{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2808023"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.121801","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"A search is performed for dark matter particles produced in association with a resonantly produced pair of b-quarks with $30< m_{bb}<150$ GeV using 140 $fb^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. This signature is expected in extensions of the Standard Model predicting the production of dark matter particles, in particular those containing a dark Higgs boson s that decays into $b\\bar{b}$. The highly boosted s $\\rightarrow b\\bar{b}$ topology is reconstructed using jet reclustering and a new identification algorithm. This search places stringent constraints across regions of the dark Higgs model parameter space that satisfy the observed relic density, excluding dark Higgs bosons with masses between 30 and 150 GeV in benchmark scenarios with Z' mediator masses up to 4.8 TeV at 95% confidence level.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Data and predicted SM background yields after a simultaneous background-only fit to each resolved (Res.) and merged (Mer.) SR and...","name":"Figure 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{bb}$ distributions for data and SM expectations in the Resolved SR with 150 GeV < $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ < 200 GeV...","name":"Figure 3a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{bb}$ distributions for data and SM expectations in the Resolved SR with 200 GeV < $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ < 350 GeV...","name":"Figure 3b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{bb}$ distributions for data and SM expectations in the Resolved SR with 350 GeV < $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ < 500 GeV...","name":"Figure 3c"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{bb}$ distributions for data and SM expectations in the Merged SR with 500 GeV < $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ < 750 GeV...","name":"Figure 3d"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $m_{bb}$ distributions for data and SM expectations in the Merged SR with 750 GeV < $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ region after a...","name":"Figure 3e"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm2\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSbb analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 obs MonoSbb"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSbb analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp MonoSbb"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSWW analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 obs MonoSWW"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSWW analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp MonoSWW"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSVV analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 obs MonoSVV"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL from MonoSVV analysis for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 int1 exp MonoSVV"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The observed relic density line for scenario 1.","name":"Figure 4 relic"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL scenario 2.","name":"Figure 4 int2 obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 2.","name":"Figure 4 int2 exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 2.","name":"Figure 4 int2 exp1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm2\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 2.","name":"Figure 4 int2 exp2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion region at 95% CL scenario 3.","name":"Figure 4 int3 obs"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 3.","name":"Figure 4 int3 exp"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 3.","name":"Figure 4 int3 exp1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"The $\\pm2\\sigma$ expected exclusion region at 95% CL for scenario 3.","name":"Figure 4 int3 exp2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Relative importance of the different sources of uncertainty for three selected signals in scenario 1: (a) $m_{\\text{Z'}}$ = 3000 GeV,...","name":"Table 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Background yields and comparison with data for the signal regions (SRs) in different $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ categories after a background-only fit to...","name":"Table 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Background yields and comparison with data for the one-muon control regions (1$\\mu$-CRs) in different $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ categories after a background-only fit...","name":"Table 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.158372.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Background yields and comparison with data for the two-lepton control regions (2$\\ell$-CRs) in different $E_T^{\\text{miss}}$ categories after a background-only fit...","name":"Table 4"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2808023?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/158372"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson in the $b\\bar{b}$ final state using $pp$ collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2808023?version=1","version":1}