95% CLs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.94311.v1/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed 2D-fit likelihood curves at the 95% CLs for the $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$ versus $c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ coupling parameters at an integrated luminosity of...","name":"Aux-Fig 16d - $c_{H\\tilde{W}B}$vs.$c_{H\\tilde{G}}$ Obs. 95% CLs"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1790250?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/94311"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the $4\\ell$ decay channel at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1790250?version=1","version":1}