Karami, H.
PI- P --> PI- P
Cross Section
[10.0, 100.0]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

Diffraction Dissociation of Photons on Hydrogen

Chapin, T.J. ; Cool, R.L. ; Goulianos, Konstantin A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 31 (1985) 17-30, 1985.
Inspire Record 216071 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.4332

We report results from a measurement of the inclusive diffraction dissociation of photons on hydrogen, γp→Xp, in the range 75<pγ<148 GeV/c, 0.02<‖t‖<0.1 (GeV/c)2, and MX2/s<0.1. Our data show an exponential t dependence and a dominant 1/MX2 behavior for MX2>4 GeV2. We test the finite-mass sum rule and, by comparing γp with π−p data obtained in the same apparatus, we test factorization.

18 data tables match query
Table 1

EXTRACTED ELASTIC CROSS SECTIONS.

Table 2

EXTRACTED ELASTIC CROSS SECTIONS.

Table 3

RESULTS OF EXPONENTIAL FITS TO ELASTIC CROSS SECTIONS.

More…

Inelastic Two Prong Events in 147-GeV/c $\pi^- p$ Collisions.

Fong, D. ; Heller, M. ; Shapiro, A. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 104 (1976) 32-51, 1976.
Inspire Record 112609 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36026

None

1 data table match query
Table 1

No description provided.


Cross-Sections and Charged Multiplicity Distributions for $\pi^- p$ and $K^- p$ Interactions at 147 GeV/c.

Fong, D. ; Heller, M. ; Shapiro, A.M. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 102 (1976) 386-404, 1976.
Inspire Record 112604 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36057

The results presented in this paper were obtained from a 105 000 frame exposure of the FNAL Hybrid Proportional Wire Chamber-30 inch Bubble Chamber System, in a tagged beam of 147 GeV/ c negative particles. Elastic, total and topological cross sections were obtained for both π − p and K − p interactions. Comparisons with other data, taken with various beam particles over large momentum intervals, show good agreement with KNO scaling, and similarity in the scaling behavior of σ n for the different beam particles.

3 data tables match query
Table 1

THESE CROSS SECTIONS ARE NOT NORMALIZED TO ANY OTHER ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT. THE ERRORS INCLUDE SOME SYSTEMATIC ERRORS.

Table 2

THE FORWARD CROSS SECTION AGREES WELL WITH THE OPTICAL POINT FROM TOTAL CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS.

Table 3

THESE CROSS SECTIONS ARE NOT NORMALIZED TO ANY OTHER ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT.