Determination of the Charged Pion Form Factor at Q2=1.60 and 2.45 (GeV/c)2

The Jefferson Lab F(pi)-2 collaboration Horn, T. ; Aniol, K. ; Arrington, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 97 (2006) 192001, 2006.
Inspire Record 721062 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31560

The H(e,e'pi+)n cross section was measured at four-momentum transfers of Q2=1.60 and 2.45 GeV2 at an invariant mass of the photon nucleon system of W=2.22 GeV. The charged pion form factor (F_pi) was extracted from the data by comparing the separated longitudinal pion electroproduction cross section to a Regge model prediction in which F_pi is a free parameter. The results indicate that the pion form factor deviates from the charge-radius constrained monopole form at these values of Q2 by one sigma, but is still far from its perturbative Quantum Chromo-Dynamics prediction.

3 data tables

Separated cross sections at mean Q**2 of 1.60 GeV**2.

Separated cross sections at mean Q**2 of 2.45 GeV**2.

Extracted values of the charged pion form-factor. Errors are the statistical and experimental systematics combined in quadrature.


The Pion Electromagnetic Form-factor in the Timelike Energy Range 1.35-{GeV} $\le \sqrt{s} \le$ 2.4-{GeV}

The DM2 collaboration Bisello, D. ; Busetto, G. ; Castro, A. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 220 (1989) 321-327, 1989.
Inspire Record 267118 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29829

The e + e − → π + π − cross section has been measured from about 280 events (an order of magnitude more than the previous world statistics) in the energy interval 1.35 ⩽ s ⩽ 2.4 GeV with the DM2 detector at DCI. The pion squared form factor | F π | 2 shows a deep minimum around 1.6 GeV/ c 2 and is better fit under the hypothesis of two ϱ-like resonance ⋍0.25 GeV/ c 2 wide with 1.42 and 1.77 GeV/ c 2 masses.

1 data table

Statistical errors only.


A Measurement of the Space - Like Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor

The NA7 collaboration Amendolia, S.R. ; Arik, M. ; Badelek, B. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 277 (1986) 168, 1986.
Inspire Record 228132 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.33611

The pion form factor has been measured in the space-like q 2 region 0.014 to 0.26 (GeV/ c ) 2 by scattering 300 GeV pions from the electrons of a liquid hydrogen target. A detailed description is given of the apparatus, data analysis and corrections to the data. The mean square charge radius extracted from the data is model-dependent. We find that a form which includes a realistic description of the form factor phase gives a similar results to the naive pole form, and conclude 〈r 2 π 〉 = 0.438±0.008 fm 2 .

1 data table

No description provided.


A Measurement of the Pion Charge Radius

Amendolia, S.R. ; Badelek, B. ; Batignani, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 146 (1984) 116-120, 1984.
Inspire Record 201598 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30511

We report a measurement of the negative pion electromagnetic form factor in the range of space-like four-momentum transfer 0.014 < q 2 < 0.122 (GeV/ c ) 2 . The measurement was made by the NA7 collaboration at the CERN SPS, by observing the interaction of 300 GeV pions with the electrons of a liquid hydrogen target. The form factor is fitted by a pole form with a pion radius of 〈r 2 〈 1 2 = 0.657 ± 0.012 fm.

1 data table

Errors are statistical only.


Measurement of the Pion Form-factor in the Timelike Region for $q^2$ Values Between .1-{GeV}/$c^2$ and .18-{GeV}/$c^2$

Amendolia, S.R. ; Badelek, B. ; Batignani, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 138 (1984) 454-458, 1984.
Inspire Record 195944 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30572

The EM form factor of the pion has been studied in the time-like region by measuring σ (e + e − → π + π − ) normalized to σ (e + e − → μ + μ − ). Results have been obtained for q 2 down to the physical threshold.

1 data table

No description provided.


