{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2514114"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11582-z","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2023","description":"Version of twMeT HEPData record as of 09.12.2022.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -...","name":"Overview"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"highst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"highst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"highst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"highst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"highst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"highst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"highst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"highst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"lowst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"lowst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"lowst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"lowst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"lowst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"lowst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"0LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"1LBoosted_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_highst_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_highst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_highst_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_highst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_highst_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_highst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mamh_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_highst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_lowst_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_lowst_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_lowst_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_a$ vs. $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ and assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"2L_lowst_dmtt_mamh_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 150...","name":"2L_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_lowma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ and assuming $m_a$ = 250...","name":"2L_lowst_dmtt_mhtb_highma_exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t101","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t102","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t103","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t104","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_Comb_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t105","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t106","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t107","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t108","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t109","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t110","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t111","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t112","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t113","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t114","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t115","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t116","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_0L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t117","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t118","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t119","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t120","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t121","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t122","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p7_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t123","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t124","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t125","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t126","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_a$ vs. $ m_{H^{\\pm}}$ signal grid assuming tan$\\beta$ = 1,...","name":"mamH_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t127","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 150 GeV,...","name":"mHtblow_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t128","@type":"Dataset","description":"Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $m_{H^{\\pm}}$ vs. tan$\\beta$ signal grid assuming $m_a$ = 250 GeV,...","name":"mHtbhigh_xSecUpperLimit_1L_st0p35_DMtt"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t129","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $m_{\\mathrm{b1},\\mathrm{W-tagged}}$ in the 0L inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total SM...","name":"SR0L_mwtagged"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t130","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $m_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{b,E_{\\mathrm{T}^{\\mathrm{miss}}}}}$ in the 0L inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total SM...","name":"SR0L_mtbmet"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t131","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $N_{\\mathrm{W-tagged}}$ in the 0L inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total SM...","name":"SR0L_nwtagged"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t132","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $m_{\\mathrm{b1},\\mathrm{\\cancel{b1}}}$ in the hadronic top inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total...","name":"SR1L_Had_mbj"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t133","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $m_{\\mathrm{b1},\\mathrm{\\cancel{b1}}}$ in the leptonic top inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total...","name":"SR1L_Lep_nwtaggged"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t134","@type":"Dataset","description":"The distributions of $m_{\\mathrm{b1},\\mathrm{\\cancel{b1}}}$ in the leptonic top inclusive signal region. For each bin yields for the data and total...","name":"SR1L_Lep_mbj"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t135","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow for the reference point $(\\it{m}_{\\mathrm{H^{\\pm}}}, \\it{m}_{a}, tan\\beta, sin\\theta )=$ (500,100,1,0.7) , (800,150,20,0.7), (600,250,30,0.7), (1000,400,1,0.7) in 0L regions. Results are...","name":"cutflow_SR0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t136","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow for the reference point $(\\it{m}_{\\mathrm{H^{\\pm}}}, \\it{m}_{a}, tan\\beta, sin\\theta )=$ (500,100,1,0.7) , (800,150,20,0.7), (600,250,30,0.7), (1000,400,1,0.7) in 1L leptonic top regions....","name":"cutflow_SR1L_Lep"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t137","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow for the reference point $(\\it{m}_{\\mathrm{H^{\\pm}}}, \\it{m}_{a}, tan\\beta, sin\\theta )=$ (500,100,1,0.7) , (800,150,20,0.7), (600,250,30,0.7), (1000,400,1,0.7) in 1L hadronic top regions....","name":"cutflow_SR1L_Had"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t138","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"highst_grid1_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t139","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"highst_grid1_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t140","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid2_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t141","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid2_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t142","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid3_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t143","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid3_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t144","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"highst_grid1_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t145","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"highst_grid1_Eff_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t146","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid2_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t147","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid2_Eff_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t148","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid3_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t149","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"highst_grid3_Eff_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t150","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"lowst_grid1_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t151","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"lowst_grid1_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t152","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid2_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t153","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid2_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t154","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid3_Acc_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t155","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 0L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid3_Eff_0L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t156","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"lowst_grid1_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t157","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_a$--m$_{H^{\\pm}}$ assuming tan$\\beta$ =...","name":"lowst_grid1_Eff_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t158","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid2_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t159","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid2_Eff_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t160","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal acceptance in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid3_Acc_1L"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.136029.v1/t161","@type":"Dataset","description":"Signal efficiency in the 1L region for 2HDM+a model DM signals on the plane defined by m$_{H^{\\pm}}$--tan$\\beta$ assuming m$_a$ =...","name":"lowst_grid3_Eff_1L"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2514114?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/136029"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark and an energetic $W$ boson in $\\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2514114?version=1","version":1}