{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/1994864"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)156","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2022","description":"The first collider search for dark matter arising from a strongly coupled hidden sector is presented, using a data sample corresponding to $138\\,\\text{fb}^{-1}$, collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC, at a center-of-mass energy of $13\\,\\text{TeV}$. The hidden sector is hypothesized to couple to the standard model (SM) via a heavy leptophobic $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ mediator, which would be produced as a resonance in proton-proton collisions. The mediator decay results in two \"semivisible\" jets, containing both visible matter and invisible dark matter. The final state therefore includes moderate missing energy aligned with one of the jets, a signature ignored by most dark matter searches. The observed dijet transverse mass spectra are smoothly falling, as expected from the SM; no structure compatible with the signal is observed. Assuming the $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ and SM Z bosons have the same couplings to the SM quarks, an inclusive search, relevant to any model that exhibits this kinematic behavior, excludes mediator masses of 1.5--$4.0\\,\\text{TeV}$ at 95% confidence level, depending on the other signal model parameters. To enhance the sensitivity of the search for this particular class of hidden sector models, a boosted decision tree (BDT) is trained using jet substructure variables to distinguish between semivisible jets and SM jets from background processes. When the BDT is employed to identify each jet in the dijet system as semivisible, the mediator mass exclusion increases to $5.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, for wider ranges of the other signal model parameters.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the characteristic variable $R_{\\text{T}}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on...","name":"Figure 2a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the characteristic variable $\\Delta\\phi_{\\text{min}}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on...","name":"Figure 2b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $m_{\\text{SD}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets from the simulated SM backgrounds...","name":"Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $D_{p_{\\text{T}}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets from the simulated SM backgrounds...","name":"Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized BDT discriminator distribution for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets from the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models.","name":"Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The BDT ROC curves for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets, comparing the simulated SM backgrounds with one signal model with...","name":"Figure 4b (signal vs. QCD)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The BDT ROC curves for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets, comparing the simulated SM backgrounds with one signal model with...","name":"Figure 4b (signal vs. $\\text{t}\\overline{\\text{t}}$)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The BDT ROC curves for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets, comparing the simulated SM backgrounds with one signal model with...","name":"Figure 4b (signal vs. W+jets)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The BDT ROC curves for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ jets, comparing the simulated SM backgrounds with one signal model with...","name":"Figure 4b (signal vs. Z+jets)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{\\text{T}}$ distribution for the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, comparing the observed data to the background prediction from the analytic fit...","name":"Figure 5a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{\\text{T}}$ distribution for the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, comparing the observed data to the background prediction from the analytic fit...","name":"Figure 5b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{\\text{T}}$ distribution for the high-SVJ2 signal region, comparing the observed data to the background prediction from the analytic fit...","name":"Figure 6a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{\\text{T}}$ distribution for the low-SVJ2 signal region, comparing the observed data to the background prediction from the analytic fit...","name":"Figure 6b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the inclusive search...","name":"Figure 7a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Median expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Median expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Observed exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Observed exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7a (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the inclusive search...","name":"Figure 7b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Median expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Observed exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 7b (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the BDT-based search...","name":"Figure 8a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Median expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Median expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Median expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Observed exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Observed exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Observed exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Observed exclusion contour 4)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8a (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL observed upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the BDT-based search...","name":"Figure 8b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Median expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Median expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Median expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Observed exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Observed exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 68 expected exclusion contour 4)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 68% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Upper 68 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 2)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 3)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"The lower 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Lower 95 expected exclusion contour 4)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"The upper 95% expected exclusion for the nominal $\\text{Z}^{\\prime}$ cross section.","name":"Figure 8b (Upper 95 expected exclusion contour 1)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the inclusive search for...","name":"Figure 7c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the BDT-based search for...","name":"Figure 8c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"The three two-dimensional signal model parameter scans.","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"Metrics representing the performance of the BDT for the benchmark signal model ($m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 3.