The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}{}_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ in the VR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top-quark, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources.

The distributions of $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ corresponding to the SR selection criteria defined in the text. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top-quark, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources.

The distributions of $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ corresponding to the SR_\text{std} selection criteria defined in the text. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top-quark, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources.

The distributions of $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ corresponding to the SR_\text{tight} selection criteria defined in the text. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top-quark, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources.

The distributions of $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ corresponding to the SR_\text{tight}^\text{std} selection criteria defined in the text. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top-quark, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic sources.

The distribution of $\mathrm{\Delta }{\varphi }_{\mu -MET}^{\mathrm{signed}}$ with all other event selection criteria applied in the SR; the straight lines indicate the positions of the selection requirements. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of $\mathrm{\Delta }{\varphi }_{\mu -MET}^{\mathrm{signed}}$ with all other event selection criteria applied in the VR; the straight lines indicate the positions of the selection requirements. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ in the SR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $m_{\mu -\mathrm{had}}^{\mathrm{col}}$ in the VR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the SR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the VR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the muon removed from the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the SR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the muon removed from the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the VR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the leading jet in the SR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the leading jet in the VR. `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $\mathrm{\Delta }{R}_{\tau \tau }^{\mathrm{reco}}$ between the muon and the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the SR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the $\mathrm{\Delta }{R}_{\tau \tau }^{\mathrm{reco}}$ between the muon and the ${\tau }_{\mathrm{had}}^{\mu \mathrm{\setminus }}$ in the VR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the reconstructed $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ in the SR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

The distribution of the reconstructed $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ in the VR `$Z(\to \tau \tau )+\text{jets}$' represents the contributions from the signal process. `Diboson' indicates the contributions from $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$ processes. `Top' represents the predicted contributions from the $t\overline{t}$, single-top, and $tW$ processes. `Other' includes the contributions from the $Z(\to \ell \ell )$+jets, $W$+jets, and Higgs boson processes. The uncertainties shown include both statistical and systematic errors.

Invariant mass of the lepton pair plus jet system, for data, background (pre- and post-reweighting) and three $H\to Za$ signal hypotheses (for $a\to q\overline{q}/gg$ inclusively). Events are required to pass the complete event selection but not the classification NN requirement. The background normalization is set equal to that of the data for events passing the preselection and being in the $m_{\ell \ell j}$ 100-180 GeV region. The signal normalization assumes the SM Higgs boson inclusive production cross-section, $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$, and it is scaled up by a factor of 100. The error bars (hatched regions) represent the data (MC) sample's statistical uncertainty in the histograms and the ratio plots. Vertical arrows indicate data points that fall outside the displayed $y$-axis range.

Regression NN output variable, for data, reweighted background, and three $H\to Za$ signal hypotheses ($a\to q\overline{q}/gg$ inclusively). Events are required to pass the complete event selection, including a $120<m_{\ell \ell j}<140$ GeV requirement, but not the classification NN output variable requirement. The background normalization is set equal to that of the data for events passing the preselection and being in the $m_{\ell \ell j}$ 100-180 GeV region. The signal normalization assumes the SM Higgs boson inclusive production cross-section, $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$, and it is scaled up by a factor of 100. The error bars (hatched regions) represent the data (MC) sample's statistical uncertainty in the histograms and the ratio plots. Vertical arrows indicate data points that fall outside the displayed $y$-axis range.

Classification NN output variable, for data, reweighted background, and three $H\to Za$ signal hypotheses ($a\to q\overline{q}/gg$ inclusively). Events are required to pass the complete event selection, including a $120<m_{\ell \ell j}<140$ GeV requirement, but not the classification NN output variable requirement. The background normalization is set equal to that of the data for events passing the preselection and being in the $m_{\ell \ell j}$ 100-180 GeV region. The signal normalization assumes the SM Higgs boson inclusive production cross-section, $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$, and it is scaled up by a factor of 100. The error bars (hatched regions) represent the data (MC) sample's statistical uncertainty in the histograms and the ratio plots. Vertical arrows indicate data points that fall outside the displayed $y$-axis range.

