{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2842361"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2025)193","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"ATLAS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"The paper presents a search for supersymmetric particles produced in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and jets originating from charm quarks. The data were taken with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN from 2015 to 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess of events over the expected Standard Model background expectation is observed in optimized signal regions, and limits are set on the production cross-sections of the supersymmetric particles. Pair production of charm squarks or top squarks, each decaying into a charm quark and the lightest supersymmetric particle $\\tilde{\\chi}_1^0$, is excluded at 95% confidence level for squarks with masses up to 900 GeV for scenarios where the mass of $\\tilde{\\chi}_1^0$ is below 50 GeV. Additionally, the production of leptoquarks with masses up to 900 GeV is excluded for the scenario where up-type leptoquarks decay into a charm quark and a neutrino. Model-independent limits on cross-sections and event yields for processes beyond the Standard Model are also reported.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Summary of material in this HEPData record.  Truth Code snippets, SLHA files, Madgraph process cards and UFO files for...","name":"Overview"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.","name":"Contour 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 25"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 28"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 30"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 31"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 32"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 33"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 34"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 35"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 36"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 37"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 38"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 39"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 40"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 41"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 42"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 43"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t45","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 44"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t46","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 45"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t47","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 46"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t48","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 47"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t49","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 48"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t50","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when...","name":"Contour 49"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t51","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only...","name":"Contour 50"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t52","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1...","name":"Contour 51"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t53","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 52"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t54","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 53"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t55","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1...","name":"Contour 54"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t56","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 55"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t57","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 56"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t58","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200...","name":"Contour 57"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t59","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 58"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t60","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 59"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t61","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200...","name":"Contour 60"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t62","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 61"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t63","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and...","name":"Contour 62"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t64","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 63"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t65","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 64"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t66","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second...","name":"Contour 65"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t67","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 66"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t68","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 67"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t69","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second...","name":"Contour 68"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t70","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 69"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t71","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 70"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t72","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.","name":"Contour 71"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t73","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(+1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 72"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t74","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit $(-1\\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and...","name":"Contour 73"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t75","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.","name":"Contour 74"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t76","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limit on the cross-section at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying into charm quarks and...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t77","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limit on the cross-section for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t78","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limit on the cross-section for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.","name":"Cross-section upper limit 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t79","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(-1\\sigma)$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t80","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(+1\\sigma)$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t81","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding to...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t82","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding to...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t83","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(-1\\sigma)$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t84","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(+1\\sigma)$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t85","@type":"Dataset","description":"Expected upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding to...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t86","@type":"Dataset","description":"Observed upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with $\\beta_{23}=1$, corresponding to...","name":"Cross-section upper limit 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t87","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $R_{\\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp-1c showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The...","name":"SR distribution 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t88","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $E_\\mathrm{T}^\\mathrm{miss}\\mathrm{ Sig.}$ in SR-HM1 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions....","name":"SR distribution 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t89","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $m_{\\mathrm{T}}^{\\mathrm{min}}(c)$ in SR-HM2 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The...","name":"SR distribution 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t90","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $R_{\\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp1 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The...","name":"SR distribution 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t91","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $R_{\\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp2 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The...","name":"SR distribution 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t92","@type":"Dataset","description":"Distribution of $R_{\\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp3 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The...","name":"SR distribution 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t93","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp-1c.","name":"Acceptance 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t94","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t95","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t96","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t97","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t98","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp1.","name":"Acceptance 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t99","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp2.","name":"Acceptance 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t100","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp3.","name":"Acceptance 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t101","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t102","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t103","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t104","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t105","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t106","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t107","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t108","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t109","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t110","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t111","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t112","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t113","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t114","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t115","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t116","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t117","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t118","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t119","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t120","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t121","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t122","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t123","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t124","@type":"Dataset","description":"Efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can...","name":"Efficiency 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t125","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp-1c.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t126","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t127","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t128","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t129","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t130","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t131","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t132","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t133","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t134","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t135","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t136","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{21}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t137","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 13"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t138","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t139","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t140","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency across the $\\mathrm{LQ}^\\mathrm{u}_{22}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t141","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t142","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t143","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t144","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,min}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t145","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM1.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t146","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM2.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t147","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM3.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t148","@type":"Dataset","description":"Acceptance times efficiency for the $\\mathrm{vLQ}^\\mathrm{u,YM}_{23}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.","name":"Acceptance times efficiency 24"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t149","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-Comp-1c using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (450,430)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t150","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-Comp1 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (600,550)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t151","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-Comp2 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (550,470)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t152","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-Comp3 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (550,375)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t153","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM1 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (1000,1)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 5"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t154","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM2 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t155","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM3 using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t156","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM-Disc using the $m(\\tilde{t}_{1},\\tilde{\\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets...","name":"Cutflow 8"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t157","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM1 using the $m(\\mathrm{LQ}_{21}^\\mathrm{u}) = 600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\\nu$, as...","name":"Cutflow 9"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t158","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM2 using the $m(\\mathrm{LQ}_{21}^\\mathrm{u}) = 600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\\nu$, as...","name":"Cutflow 10"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t159","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM3 using the $m(\\mathrm{LQ}_{21}^\\mathrm{u}) = 600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\\nu$, as...","name":"Cutflow 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155678.v1/t160","@type":"Dataset","description":"Cutflow table for SR-HM-Disc using the $m(\\mathrm{LQ}_{21}^\\mathrm{u}) = 600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\\nu$, as...","name":"Cutflow 12"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2842361?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/155678"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse momentum and charm-tagged jets using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2842361?version=1","version":1}