Evans, David
ALEPH
Transverse Momentum Dependence
[10.0, 100.0]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

rivet Analysis
Studies of QCD at e+ e- centre-of-mass energies between 91-GeV and 209-GeV.

The ALEPH collaboration Heister, A. ; Schael, S. ; Barate, R. ; et al.
Eur.Phys.J.C 35 (2004) 457-486, 2004.
Inspire Record 636645 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.12794

The hadronic final states observed with the ALEPH detector at LEP in ${\rm e}^ + {\rm e}^-$ annihilation

234 data tables
Table 1

Mean charged particle multiplicities at different c.m. energies.

Table 2

XP distribution at c.m. energy 133.0 GeV.

Table 3

XP distribution at c.m. energy 161.0 GeV.

More…

Production of K0 and Lambda in hadronic Z decays

The ALEPH collaboration Buskulic, D. ; Casper, D. ; De Bonis, I. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 64 (1994) 361-374, 1994.
Inspire Record 375060 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.48239

Measurements of the inclusive cross-sections forK0 and Λ production in hadronic decays of the Z are presented together with measurements of two-particle correlations within pairs of Λ andK0. The results are compared with predictions from the hadronization models Jetset, based on string fragmentation, and Herwig, based on cluster decays. TheK0 spectrum is found to be harder than predicted by both models, while the Λ spectrum is softer than predicted. The correlation measurements are all reproduced well by Jetset, while Herwig misses some of the qualitative features and overestimates the size of the\(\Lambda \bar \Lambda \) correlation. Finally, the possibility of Bose-Einstein correlation in theKS0KS0 system is discussed.

7 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Properties of hadronic Z decays and test of QCD generators

The ALEPH collaboration Buskulic, D. ; Decamp, D. ; Goy, C. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 55 (1992) 209-234, 1992.
Inspire Record 334577 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.1420

Distributions are presented of event shape variables, jet roduction rates and charged particle momenta obtained from 53 000 hadronicZ decays. They are compared to the predictions of the QCD+hadronization models JETSET, ARIADNE and HERWIG, and are used to optimize several model parameters. The JETSET and ARIADNE coherent parton shower (PS) models with running αs and string fragmentation yield the best description of the data. The HERWIG parton shower model with cluster fragmentation fits the data less well. The data are in better agreement with JETSET PS than with JETSETO(αS2) matrix elements (ME) even when the renormalization scale is optimized.

41 data tables
Table 1

Sphericity distribution.

Table 2

Sphericity distribution.

Table 3

Aplanarity distribution.

More…