Invariant mass of the lepton pair plus jet system for data, reweighted background, and various signal hypotheses. Events are required to pass the complete event selection (preselection and classification NN requirement). The pre-fit background distribution is shown along with three $H\to Za$ signal hypotheses coming from the pure MC sample ($a\to q\overline{q}/gg$ inclusively). The background normalization is set equal to that of the data for events passing the preselection and being in the region 100-180 GeV. The error bars represent the data sample's statistical uncertainty and the grey bands represent the full background model uncertainty before the fit (assuming all the uncertainties are uncorrelated). The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the pre-fit background prediction.

Invariant mass of the lepton pair plus jet system for data, reweighted background, and 2.0 GeV signal hypotheses. Events are required to pass the complete event selection (preselection and classification NN requirement). The background shape and normalization come from the fit to the data. The signal includes only $gg$ decays, its shape comes from the fit, and it is normalized to $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$. The error bars represent the data sample's statistical uncertainty and the grey bands represent the full background model uncertainty after the fit. The lower panel shows the per-bin signal significance, $(N_{\text{data}}-N_{\text{MC}})\text{/}\sqrt{{\sigma }_{\text{data}}^2+{\sigma }_{\text{MC}}^2}$. The post-fit background uncertainty is calculated from a fit under the background-only hypothesis. Vertical arrows indicate data points that fall outside the displayed $y$-axis range.

Observed 95$\mathrm{\%}$ CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$ for $\mathcal{B}(a\to gg)=100\mathrm{\%}$, and the expectation under the background-only hypothesis together with its $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ intervals. The weaker limits from the previous version of the analysis (PRL 125(2020) 221802) are also shown. Linear interpolation is used to set limits between the mass points for which MC signal samples were generated.

Observed 95$\mathrm{\%}$ confidence level upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(H\to Za)=100\mathrm{\%}$ for $\mathcal{B}(a\to q\overline{q})=100\mathrm{\%}$, and the expectation under the background-only hypothesis together with its $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ intervals. The weaker limits from the previous version of the analysis (PRL 125(2020) 221802) are also shown. Linear interpolation is used to set limits between the mass points for which MC signal samples were generated.

Breakdown of relative systematic uncertainties in the measured $t\overline{t}$ cross-section. The quoted uncertainties are obtained by repeating the fit with a group of nuisance parameters fixed to their fitted values and subtracting in quadrature the resulting total uncertainty from the uncertainty of the complete fit. However, the total uncertainty is not the quadratic sum of the grouped impacts, as this approach neglects the correlation among the different groups.

The figure shows the measurement of the top quark pair production cross-section, ${\sigma }_{t\overline{t}}$, in lead-lead (Pb+Pb) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$ TeV, based on 1.9 nb${}^{-1}$ of data.

Product of acceptance and efficiency for pp->tbH(->Wh) as function of the charged Higgs boson mass for the resolved qqbb signal region.

Product of acceptance and efficiency for pp->tbH(->Wh) as function of the charged Higgs boson mass for the resolved lvbb signal region.

Product of acceptance and efficiency for pp->tbH(->Wh) as function of the charged Higgs boson mass for the merged lvbb signal region

Product of acceptance and efficiency for pp->tbH(->Wh) as function of the charged Higgs boson mass for the merged qqbb signal region

Distributions of the mWh observable in the low-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 5jex3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the low-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 5jex4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the low-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 6jin3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the low-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 6jin4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the high-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 5jex3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the high-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 5jex4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the high-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 6jin3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the high-purity signal regions of the resolved qqbb 6jin4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the signal regions of the resolved lvbb 5jex3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the signal regions of the resolved lvbb 5jex4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the signal regions of the resolved lvbb 6jin3bex event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

Distributions of the mWh observable in the signal regions of the resolved lvbb 6jin4bin event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The distributions are presented after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contribution assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 700 GeV, normalised to the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) of 0.064 pb, is shown as a dashed histogram.

The mWh distributions in the Low-NN-score SRs of the merged qqbb 0b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the Low-NN-score SRs of the merged qqbb 1b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the High-NN-score SRs of the merged qqbb 0b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the High-NN-score SRs of the merged qqbb 1b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the Low-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 0b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the Low-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 1b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the Medium-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 0b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the Medium-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 1b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the High-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 0b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

The mWh distributions in the High-NN-score SRs of the merged lvbb 1b event categories. The term ‘Others’ summarises events from tHjb, tWh, tttt, and SM Vh production. The background prediction is shown after a background-only maximum-likelihood fit to data. The individual background uncertainty does not take into account the possible correlations between the nuisance parameter. The expected signal contributions assuming $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 900 GeV and $m_{H^{\pm }}$ = 2000 GeV, normalised the expected limit of the cross-section times branching ratio (${\sigma }_{sig}$ × B) values of 0.036 pb and 2.7 fb respectively, are shown as dashed histograms.

