Showing 10 of 24 results
The anisotropy of the azimuthal distributions of charged particles produced in PbPb collisions with a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 2.76 TeV is studied with the CMS experiment at the LHC. The elliptic anisotropy parameter defined as the second coefficient in a Fourier expansion of the particle invariant yields, is extracted using the event-plane method, two- and four-particle cumulants, and Lee--Yang zeros. The anisotropy is presented as a function of transverse momentum (pt), pseudorapidity (eta) over a broad kinematic range: 0.3 < pt < 20 GeV, abs(eta) < 2.4, and in 12 classes of collision centrality from 0 to 80%. The results are compared to those obtained at lower center-of-mass energies, and various scaling behaviors are examined. When scaled by the geometric eccentricity of the collision zone, the elliptic anisotropy is found to obey a universal scaling with the transverse particle density for different collision systems and center-of-mass energies.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 0-5%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 5-10%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 10-15%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 15-20%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 20-25%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 25-30%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 30-35%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 35-40%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 40-50%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 50-60%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 60-70%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 70-80%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 0-5%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 5-10%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 10-15%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 15-20%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 20-25%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 25-30%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 30-35%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 35-40%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 40-50%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 50-60%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 60-70%.
Measurements of the second-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C2) v PT for the centrality range 70-80%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 5-10%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 10-15%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 15-20%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 20-25%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 25-30%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 30-35%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 35-40%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 40-50%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 50-60%.
Measurements of the fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameter using the cumulant method, V2(C4) v PT for the centrality range 60-70%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 5-10%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 10-15%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 15-20%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 20-25%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 25-30%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 30-35%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 35-40%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the Lee-Yang zeros method, V2(LYZ) v PT for the centrality range 40-50%.
Integrtated V2 as a function of centrality.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 0-5%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 5-10%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 10-15%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 15-20%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 20-25%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 25-30%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 30-35%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 35-40%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 40-50%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 50-60%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 60-70%.
Pseudorapidity dependence of V2 for centrality 70-80%.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 0-5% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 0-5% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 5-10% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 5-10% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 10-15% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 10-15% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 15-20% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 15-20% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 20-25% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 20-25% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 25-30% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 25-30% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 30-35% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 30-35% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 35-40% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 35-40% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 40-50% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 40-50% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 50-60% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 50-60% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 60-70% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 60-70% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 70-80% and |eta| ranges 0.0-0.4, 0.4-0.8 and 0.8-1.2.
PT dependence of V2(EP) for centrality 70-80% and |eta| ranges 1.2-1.6, 1.6-2.0 and 2.0-2.4.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 0-10%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 10-20%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 20-30%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 30-40%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 40-50%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 50-60%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 60-70%.
Measurements of the elliptic anisotropy parameter using the event-plane method, V2(EP) v PT for the centrality range 70-80%.
Measurements of the second- and fourth-order elliptic anisotropy parameters using the cumulant method v PT for the centrality range 20-60%.
Integrated V2 value extrapolated to PT=0 for the 20-30% centrality range using the event-plane method. Error is combined statistical and systematic.
Integrated V2 values from the event-plane method divided by the participant eccentricity (EPSILON) as a function of the number of participating nucleons (NPART) for the |eta| range <0.8 and PT range 0-3 GeV. Also shown are the correspnding centrality bin ranges.
Eccentricity-scaled V2 as a function of the transverse charged-particle density normalised by the transverse overlap area (S).
The dependence of V2 from the event-plane method on the pseudorapidity, transformed to the rest frame of nuclei moving separately in the positive(negative) directions by adding(subtracting) the beam rapidity,YBEAM. +(-)ve values are from +(-)YBEAM.