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} = 20\\,\\text{GeV}$, $r_{\\text{inv}} =...","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"The range of effects on the signal yield for each systematic uncertainty and the total. Values less than 0.01% are...","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the variable $m_{\\text{T}}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on this...","name":"Supplementary Figure 1a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the variable $\\Delta\\eta(\\text{J}_{1},\\text{J}_{2})$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on this...","name":"Supplementary Figure 1b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the variable $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\text{miss}}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The $R_{\\text{T}}$ requirement is...","name":"Supplementary Figure 1c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the variable $N_{\\text{e}}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on this...","name":"Supplementary Figure 1d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of the variable $N_{\\mu}$ for the simulated SM backgrounds and several signal models. The requirement on this...","name":"Supplementary Figure 1e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of $\\Delta\\eta(\\text{J}_{1},\\text{J}_{2})$ vs. $R_{\\text{T}}$ for the simulated QCD background. The preselection requirements on both variables are omitted,...","name":"Supplementary Figure 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of $p_{\\text{T}}^{\\text{miss}}$ vs. $m_{\\text{T}}$ for the simulated QCD background. All selection requirements are omitted, except for the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distribution of $R_{\\text{T}}$ vs. $m_{\\text{T}}$ for the simulated QCD background. All selection requirements are omitted, except for the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $\\tau_{21}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $\\tau_{32}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 4b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $N_{2}^{(1)}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 4c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $N_{3}^{(1)}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 4d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $g_{\\text{jet}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 5a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $\\sigma_{\\text{major}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 5b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $\\sigma_{\\text{minor}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 5c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $\\Delta\\phi(\\vec{J},\\vec{p}_{\\text{T}}^{\\text{miss}})$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 5d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $f_{\\text{h}^{\\pm}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 6a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $f_{\\text{e}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 6b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $f_{\\mu}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 6c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $f_{\\text{h}^{0}}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 6d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"The normalized distributions of the BDT input variable $f_{\\gamma}$ for the two highest $p_{\\text{T}}$ wide jets from the simulated SM...","name":"Supplementary Figure 6e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 7a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 7b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 7c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 8a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 8b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t101","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 8c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t102","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 9a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t103","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 9b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t104","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the high-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 9c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t105","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 10a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t106","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 10b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t107","@type":"Dataset","description":"The product of signal acceptance and efficiency in the low-SVJ2 signal region, for variations of the mediator mass and the...","name":"Supplementary Figure 10c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t108","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of different the dijet mass $m_{\\text{J}\\text{J}}$, the transverse mass $m_{\\text{T}}$, and the Monte Carlo (MC) mass $m_{\\text{MC}}$ for a...","name":"Supplementary Figure 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t109","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $m_{\\text{dark}}$ values for the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 12a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t110","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $m_{\\text{dark}}$ values for the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 12b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t111","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $r_{\\text{inv}}$ values for the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 13a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t112","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $r_{\\text{inv}}$ values for the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 13b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t113","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $\\alpha_{\\text{dark}}$ values for the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 14a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t114","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{\\text{T}}$ distributions for signal models with different $\\alpha_{\\text{dark}}$ values for the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ inclusive signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 14b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t115","@type":"Dataset","description":"The proportions of each SM background process in the high-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 15a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t116","@type":"Dataset","description":"The proportions of each SM background process in the low-$R_{\\text{T}}$ signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 15b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t117","@type":"Dataset","description":"The proportions of each SM background process in the high-SVJ2 signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 16a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t118","@type":"Dataset","description":"The proportions of each SM background process in the low-SVJ2 signal region.","name":"Supplementary Figure 16b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t119","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the inclusive search...","name":"Supplementary Figure 17a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t120","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the inclusive search...","name":"Supplementary Figure 17b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t121","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the BDT-based search...","name":"Supplementary Figure 18a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t122","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% CL expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction from the BDT-based search...","name":"Supplementary Figure 18b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t123","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for the major background processes. Statistical uncertainties, at...","name":"Supplementary Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t124","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 2.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, varying $m_{\\text{dark}}$...","name":"Supplementary Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t125","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 3.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, varying $m_{\\text{dark}}$...","name":"Supplementary Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t126","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 4.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, varying $m_{\\text{dark}}$...","name":"Supplementary Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t127","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 2.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t128","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 3.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t129","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 4.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t130","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 2.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t131","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 3.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.115426.v3/t132","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative efficiencies in % for each step of the event selection process for signals with $m_{\\text{Z}^{\\prime}} = 4.1\\,\\text{TeV}$, $m_{\\text{dark}} =...","name":"Supplementary Table 10"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1994864?version=3"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/115426"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1994864?version=3","version":3}