{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2639338"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11687-5","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"TOTEM Collaboration"}],"creator":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"TOTEM Collaboration"}],"datePublished":"2023","description":"A generic search is presented for the associated production of a Z boson or a photon with an additional unspecified massive particle X,${\\rm pp}\\rightarrow {\\rm pp} +{\\rm Z}/\\gamma+{\\rm X}$, in proton-tagged events from proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13\\TeV$, recorded in 2017 with the CMS detector and the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer. The missing mass spectrum is analysed in the 600--1600 GeV range and a fit is performed to search for possible deviations from the background expectation. No significant excess in data with respect to the background predictions has been observed. Model-independent upper limits on the visible production cross section of ${\\rm pp}\\rightarrow {\\rm pp} +{\\rm Z}/\\gamma+{\\rm X}$ are set.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $m_{miss}$ shapes for the simulated signal events within the fiducial region and those outside it, after including...","name":"Figure 2 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $m_{miss}$ shapes for the simulated signal events within the fiducial region and those outside it, after including...","name":"Figure 2 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $m_{miss}$ shapes for the simulated signal events within the fiducial region and those outside it, after including...","name":"Figure 2 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the $m_{miss}$ shapes for the simulated signal events within the fiducial region and those outside it, after including...","name":"Figure 2 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of the acceptance times the combined reconstruction and identification efficiency, as a function of $m_{X}$ , for events generated...","name":"Figure 3 left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Product of the acceptance times the combined reconstruction and identification efficiency, as a function of $m_{X}$ , for different proton...","name":"Figure 3 right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the negative arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the positive arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 upper center"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed di-proton rapidity from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are compared to data. The...","name":"Figure 4 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the negative arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 middle left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the positive arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 middle center"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed di-proton rapidity from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are compared to data. The...","name":"Figure 4 middle right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the negative arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed proton $\\xi$ in the positive arm from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are...","name":"Figure 4 lower center"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distributions of the reconstructed di-proton rapidity from the proton mixing procedure with simulated MC events, are compared to data. The...","name":"Figure 4 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Validation of the background modelling method, using the $e\\mu$ control sample. Selected $e\\mu$ events are mixed with protons from $Z\\rightarrow...","name":"Figure 5 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Validation of the background modelling method, using the $e\\mu$ control sample. Selected $e\\mu$ events are mixed with protons from $Z\\rightarrow...","name":"Figure 5 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Validation of the background modelling method, using the $e\\mu$ control sample. Selected $e\\mu$ events are mixed with protons from $Z\\rightarrow...","name":"Figure 5 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Validation of the background modelling method, using the $e\\mu$ control sample. Selected $e\\mu$ events are mixed with protons from $Z\\rightarrow...","name":"Figure 5 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZeeX$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after the...","name":"Figure 6 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZeeX$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after the...","name":"Figure 6 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZeeX$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after the...","name":"Figure 6 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZeeX$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after the...","name":"Figure 6 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ\\mu\\mu X$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 7 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ\\mu\\mu X$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 7 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ\\mu\\mu X$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 7 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ\\mu\\mu X$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 7 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow pp\\gamma X$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 8 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow pp\\gamma X$, with the protons reconstructed with the multi(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 8 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow pp\\gamma X$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-multi(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 8 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"$m_{miss}$ distributions in the $pp\\rightarrow pp\\gamma X$, with the protons reconstructed with the single(+z)-single(-z)method. The background distributions are shown after...","name":"Figure 8 lower right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ/\\gamma X$ cross section at 95% CL, as a function of $m_X$. The 68 and...","name":"Figure 9 upper left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ/\\gamma X$ cross section at 95% CL, as a function of $m_X$. The 68 and...","name":"Figure 9 upper right"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ/\\gamma X$ cross section at 95% CL, as a function of $m_X$. The 68 and...","name":"Figure 9 lower left"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.135797.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits on the $pp\\rightarrow ppZ/\\gamma X$ cross section at 95% CL, as a function of $m_X$. The 68 and...","name":"Figure 9 lower right"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2639338?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/135797"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"A search for new physics in central exclusive production using the missing mass technique with the CMS detector and the CMS-TOTEM precision proton spectrometer","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2639338?version=1","version":1}