{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2642282"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034907","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"STAR Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"STAR Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2023","description":"We report the measurement of $K^{*0}$ meson at midrapidity ($|y|<$ 1.0) in Au+Au collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\rm NN}}$~=~7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27 and 39 GeV collected by the STAR experiment during the RHIC beam energy scan (BES) program. The transverse momentum spectra, yield, and average transverse momentum of $K^{*0}$ are presented as functions of collision centrality and beam energy. The $K^{*0}/K$ yield ratios are presented for different collision centrality intervals and beam energies. The $K^{*0}/K$ ratio in heavy-ion collisions are observed to be smaller than that in small system collisions (e+e and p+p). The $K^{*0}/K$ ratio follows a similar centrality dependence to that observed in previous RHIC and LHC measurements. The data favor the scenario of the dominance of hadronic re-scattering over regeneration for $K^{*0}$ production in the hadronic phase of the medium.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-20%).","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-40%).","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-10%).","name":"Table 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 10-20%).","name":"Table 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-30%).","name":"Table 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 30-40%).","name":"Table 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-10%).","name":"Table 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 10-20%).","name":"Table 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-30%).","name":"Table 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 30-40%).","name":"Table 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-10%).","name":"Table 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 10-20%).","name":"Table 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-30%).","name":"Table 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 30-40%).","name":"Table 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-10%).","name":"Table 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 10-20%).","name":"Table 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-30%).","name":"Table 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 30-40%).","name":"Table 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 0-10%).","name":"Table 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 10-20%).","name":"Table 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 20-30%).","name":"Table 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 30-40%).","name":"Table 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 40-60%).","name":"Table 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$-differential yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV (Multiplicity class 60-80%).","name":"Table 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"$p_{\\mathrm T}$- integrated yield of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV. Total systematic...","name":"Table 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 44"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 45"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"&lt;$p_{\\mathrm T}$&gt; of $\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV. Total systematic error is...","name":"Table 46"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 47"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 48"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 49"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 50"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 51"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV. Total systematic error is the...","name":"Table 52"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum...","name":"Table 53"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~11.5 GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum...","name":"Table 54"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum of...","name":"Table 55"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum...","name":"Table 56"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum...","name":"Table 57"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{\\mathrm{K^{*0}} + \\bar{\\mathrm{K^{*0}}}}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. $&lt;(dN_{ch}/dy)^{1/3}&gt;$ in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV. Total systematic error is the quadrature sum...","name":"Table 58"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{2\\phi}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV","name":"Table 59"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{2\\phi}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV","name":"Table 60"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{2\\phi}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV","name":"Table 61"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{2\\phi}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV","name":"Table 62"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"$\\frac{2\\phi}{K^{+} + K^{-}}$ vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV","name":"Table 63"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$7.7 GeV","name":"Table 64"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$11.5 GeV","name":"Table 65"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$14.5 GeV","name":"Table 66"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$19.6 GeV","name":"Table 67"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$27 GeV","name":"Table 68"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$39 GeV","name":"Table 69"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$62.4 GeV","name":"Table 70"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.134956.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"lower limit of hadronic phase lifetime vs. &lt; Npart &gt; in AuAu collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\mathrm{NN}}}~=~$200 GeV","name":"Table 71"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2642282?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/134956"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"$K^{*0}$ production in Au+Au collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\rm NN}}$ = 7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27 and 39 GeV from RHIC beam energy scan","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2642282?version=1","version":1}