{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2810563"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2025)010","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"Differential measurements of Higgs boson production in the $\\tau$-lepton-pair decay channel are presented in the gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion (VBF), $VH$ and $t\\bar{t}H$ associated production modes, with particular focus on the VBF production mode. The data used to perform the measurements correspond to 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Two methods are used to perform the measurements: the Simplified Template Cross-Section (STXS) approach and an Unfolded Fiducial Differential measurement considering only the VBF phase space. For the STXS measurement, events are categorized by their production mode and kinematic properties such as the Higgs boson's transverse momentum ($p^{\\text{H}}_\\text{T}$), the number of jets produced in association with the Higgs boson, or the invariant mass of the two leading jets ($m_{jj}$). For the VBF production mode, the ratio of the measured cross-section to the Standard Model prediction for $m_{jj}>1.5$ TeV and $p^{\\text{H}}_\\text{T}>200$ GeV ($p^{\\text{H}}_\\text{T}<200$ GeV) is ${1.29}^{+0.39}_{-0.34}$ (${0.12}^{+0.34}_{-0.33}$). This is the first VBF measurement for the higher-$p^{\\text{H}}_\\text{T}$ criteria, and the most precise for the lower-$p^{\\text{H}}_\\text{T}$ criteria. The fiducial cross-section measurements, which only consider the kinematic properties of the event, are performed as functions of variables characterizing the VBF topology, such as the signed $\\Delta\\phi_{jj}$ between the two leading jets. The measurements have a precision of 30%-50% and agree well with the Standard Model predictions. These results are interpreted in the SMEFT framework, and place the strongest constraints to date on the CP-odd Wilson coefficient $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}&lt;200$ GeV. The...","name":"Fig. 02a: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}<200$ GeV, VBF0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}&gt;200$ GeV. The...","name":"Fig. 02b: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}>200$ GeV, VBF0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}&lt;200$ GeV. The...","name":"Fig. 02c: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}<200$ GeV, VBF1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}&gt;200$ GeV. The...","name":"Fig. 02d: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}>200$ GeV, VBF1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}&lt;1$ TeV. The...","name":"Fig. 03a: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV, VBF0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}&gt;1$ TeV. The...","name":"Fig. 03b: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV, VBF0"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}&lt;1$ TeV. The...","name":"Fig. 03c: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV, VBF1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of the reconstructed $\\tau\\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\\tau\\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}&gt;1$ TeV. The...","name":"Fig. 03d: $m_{\\tau\\tau}$ for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV, VBF1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison of the observed and expected event yields in the ttH categories. The window category contains events with $m_{\\tau\\tau} \\in...","name":"Fig. 04: Yields in the ttH categories"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured values of $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit....","name":"Fig. 05: $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$, incl."},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured values for $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\\pm1\\sigma$...","name":"Fig. 06: $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$, STXS"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Upper limits at 95% CL on simplified template cross-sections in the individual ttH $p_{\\text{T}}^{H}$ bins relative to their SM expectation...","name":"Fig. 08: 95% CL on ttH STXS categories"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\\text{T}(j_0)$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8,...","name":"Fig. 10a: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{dp_\\text{T}(j_0)}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\\text{T}^{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8,...","name":"Fig. 10b: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{dp_\\text{T}^{H}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\\Delta\\phi_{jj}^{\\text{signed}}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8,...","name":"Fig. 10c: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{d\\Delta\\phi_{jj}^{\\text{signed}}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\\Delta\\phi_{jj}^{\\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\\text{T}^\\text{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from...","name":"Fig. 10d: $\\frac{d^{2}\\sigma}{d\\Delta\\phi_{jj}dp_{T}^{H}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of...","name":"Fig. 11a: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{d\\Delta\\phi_{jj}}$, EFT"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of...","name":"Fig. 11b: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{d\\Delta\\phi_{jj}}$, EFT"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of...","name":"Fig. 11c: $\\frac{d^{2}\\sigma}{d\\Delta\\phi_{jj}dp_{T}^{H}}$, EFT"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of...","name":"Fig. 11d: $\\frac{d\\sigma}{dp_\\text{T}^{H}}$, EFT"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually...","name":"Fig. 12a: 95% CL on CP-even Wilson coefficients"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually...","name":"Fig. 12b: 95% CL on CP-odd Wilson coefficients"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{HB}$ using only the SM-dimension-6...","name":"Fig. 13a: 2D 95% CL, $c_{HW}$ and $c_{HB}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ and $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6...","name":"Fig. 13b: 2D 95% CL, $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ and $c_{H\\tilde{B}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6...","name":"Fig. 13c: 2D 95% CL, $c_{HW}$ and $c_{H\\tilde{W}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected values of $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit....","name":"Fig. 03 aux: $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$, exp."},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"The expected values for $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\\pm1\\sigma$...","name":"Fig. 04 aux: $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$, exp."},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured values for $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$ in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\\pm1\\sigma$ uncertainty in the measurement is...","name":"Fig. 05 aux: $\\sigma_{H}\\times B(H\\rightarrow\\tau\\tau)$, STXS"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\\alpha$, for the $Z(\\to\\tau\\tau) + \\text{jets}$ and top...","name":"Fig. 12a aux: Correlation, $p_\\text{T}(j_0)$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\\alpha$, for the $Z(\\to\\tau\\tau) + \\text{jets}$ and top...","name":"Fig. 12b aux: Correlation, $p_\\text{T}^{H}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\\alpha$, for the $Z(\\to\\tau\\tau) + \\text{jets}$ and top...","name":"Fig. 12c aux: Correlation, $\\Delta\\phi_{jj}^{\\text{signed}}$"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.157351.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\\alpha$, for the $Z(\\to\\tau\\tau) + \\text{jets}$ and top...","name":"Fig. 12d aux: Correlation, $\\Delta\\phi_{jj}$ vs $p_\\text{T}^{H}$"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2810563?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/157351"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Differential cross-section measurements of Higgs boson production in the $H\\to\\tau^+\\tau^-$ decay channel in $pp$ collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2810563?version=1","version":1}