Cutflow table for a few selected signal samples after applying the selection requirements of the resolved analysis. At the initial cut stage, all events from the tbH ± → W ± h(→ b b) production process (including those from the fully hadronic decay channel) are considered.

Cutflow table for a few selected signal samples after applying the selection requirements of the merged analysis. At the initial cut stage, all events from the tbH ± → W ± h(→ bb) production process (including those from the fully hadronic decay channel) are considered.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM1.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM2.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-HM3.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp1.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp2.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp3.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp-1c.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos when only considering SR-Comp-1c.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 1 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to top or charm quarks and 200 GeV neutralinos for different branching fraction assumptions.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Expected exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Observed exclusion limit $(+1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Observed exclusion limit $(-1\sigma )$ at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Observed upper limit on the cross-section at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying into charm quarks and neutralinos for the fit with the best expected CL${}_{\mathrm{S}}$.

Observed upper limit on the cross-section for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to first generation leptons and second generation quarks.

Observed upper limit on the cross-section for pair production of up-type scalar LQs coupled to second generation leptons and quarks.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(-1\sigma )$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(+1\sigma )$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Observed upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the minimal coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(-1\sigma )$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section $(+1\sigma )$ for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Expected upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Observed upper limit on the cross-section for $U(1)$ vector LQ models in the Yang-Mills coupling scenario with ${\beta }_{23}=1$, corresponding to a branching fraction $\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}\to c\nu )=0.5$.

Distribution of $R_{\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp-1c showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(450,430)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Distribution of $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}\mathrm{Sig}.$ in SR-HM1 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(1000,1)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Distribution of $m_{\mathrm{T}}^{\min }(c)$ in SR-HM2 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(750,450)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Distribution of $R_{\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp1 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(600,550)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Distribution of $R_{\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp2 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(550,470)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Distribution of $R_{\mathrm{ISR}}$ in SR-Comp3 showing the data and the expected backgrounds, after simultaneously fitting all the control regions. The pre-fit yields for a representative $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(550,375)$ GeV signal is included. Processes with top quarks and multiple vector bosons are included in "Other". The right-most bin does not include the overflow entry but the $x$-axis range is chosen to include all observed data.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp-1c.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp1.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp2.

Acceptance across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp3.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM1.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM2.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM3.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM1.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM2.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM3.

Acceptance for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM1. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM2. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM3. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM1. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM2. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM3. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc. Due to the limited statistical power of the signal samples, efficiencies can fluctuate and can drop to zero.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp-1c.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp1.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp2.

Acceptance times efficiency across the SUSY signal grid for SR-Comp3.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM1.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM2.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM3.

Acceptance times efficiency across the ${\mathrm{LQ}}_{22}^{\mathrm{u}}$ signal grid for SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM1.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM2.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM3.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\min }$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM1.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM2.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM3.

Acceptance times efficiency for the ${\mathrm{vLQ}}_{23}^{\mathrm{u},\mathrm{YM}}$ signal model in SR-HM-Disc.

Cutflow table for SR-Comp-1c using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(450,430)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-Comp1 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(600,550)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-Comp2 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(550,470)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-Comp3 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(550,375)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM1 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(1000,1)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM2 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM3 using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM-Disc using the $m({\tilde{t}}_1,{\tilde{\chi }}_1^0)=(750,450)$ GeV signal point as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM1 using the $m({\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}})=600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\nu$, as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.

Cutflow table for SR-HM2 using the $m({\mathrm{LQ}}_{21}^{\mathrm{u}})=600$ GeV signal point, with a 50% branching fraction to $c\nu$, as the benchmark. All jet-related variables use jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>40$ GeV, however, the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is calculated with jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}>20$ GeV. The "Preselection" requirement includes: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}>250$ GeV; events containing electrons or muons are vetoed; at least two jets must be present of which at least one must be identified as a $c$-tagged jet; events with jets that have been identified as $b$-tagged are discarded; the minimum azimuthal angular ($\varphi$) distance between the (up to) four leading jets and the ${\overrightarrow{p}}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ is required to be greater than 0.4.