{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2141752"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)077","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2024","description":"Inclusive and differential measurements of the top-antitop ($t\\bar{t}$) charge asymmetry $A_\\text{C}^{t\\bar{t}}$ and the leptonic asymmetry $A_\\text{C}^{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ are presented in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The measurement uses the complete run 2 data set, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$, combines data in the single-lepton and dilepton channels, and employs reconstruction techniques adapted to both the resolved and boosted topologies.A Bayesian unfolding procedure is performed to correct for detector resolution and acceptance effects. The combined inclusive $t\\bar{t}$ charge asymmetry is measured as $A_\\text{C}^{t\\bar{t}} = 0.0068 \\pm 0.0015$, which differs from zero by 4.7~standard deviations. Differential measurements are performed as a function of the invariant mass, transverse momentum and longitudinal boost of the $t\\bar{t}$ system. Both inclusive and differential measurements are found to be compatible with the Standard Model predictions, at next-to-next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics perturbation theory with next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections.The measurements are interpreted in the framework of the Standard Model effective field theory, deriving competitive bounds on several Wilson coefficients.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -...","name":"Table of contents"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded inclusive charge asymmetry. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated...","name":"Results for charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the top pair system. The measured values...","name":"Results for charge asymmetry vs mtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values...","name":"Results for charge asymmetry vs pttt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values...","name":"Results for charge asymmetry vs betatt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\\Delta |\\eta_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}||<2.5$....","name":"Results for leptonic charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ is...","name":"Results for leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ is...","name":"Results for leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ is...","name":"Results for leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of...","name":"Bounds on Wilson coefficients charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of...","name":"Bounds on Wilson coefficients charge asymmetry vs mtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs betatt bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs betatt bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs betatt bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs betatt bin 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs mtt bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs mtt bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs mtt bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs mtt bin 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs mtt bin 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs pttt bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ $\\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs pttt bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking charge asymmetry vs pttt bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall bin 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll bin 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll bin 0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ $\\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll bin 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect...","name":"NP ranking leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll bin 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations charge asymmetry vs mtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations charge asymmetry vs pttt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations charge asymmetry vs betatt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations leptonic charge asymmetry inclusive"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.","name":"NP correlations leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix charge asymmetry vs mtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix charge asymmetry vs pttt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\\bar{t}}$ vs $\\beta_{z,t\\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix charge asymmetry vs betatt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $m_{\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix leptonic charge asymmetry vs mll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix leptonic charge asymmetry vs ptll"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132116.v2/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\\ell\\ell}$ vs $\\beta_{z,\\ell\\bar{\\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.","name":"Covariance matrix leptonic charge asymmetry vs betall"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2141752?version=2"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/132116"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Evidence for the charge asymmetry in $pp \\rightarrow t\\bar{t}$ production at $\\sqrt{s}= 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2141752?version=2","version":2}