Measurements of the proton elastic form-factors for 1-GeV/c**2 <= Q**2 <= 3-GeV/C**2 at SLAC

Walker, R.C. ; Filippone, B. ; Jourdan, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 49 (1994) 5671-5689, 1994.
Inspire Record 360764 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22469

We report measurements of the proton form factors GEp and GMp extracted from elastic scattering in the range 1≤Q2≤3 (GeV/c)2 with total uncertainties < 15% in GEp and < 3% in GMp. Comparisons are made to theoretical models, including those based on perturbative QCD, vector-meson dominance, QCD sum rules, and diquark constituents in the proton. The results for GEp are somewhat larger than indicated by most theoretical parametrizations, and the ratios of the Pauli and Dirac form factors Q2(F2pF1p) are lower in value and demonstrate a weaker Q2 dependence than those predictions. A global extraction of the elastic form factors from several experiments in the range 0.1 0.1<Q2<10 (GeV/c)2 is also presented.

6 data tables

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

More…

Study of the Reaction $e^+ e^- \to p \bar{p}$ in the Total Energy Range 1925-{MeV} - 2180-{MeV}

Delcourt, B. ; Derado, I. ; Bertrand, J.L. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 86 (1979) 395-398, 1979.
Inspire Record 141565 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27308

The e + e − → p p cross section has been measured between 1925 and 2180 MeV. About 50 p p events were detected. The total cross section decreases from 1.31 ± 0.4 nb near 1937 MeV to 0.55 ± 0.2 nb near 2135 MeV. The proton form factors | G E | 2 and | G M | 2 , assumed identical, decrease from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 0.043 ± 0.015. They are an order of magnitude higher than predicted by the well-known dipole fit. The energy range has been scanned in steps of about 2 MeV. No significant structure was found in this p p sample.

1 data table

TOTAL CROSS SECTION ASSUMING ISOTROPIC PRODUCTION. RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS CALCULATED USING PEAKING APPROXIMATION (ABOUT 20 PCT). AUTHORS ALSO QUOTE RESULTS FOR LIMITED (COSMIC RAY FREE) ACCEPTANCE AS A CHECK. FORM FACTOR DERIVED ASSUMING ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FORM FACTORS EQUAL IN MAGNITUDE.


Study of the Reaction $e^+ e^- \to K^0_S K^0_L$ in the Total Energy Range 1.4-{GeV} to 2.18-{GeV} and Interpretation of the $K^+$ and $K^0$ Form-factors

Mane, F. ; Bisello, D. ; Bizot, J.C. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 99 (1981) 261-264, 1981.
Inspire Record 156053 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38245

The e + e − → K S 0 K L 0 cross section has been measured between 1400 and 2180 MeV. About 58 K S 0 K L 0 events were in the magnetic detector DM1 at the Orsay storage ring DCI. The charged and neutral kaon form factor behaviour suggests the existence of a new isoscalar vector meson at 1.65 GeV.

1 data table

No description provided.


Study of the Reaction $e^+ e^- \to K^+ K^-$ in the Total Energy Range 1400-{MeV} to 2060-{MeV}

Delcourt, B. ; Bisello, D. ; Bizot, J.C. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 99 (1981) 257-260, 1981.
Inspire Record 156054 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38243

The e + e − → K + K − cross section has been measured between 1400 and 2060 MeV. About 500 K + K − events were detected in the magnetic detector DM1 at the Orsay storage rings DCI. The charged kaon form factor is appreciably higher than predicted by only the ϱ, ω, ø tails, suggesting contributions from higher vector mesons.

1 data table

No description provided.


Precision measurement of the neutron magnetic form-factor

Anklin, H. ; Fritschi, D. ; Jourdan, J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 336 (1994) 313-318, 1994.
Inspire Record 384757 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28730

We present a precise measurement of the neutron magnetic form factor G mn at low momentum transfer ( q = 1.69 fm −1 ). From a simultaneous measurement of D ( e , e ′ n ) and D ( e , e ′ p ) we obtain the ratio of neutron and proton cross sections. The neutron detection efficiency is obtained from a separate measurement using tagged neutrons produced by H ( n , p ) n scattering of a monochromatic neutron beam. In contrast to previous determinations of G mn , the present value is insensitive to the systematic uncertainties in the interpretation of the data in terms of G mn and represents a determination of G mn to ±1.7%.

5 data tables

Using kinematics I.

Using kinematics II.

Using kinematics I. SD is simple dipole model.

More…