{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2142913"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032008","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2022","description":"CERN-LHC.  Measurements of the differential cross sections for ttZ and ttH productions with a boosted Z or Higgs boson using the Z/H to bbar, and semileptonic ttbar decay channel in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with 138 fb^-1 of data collected in 2016-2018.\n\nThe fiducial region is defined as:\n- Missing transverse momentum (MET) > 20 GeV\n- 1 AK8 jet, where transverse momentum (pT) > 200 GeV, |eta| < 2.4, 50 < softdrop mass < 200 \n- 1 electron or muon, where pT(e) > 30 (35) GeV in 2016 (2017 and 2018), pT(mu) > 30 GeV, |eta(e)| < 2.5, |eta(mu)| < 2.4\n- 1 Z or Higgs boson candidate AK8 jet, where Highest DeepAK8MD bbvL score > 0.8\n- at least 5 AK4 jets, where pT > 30 GeV, |eta| < 2.4\n- at least 2 b-tagged AK4 jets, where identified with DeepCSV at the medium working point, deltaR(Z/H boson candidate, b-tagged jet) > 0.8","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\mu_{\\text{ttH}}, \\mu_{\\text{ttZ}}$ for a Z or Higgs boson with a simulated pT $> 200$GeV","name":"Figure 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{t}\\varphi}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (ctp, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (cpqm, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{3}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (cpq3, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{t}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (cpt, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{tb}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (cptb, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{tW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (ctw, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{bW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (cbw, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 9 (ctz, other WCs fixed)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{t}\\varphi}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (ctp, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (cpqm, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{3}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (cpq3, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{t}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (cpt, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{tb}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (cptb, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{tW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (ctw, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{bW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (cbw, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.","name":"Figure 10 (ctz, other WCs float)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{t}}, \\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 11 (cpt vs cpqm)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{3}, \\text{c}_{\\varphi\\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 11 (cpq3 vs cpqm)"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.127700.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Negative log-likelihood difference in $\\text{c}_{\\text{tW}}, \\text{c}_{\\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.","name":"Figure 11 (ctw vs ctz)"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2142913?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/127700"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for new physics using effective field theory in 13 TeV pp collision events that contain a top quark pair and a boosted Z or Higgs boson","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2142913?version=1","version":1}