Differential measurements of charged particle azimuthal anisotropy are presented for lead-lead collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 8 mb^-1. This anisotropy is characterized via a Fourier expansion of the distribution of charged particles in azimuthal angle (phi), with the coefficients v_n denoting the magnitude of the anisotropy. Significant v_2-v_6 values are obtained as a function of transverse momentum (0.5<pT<20 GeV), pseudorapidity (|eta|<2.5) and centrality using an event plane method. The v_n values for n>=3 are found to vary weakly with both eta and centrality, and their pT dependencies are found to follow an approximate scaling relation, v_n^{1/n}(pT) \propto v_2^{1/2}(pT). A Fourier analysis of the charged particle pair distribution in relative azimuthal angle (Dphi=phi_a-phi_b) is performed to extract the coefficients v_{n,n}=<cos (n Dphi)>. For pairs of charged particles with a large pseudorapidity gap (|Deta=eta_a-eta_b|>2) and one particle with pT<3 GeV, the v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} values are found to factorize as v_{n,n}(pT^a,pT^b) ~ v_n(pT^a)v_n(pT^b) in central and mid-central events. Such factorization suggests that these values of v_{2,2}-v_{6,6} are primarily due to the response of the created matter to the fluctuations in the geometry of the initial state. A detailed study shows that the v_{1,1}(pT^a,pT^b) data are consistent with the combined contributions from a rapidity-even v_1 and global momentum conservation. A two-component fit is used to extract the v_1 contribution. The extracted v_1 is observed to cross zero at pT\sim1.0 GeV, reaches a maximum at 4-5 GeV with a value comparable to that for v_3, and decreases at higher pT.
The EP Resolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from2 to 6.
The Chi Reolution Factor vs. Centrality for n values from 2 to 6.
The one-dimensional Delta(PHI) correlation function vs Delta(PHI) for |DETARAP| in the range 2 to 5 summed over all n values from 1 to 6.
The Fourier coefficient V_n,n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| for individual n values.
The Fourier coefficient V_n vs. |Delta(ETARAP)| from the 2PC anaysis for individual n values from 2 to n.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 0.5 TO 1 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 1 TO 2 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 2 TO 3 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 3 TO 4 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 0 TO 5%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 5 TO 10%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 10 TO 20%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 20 TO 30%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 30 TO 40%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 40 TO 50%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 50 TO 60%.
The Fourier coefiiciant V_n vs eta for PT 4 TO 8 GeV and centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 0 TO 5%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 5 TO 10%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 10 TO 20%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 20 TO 30%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 30 TO 40%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 40 TO 50%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 50 TO 60%.
V_n vs PT for centrality 60 TO 70%.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 1 TO 2 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 2 TO 3 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 3 TO 4 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 4 TO 8 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 8 TO 12 GeV.
V_n vs Centrality for PT 12 TO 20 GeV.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
2PC.V_n vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 1 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 5 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 5 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 0 TO 10 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 10 TO 20 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 20 TO 30 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 30 TO 40 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 40 TO 50 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 50 TO 60 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 60 TO 70 %.
V_nn vs n for Centrality 70 TO 80 %.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
correlation funcitons in various pT bins.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1,1} vs eta for different combinations of pTa and pTb. Figure 18.
v_{1} vs pT for different centrality selections, Figure 21.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_n extracted from 2PC method utilizing the factorization relation.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
v_ vs pta for various centrality pta combinations.
The integrated elliptic flow of charged particles produced in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV has been measured with the ATLAS detector using data collected at the Large Hadron Collider. The anisotropy parameter, v_2, was measured in the pseudorapidity range |eta| <= 2.5 with the event-plane method. In order to include tracks with very low transverse momentum pT, thus reducing the uncertainty in v_2 integrated over pT, a 1 mu b-1 data sample without a magnetic field in the tracking detectors is used. The centrality dependence of the integrated v_2 is compared to other measurements obtained with higher pT thresholds. A weak pseudorapidity dependence of the integrated elliptic flow is observed for central collisions, and a small decrease when moving away from mid-rapidity is observed only in peripheral collisions. The integrated v2 transformed to the rest frame of one of the colliding nuclei is compared to the lower-energy RHIC data.
Monte Carlo evaluation of the tracklet reconstruction efficiency as a function of pseudorapidity for the 0-10% centraliry interval.
Monte Carlo evaluation of the tracklet reconstruction efficiency as a function of pseudorapidity for the 40-50% centraliry interval.
Monte Carlo evaluation of the tracklet reconstruction efficiency as a function of pseudorapidity for the 70-80% centraliry interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 70-80% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the pixel track (PXT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 70-80% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction efficiency for three pseudorapidity ranges in 70-80% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the inner detector track (IDT) reconstruction fake rate for three pseudorapidity ranges in 70-80% centrality interval.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 0-10% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 10-20% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 20-30% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 30-40% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 40-50% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 50-60% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 60-70% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Elliptic flow $v_{2}$ integrated over transverse momentum $p_{T}>p_{T,0}$ as a function of $p_{T,0}$ for 70-80% centrality interval, obtained with different charged-particle reconstruction methods: the tracklet (TKT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.07$ GeV, the pixel track (PXT) method with $p_{T,0} \geq 0.1$ GeV and the ID track (IDT) method with $p_{T,0}=0.5$ GeV. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 0-10% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 10-20% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 20-30% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 30-40% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 40-50% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 50-60% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 60-70% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Pseudorapidity dependence of elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, integrated over transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for different charged particle reconstruction methods and different low-$p_{T}$ thresholds for the 70-80% centrality interval. Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
Integrated elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of $|\eta| - y_{beam}$ for three centrality intervals Error bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the TKT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the TKT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the TKT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 70-80% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the PXT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 0-10% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the PXT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 40-50% centrality interval.
The transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, dependence of the PXT track reconstruction efficiency for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$ and $p^{\pm}$ in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta| < 1$ for 70-80% centrality interval.
The Fourier coefficients v[2] and v[3] characterizing the anisotropy of the azimuthal distribution of charged particles produced in PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV are measured with data collected by the CMS experiment. The measurements cover a broad transverse momentum range, 1 < pT < 100 GeV. The analysis focuses on pT > 10 GeV range, where anisotropic azimuthal distributions should reflect the path-length dependence of parton energy loss in the created medium. Results are presented in several bins of PbPb collision centrality, spanning the 60% most central events. The v[2] coefficient is measured with the scalar product and the multiparticle cumulant methods, which have different sensitivities to the initial-state fluctuations. The values of both methods remain positive up to pT of about 60-80 GeV, in all examined centrality classes. The v[3] coefficient, only measured with the scalar product method, tends to zero for pT greater than or equal to 20 GeV. Comparisons between theoretical calculations and data provide new constraints on the path-length dependence of parton energy loss in heavy ion collisions and highlight the importance of the initial-state fluctuations.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-5\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-5\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{3}$ result from SP method as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 5-10\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-20\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 20-30\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 30-40\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 40-50\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}$ result from 4-, 6- and 8-particle cumulant methods as a function of $p_{T}$ in 50-60\% centrality bin of PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Shaded boxes represent systematic uncertainties.
The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from SP method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
The $v_{2}^{high}$ as a function of $v_{2}^{low}$ results from 4-particle cumulant method in PbPb collisions at $sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Modifications of the properties of jets in PbPb collisions, relative to those in pp collisions, are studied at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV via correlations of charged particles with the jet axis in relative pseudorapidity ($\Delta \eta$), relative azimuth ($\Delta \phi$), and relative angular distance from the jet axis $\Delta \mathrm{r} = \sqrt{{(\Delta\eta)^{2}+(\Delta\phi)^{2}}}$. This analysis uses data collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 404 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ and 27.4 pb$^{-1}$ for PbPb and pp collisions, respectively. Charged particle number densities, jet fragmentation functions, and jet shapes are presented as a function of PbPb collision centrality and charged-particle track transverse momentum, providing a differential description of jet modifications due to interactions with the quark-gluon plasma.
The distribution of jet-correlated charged-particle tracks with $|{\Delta\phi}|<1.0$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The difference between the PbPb and pp measurements from Table 1.
The distribution of jet-correlated charged-particle tracks with $|{\Delta\eta}|<1.0$ as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The difference between the PbPb and pp measurements from Table 3.
The distribution of jet-correlated charged-particle tracks as a function of $\Delta\mathrm{r}$ in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The difference between the PbPb and pp measurements from Table 5.
The distribution of jet-correlated charged-particle tracks with $\Delta\mathrm{r} <1$ as a function of ${p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{trk}}}$ in PbPb and pp collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The corresponding results for the difference between the PbPb and pp measurements from Table 7.
The radial jet momentum distribution $\mathrm{P}(\Delta\mathrm{r})$ of jets in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The ratio between PbPb and pp measurements from Table 9 for the indicated intervals of ${p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{trk}}}$.
The jet shape $\rho(\Delta\mathrm{r})$ in pp and PbPb collisions. The PbPb results are shown for different centrality regions.
The ratio between the PbPb and pp measurements from Table 11 for the inclusive range $0.7< {p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{trk}}} <300GeV$.
