{"@context":"http://schema.org","@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1","@reverse":{"isBasedOn":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"URL","value":"https://inspirehep.net/literature/664843"}},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044906","@type":"JournalArticle"}]},"@type":"Dataset","additionalType":"Collection","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"STAR Collaboration"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"STAR Collaboration"},"datePublished":"2020","description":"We present a systematic analysis of two-pion interferometry in Au+Au collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV using the STAR detector at RHIC. We extract the HBT radii and study their multiplicity, transverse momentum, and azimuthal angle dependence. The Gaussianess of the correlation function is studied. Estimates of the geometrical and dynamical structure of the freeze-out source are extracted by fits with blast wave parameterizations. The expansion of the source and its relation with the initial energy density distribution is studied.","hasPart":[{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t1","@type":"Dataset","description":"1D correlation function for different values of SL (antisplitting cut).","name":"Table for Figure 2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t2","@type":"Dataset","description":"1D correlation functions for differeny values of the maximum fraction of merged hits allowed.","name":"Table for Figure 3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t3","@type":"Dataset","description":"Projections of the 3 dimensional correlation function and corresponding fits for negative pions from the 0-5% most central events and...","name":"Table for Figure 4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t4","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the three possible fitting procedures to the correlation functions described in this paper depending on how Coulomb...","name":"Table for Figure 5.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t5","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the three possible fitting procedures to the correlation functions described in this paper depending on how Coulomb...","name":"Table for Figure 5.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t6","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the three possible fitting procedures to the correlation functions described in this paper depending on how Coulomb...","name":"Table for Figure 5.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t7","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the three possible fitting procedures to the correlation functions described in this paper depending on how Coulomb...","name":"Table for Figure 5.4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t8","@type":"Dataset","description":"1D correlation function for pi+pi- compared to standard, Bowler-Sinyukov, and a thoretical calculation that includes Coulomb and strong interactions.","name":"Table for Figure 6"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t9","@type":"Dataset","description":"Momentum resolution for pions at midrapidity expressed by the widths dp_T/p_T, dphi and dtheta as a function of p.","name":"Table for Figure 7"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t10","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, without and with the reaction plane resolution applied, for two different...","name":"Table for Figure 8.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t11","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, without and with the reaction plane resolution applied, for two different...","name":"Table for Figure 8.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t12","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, without and with the reaction plane resolution applied, for two different...","name":"Table for Figure 8.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t13","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, without and with the reaction plane resolution applied, for two different...","name":"Table for Figure 8.4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t14","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, for the case where the lambda parameter is averaged and fixed...","name":"Table for Figure 9.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t15","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, for the case where the lambda parameter is averaged and fixed...","name":"Table for Figure 9.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t16","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, for the case where the lambda parameter is averaged and fixed...","name":"Table for Figure 9.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t17","@type":"Dataset","description":"Squared HBT radii relative to the reaction plane angle, for the case where the lambda parameter is averaged and fixed...","name":"Table for Figure 9.4"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t18","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fourier coefficients as a function of the maximum fraction of merged hits for the 5% most central events and kT...","name":"Table for Figure 11"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t19","@type":"Dataset","description":"Projections of the 3 dimensional correlation function and fits to Eq. (10) and with the Edgeworth expansion to Eq. (17)...","name":"Table for Figure 12"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t20","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the 0-5% most central events for fits to Eq. (10) and to Eq. (17) with no expansion.","name":"Table for Figure 13.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t21","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the 0-5% most central events for fits to Eq. (10) and to Eq. (17) upto 4th order...","name":"Table for Figure 13.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t22","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the 0-5% most central events for fits to Eq. (10) and to Eq. (17) upto 6th order...","name":"Table for Figure 13.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t23","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters for the 0-5% most central events for pi+pi+ and pi-pi- correlation functions.","name":"Table for Figure 14"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t24","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters from STAR and PHENIX at the same beam energy for the 0-30% most central events.","name":"Table for Figure 15"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t25","@type":"Dataset","description":"Energy dependence of the pi- HBT parameters for central Au+Au, Pb+Pb, and Pb+Au collisions at midrapidity and k_T ~ 0.2...","name":"Table for Figure 16"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t26","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameters vs. m_T for 6 different centralities.","name":"Table for Figure 17"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t27","@type":"Dataset","description":"Fourier coefficients of azimuthal oscillations of HBT radii vs. numer of participating nucleons, for pi+ and pi- pairs separately (0.25...","name":"Table for Figure 18"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t28","@type":"Dataset","description":"Comparison between the HBT radii obtained from the azimuthally integrated (traditional) HBT analysis and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients from the...","name":"Table for Figure 19"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t29","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT radius parametres for 6 different centralities.","name":"Table for Figure 20"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t30","@type":"Dataset","description":"Extracted parameters R' and alpha, from the power-law fits to the HBT radius parameters.","name":"Table for Figure 21"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t31","@type":"Dataset","description":"Extracted freeze-out source radius extracted from a blast wave fit; source radius Rgeom from fits to Rside; and 2*Rside for...","name":"Table for Figure 22"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t32","@type":"Dataset","description":"HBT parameter Rside.","name":"Table for Figure 23"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t33","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinitial (top panel) and R/Rinitial (bottom panel) for the azimuthally integrated analysis for the azimuthally-sensitive case vs. number...","name":"Table for Figure 24.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t34","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinitial (top panel) and R/Rinitial (bottom panel) for in the x (in-plane) and y (out-of-plane) directions for the...","name":"Table for Figure 24.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t35","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinitial for the azimuthally integrated analysis for the azimuthally-sensitive case vs. (dN/dy)/Rinitial.","name":"Table for Figure 25.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t36","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinitial in the x (in-plane) direction for the azimuthally-sensitive case vs. (dN/dy)/Rinitial.","name":"Table for Figure 25.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t37","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinitial in the y (out-of-plane) direction for the azimuthally-sensitive case vs. (dN/dy)/Rinitial.","name":"Table for Figure 25.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t38","@type":"Dataset","description":"Longitudinal HBT radius Rl.","name":"Table for Figure 26"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t39","@type":"Dataset","description":"Evolution time tau vs. number of participants as extracted from a fit to Rl, lines in Fig. 26 (triangles), and...","name":"Table for Figure 27"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t40","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinital for the azimuthally integrated analysis and for the in-plane and out-of-plane directions vs. beta_T,max*tau.","name":"Table for Figure 28.1"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t41","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinital for the azimuthally integrated analysis and for the in-plane and out-of-plane directions vs. beta_T,max*tau.","name":"Table for Figure 28.2"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t42","@type":"Dataset","description":"R - Rinital for the azimuthally integrated analysis and for the in-plane and out-of-plane directions vs. beta_T,max*tau.","name":"Table for Figure 28.3"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t43","@type":"Dataset","description":"Emission duration time dTau vs. number of participants as extracted using a blast wave fit to HBT parameters and spectra.","name":"Table for Figure 29"},{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.93263.v1/t44","@type":"Dataset","description":"Final source eccentricity as calculated from the Fourier coefficients (2R_{s,2}^2/R_{s,0}^2) and from the final in-plane and out-of-plane radii vs. initial...","name":"Table for Figure 30"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecord","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins664843?version=1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"HEPDataRecordAlt","value":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/93263"}],"inLanguage":"en","name":"Pion interferometry in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV.","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"HEPData"},"url":"https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins664843?version=1","version":1}