{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/2872775"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2025)074","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CMS Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2025","description":"A search for a heavy $CP$-odd Higgs boson, $\\mathrm{A}$, decaying into a 125 GeV Higgsboson $\\mathrm{h}$ and a $\\mathrm{Z}$ boson is presented. The $\\mathrm{h}$ boson is identified via its decay into a pair of tau leptons, while the $\\mathrm{Z}$ boson is identified via its decay to a pair of electrons or muons. The search targets production of the $\\mathrm{A}$ boson via the gluon-gluon fusion process, $\\mathrm{gg\\rightarrow A}$, and also in association with bottom quarks, $\\mathrm{b\\bar{b}A}$. The analysis uses a data sample collected at the CERN  LHC with the CMS detector at a proton-proton centre-of-mass energy of $\\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 $\\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$. Constraints are set on the product of the branching fraction for the $\\mathrm{A}\\rightarrow\\mathrm{Zh}$ decay and the cross sections of the $\\mathrm{A}$ production mechanisms. The observed (expected) upper limit at 95\\% confidence level ranges from 0.049 (0.060) pb to 1.02 (0.79) pb for the $\\mathrm{gg\\rightarrow A}$ process and from 0.053 (0.059) pb to 0.79 (0.61) pb for the $\\mathrm{b\\bar{b}A}$ process in the probed range of the $\\mathrm{A}$ boson mass, $m_{\\mathrm{A}}$, from 225 GeV to 1 TeV. The results of the search are used to constrain parameters within the ${\\text{M}_{\\text{h,EFT}}^{\\text{125}}}$ benchmark scenario of the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model. Values of $\\tan\\beta$ below 2.2 are excluded in this scenario at 95\\% confidence level for all $m_{\\mathrm{A}}$ values in the range from 225 to 350 GeV.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"Exclusion limits on ggA production.","name":"Figure 4a"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"Exclusion limits on ggA production.","name":"Figure 4b"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-a.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-a.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-a.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-a.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-a.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-b.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-b.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-b.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-b.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-b.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-c.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-c.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-c.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-c.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-c.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-d.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-d.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-d.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-d.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig5-d.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-a.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-a.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-a.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-a.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-a.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-b.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-b.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-b.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-b.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-b.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-c.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-c.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-c.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-c.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-c.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-d.txt_95% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-d.txt_68% expected"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-d.txt_95% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-d.txt_68% observed"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"Example description","name":"Fig6-d.txt_Best fit"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.155628.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Lower limits on tab$?eta$ as a function of m(A) in the mhEFT(125) scenario. Values below the black solid line are...","name":"Figure 7"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2872775?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/155628"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Search for a heavy pseudoscalar Higgs boson decaying to a 125 GeV Higgs boson and a Z boson in final states with two tau and two light leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins2872775?version=1","version":1}