A systematic study of the factorization of long-range azimuthal two-particle correlations into a product of single-particle anisotropies is presented as a function of pt and eta of both particles, and as a function of the particle multiplicity in PbPb and pPb collisions. The data were taken with the CMS detector for PbPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV and pPb collisions at sqrt(s[NN]) = 5.02 TeV, covering a very wide range of multiplicity. Factorization is observed to be broken as a function of both particle pt and eta. When measured with particles of different pt, the magnitude of the factorization breakdown for the second Fourier harmonic reaches 20% for very central PbPb collisions but decreases rapidly as the multiplicity decreases. The data are consistent with viscous hydrodynamic predictions, which suggest that the effect of factorization breaking is mainly sensitive to the initial-state conditions rather than to the transport properties (e.g., shear viscosity) of the medium. The factorization breakdown is also computed with particles of different eta. The effect is found to be weakest for mid-central PbPb events but becomes larger for more central or peripheral PbPb collisions, and also for very high-multiplicity pPb collisions. The eta-dependent factorization data provide new insights to the longitudinal evolution of the medium formed in heavy ion collisions.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ for $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c for centrality 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $220<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $150<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $120<=N^{offline}_{trk}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $100<=N^{offline}_{trk}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.0<p^{trig}_{T}<1.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $1.5<p^{trig}_{T}<2.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.0<p^{trig}_{T}<2.5$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $p_{T}$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $p^{a}_{T} - p^{b}_{T}$ with $2.5<p^{trig}_{T}<3.0$ GeV/c and multiplicity bin $185<=N^{offline}_{trk}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{2}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-5% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 5-10% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 10-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-30% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 30-40% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 40-50% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{3}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 50-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta_b$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-0.2% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 0-20% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The $\eta$-dependent factorization ratio, $r_{4}$, as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta_b$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for centrality class 20-60% in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $120<=N_{trk}^{offline}<150$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $150<=N_{trk}^{offline}<185$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $185<=N_{trk}^{offline}<220$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^{a}, \eta^{b}){\cdot(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 3.0<$\eta^{b}$<4.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for multiplicity bin $220<=N_{trk}^{offline}<260$ in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
The square root of the product of factorization ratios $\sqrt{r_2(\eta^a, \eta^b)\cdot{r_2(-\eta^{a}, -\eta^{b})}}$ as a function of $\eta^{a}$ for 4.4<$\eta^{b}$<5.0 averaged over 0.3<$p^{a}_{T}$<3 GeV for a given multiplicity class in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_2$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_3$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_4$ as a function of event multiplicity in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.
$F^{\eta}_2$ as a function of event multiplicity in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
ATLAS measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV are shown using a dataset of approximately 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ collected at the LHC in 2010. The measurements are performed for charged particles with transverse momenta $0.5<p_T<20$ GeV and in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.5$. The anisotropy is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_n$, of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distribution for n = 2-4. The Fourier coefficients are evaluated using multi-particle cumulants calculated with the generating function method. Results on the transverse momentum, pseudorapidity and centrality dependence of the $v_n$ coefficients are presented. The elliptic flow, $v_2$, is obtained from the two-, four-, six- and eight-particle cumulants while higher-order coefficients, $v_3$ and $v_4$, are determined with two- and four-particle cumulants. Flow harmonics $v_n$ measured with four-particle cumulants are significantly reduced compared to the measurement involving two-particle cumulants. A comparison to $v_n$ measurements obtained using different analysis methods and previously reported by the LHC experiments is also shown. Results of measurements of flow fluctuations evaluated with multi-particle cumulants are shown as a function of transverse momentum and the collision centrality. Models of the initial spatial geometry and its fluctuations fail to describe the flow fluctuations measurements.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-2%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the six-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the eight-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-80%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the four-particle cumulats as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%.
The second flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-2%.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulats as a function of pseudorapidity in centrality bin 0-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v2), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v3), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v4), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic measured with the two-particle cumulants as a function of <Npart>.
The quadrangular flow harmonic measured with the Event Plane method as a function of <Npart>.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{EP} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 2-5%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 15-20%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 25-30%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 35-40%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 45-50%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%.
The second flow harmonic fluctiuations, F(v2), calculated from v2{2} and v2{4}, as a function of transverse momentum in centrality bin 55-60%.
The second flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v2), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v3), as a function of <Npart>.
The triangular flow harmonic fluctuations, F(v4), as a function of <Npart>.
Measurements of two-particle angular correlations between an identified strange hadron (K0S or Lambda/anti-Lambda) and a charged particle, emitted in pPb collisions, are presented over a wide range in pseudorapidity and full azimuth. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of approximately 35 inverse nanobarns, were collected at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy (sqrt(s[NN])) of 5.02 TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC. The results are compared to semi-peripheral PbPb collision data at sqrt(s[NN]) = 2.76 TeV, covering similar charged-particle multiplicities in the events. The observed azimuthal correlations at large relative pseudorapidity are used to extract the second-order (v[2]) and third-order (v[3]) anisotropy harmonics of K0S and Lambda/anti-Lambda particles. These quantities are studied as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity in the event and the transverse momentum of the particles. For high-multiplicity pPb events, a clear particle species dependence of v[2] and v[3] is observed. For pt < 2 GeV, the v[2] and v[3] values of K0S particles are larger than those of Lambda/anti-Lambda particles at the same pt. This splitting effect between two particle species is found to be stronger in pPb than in PbPb collisions in the same multiplicity range. When divided by the number of constituent quarks and compared at the same transverse kinetic energy per quark, both v[2] and v[3] for K0S particles are observed to be consistent with those for Lambda/anti-Lambda particles at the 10% level in pPb collisions. This consistency extends over a wide range of particle transverse kinetic energy and event multiplicities.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.
The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.
The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.
The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.
Correlations between the elliptic or triangular flow coefficients $v_m$ ($m$=2 or 3) and other flow harmonics $v_n$ ($n$=2 to 5) are measured using $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2010 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated lumonisity of 7 $\mu$b$^{-1}$. The $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations are measured in midrapidity as a function of centrality, and, for events within the same centrality interval, as a function of event ellipticity or triangularity defined in a forward rapidity region. For events within the same centrality interval, $v_3$ is found to be anticorrelated with $v_2$ and this anticorrelation is consistent with similar anticorrelations between the corresponding eccentricities $\epsilon_2$ and $\epsilon_3$. On the other hand, it is observed that $v_4$ increases strongly with $v_2$, and $v_5$ increases strongly with both $v_2$ and $v_3$. The trend and strength of the $v_m$-$v_n$ correlations for $n$=4 and 5 are found to disagree with $\epsilon_m$-$\epsilon_n$ correlations predicted by initial-geometry models. Instead, these correlations are found to be consistent with the combined effects of a linear contribution to $v_n$ and a nonlinear term that is a function of $v_2^2$ or of $v_2v_3$, as predicted by hydrodynamic models. A simple two-component fit is used to separate these two contributions. The extracted linear and nonlinear contributions to $v_4$ and $v_5$ are found to be consistent with previously measured event-plane correlations.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_2$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-5%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 5-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-15%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 15-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-25%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 25-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-35%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 35-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-45%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 45-50%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 50-55%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 55-60%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 60-65%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 65-70%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 0-10%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 10-20%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 20-30%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 30-40%.
$v_{2}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{3}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{4}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{5}$ data for various $q_3$ bins, Centrality 40-50%.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
linear fit result of $v_{2}$ - $v_{3}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{2}$ correlation for various q3 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{4}$ correlation within each centrality.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_4$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_5$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q2 event-shape selection.
$v_5$ decomposed into linear and nonlinear contributions based on q3 event-shape selection.
RMS eccentricity scaled v_n.
RMS eccentricity scaled v_n.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{5}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{2}$ - $v_{5}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{5}$ inclusive correlation in 5% centrality intervals.
$v_{3}$ - $v_{5}$ correlation for various q2 bins within each centrality.
Charged-particle spectra obtained in 0.15 nb${}^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb interactions at $\sqrt{{s}_\mathsf{{NN}}}=2.76$TeV and 4.2 pb${}^{-1}$ of pp interactions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC are presented in a wide transverse momentum ($0.5 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 150$ GeV) and pseudorapidity ($|\eta|<2$) range. For Pb+Pb collisions, the spectra are presented as a function of collision centrality, which is determined by the response of the forward calorimeter located on both sides of the interaction point. The nuclear modification factors $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{CP}}$ are presented in detail as function of centrality, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and $\eta$. They show a distinct $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-dependence with a pronounced minimum at about 7 GeV. Above 60 GeV, $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ is consistent with a plateau at a centrality-dependent value, within the uncertainties. The value is $0.55\pm0.01(stat.)\pm0.04(syst.)$ in the most central collisions. The $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ distribution is consistent with flat $|\eta|$ dependence over the whole transverse momentum range in all centrality classes.
Raa as a function of <Npart>.
Raa as a function of <Npart>.
Raa as a function of <Npart>.
Raa as a function of <Npart>.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb (not shown in Fig. 17).
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).
Raa in different eta intervals.
Raa in different eta intervals.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.