Study of the $e^+e^-\to K^+K^-$ reaction in the energy range from 2.6 to 8.0 GeV

The BaBar collaboration Lees, J.P. ; Poireau, V. ; Tisserand, V. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 92 (2015) 072008, 2015.
Inspire Record 1383130 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.73784

The $e^+e^-\to K^+K^-$ cross section and charged-kaon electromagnetic form factor are measured in the $e^+e^-$ center-of-mass energy range ($E$) from 2.6 to 8.0 GeV using the initial-state radiation technique with an undetected photon. The study is performed using 469 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II $e^+e^-$ collider at center-of-mass energies near 10.6 GeV. The form factor is found to decrease with energy faster than $1/E^2$, and approaches the asymptotic QCD prediction. Production of the $K^+K^-$ final state through the $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ intermediate states is observed. The results for the kaon form factor are used together with data from other experiments to perform a model-independent determination of the relative phases between single-photon and strong amplitudes in $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)\to K^+K^-$ decays. The values of the branching fractions measured in the reaction $e^+e^- \to K^+K^-$ are shifted relative to their true values due to interference between resonant and nonresonant amplitudes. The values of these shifts are determined to be about $\pm5\%$ for the $J/\psi$ meson and $\pm15\%$ for the $\psi(2S)$ meson.

1 data table

The $K^+K^-$ invariant-mass interval ($M_{K^+K^-}$), number of selected events ($N_{\rm sig}$) after background subtraction, detection efficiency ($\varepsilon$), ISR luminosity ($L$), measured $e^+e^-\to K^+K^-$ cross section ($\sigma_{K^+K^-}$), and the charged-kaon form factor ($|F_K|$). For the number of events and cross section. For the form factor, we quote the combined uncertainty. For the mass interval 7.5 - 8.0 GeV/$c^2$, the 90$\%$ CL upper limits for the cross section and form factor are listed.


Measurement of the proton form factor by studying $e^{+} e^{-}\rightarrow p\bar{p}$

The BESIII collaboration Ablikim, M. ; Achasov, M.N. ; Ai, X.C. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 91 (2015) 112004, 2015.
Inspire Record 1358937 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.73442

Using data samples collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, we measure the Born cross section of $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow p\bar{p}$ at 12 center-of-mass energies from 2232.4 to 3671.0 MeV. The corresponding effective electromagnetic form factor of the proton is deduced under the assumption that the electric and magnetic form factors are equal $(|G_{E}|= |G_{M}|)$. In addition, the ratio of electric to magnetic form factors, $|G_{E}/G_{M}|$, and $|G_{M}|$ are extracted by fitting the polar angle distribution of the proton for the data samples with larger statistics, namely at $\sqrt{s}=$ 2232.4 and 2400.0 MeV and a combined sample at $\sqrt{s}$ = 3050.0, 3060.0 and 3080.0 MeV, respectively. The measured cross sections are in agreement with recent results from BaBar, improving the overall uncertainty by about 30\%. The $|G_{E}/G_{M}|$ ratios are close to unity and consistent with BaBar results in the same $q^{2}$ region, which indicates the data are consistent with the assumption that $|G_{E}|=|G_{M}|$ within uncertainties.

1 data table

Summary of the Born cross section $\sigma_\text{Born}$, the effective FF $|G|$, and the related variables used to calculate the Born cross sections at the different c.m.energies $\sqrt{s}$, where $N_\text{obs}$ is the number of candidate events, $N_\text{bkg}$ is the estimated background yield, $\varepsilon^\prime=\varepsilon\times(1+\delta)$ is the product of detection efficiency $\varepsilon$ and the radiative correction factor $(1+\delta)$, and $L$ is the integrated luminosity. The first errors are statistical, and the second systematic.


Study of the process $e^+e^-\to n\bar{n}$ at the VEPP-2000 $e^+e^-$ collider with the SND detector

Achasov, M.N. ; Barnyakov, A.Yu. ; Beloborodov, K.I. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 90 (2014) 112007, 2014.
Inspire Record 1321689 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.71416

The process $e^+e^-\to n\bar{n}$ has been studied at the VEPP-2000 $e^+e^-$ collider with the SND detector in the energy range from threshold up to 2 GeV. As a result of the experiment, the $e^+e^-\to n\bar{n}$ cross section and effective neutron form factor have been measured.

2 data tables

The $e^+e^-\to n\bar{n}$ cross section ($\sigma_{n\bar{n}}$) and neutron effective form factor ($F_n$) measured in 2011. The quoted errors are statistical. The systematic error is 17$\%$ for the cross section and 9$\%$ for the form factor.

The $e^+e^-\to n\bar{n}$ cross section ($\sigma_{n\bar{n}}$) and neutron effective form factor ($F_n$) measured in 2012. The quoted errors are statistical. The systematic error is 17$\%$ for the cross section and 9$\%$ for the form factor. NOTE: corrected an apparent typo in paper for second-last data point (1990 $\to$ 1960) to make the numbers consistent with the plot in Figure 9.


Measurements of the magnetic form-factor of the proton for timelike momentum transfers

Andreotti, M ; Bagnasco, S ; Baldini, W ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 559 (2003) 20-25, 2003.
Inspire Record 617594 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27006

Fermilab experiment E835 has measured the cross section for the reaction p ̄ p→e + e − at s =11.63, 12.43, 14.40 and 18.22 GeV 2 . From the analysis of the 66 observed events new high-precision measurements of the proton magnetic form factor are obtained.

3 data tables

The measured cross section in the kinematic range defined by COS(THETA).

The proton magnetic form factor calculated assuming the equality of the electric and magnetic form factors.

The proton magnetic form factor calculated assuming a negligible electric contribution.


Measurements of the magnetic form factor of the proton in the timelike region at large momentum transfer.

The E835 collaboration Ambrogiani, M. ; Bagnasco, S. ; Baldini, W. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 60 (1999) 032002, 1999.
Inspire Record 496464 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.42105

The cross section for the reaction p¯p→e+e− has been measured at s=8.8, 10.8, 12.4, 13.1, and 14.4 GeV2 by Fermilab experiment E835. A non-magnetic spectrometer is used to identify the e+e− final states generated by the antiproton beam intersecting an internal hydrogen gas jet target. From the analysis of the 144 observed events, new high-precision measurements of the proton magnetic form factor for timelike momentum transfers are obtained.

3 data tables

No description provided.

Assuming ABS(FORMFACTOR(NAME=ELECTRIC)) = ABS(FORMFACTOR(NAME=MAGNETIC)).

Neglecting contribution for FORMFACTOR(NAME=ELECTRIC).


The first measurement of the neutron electromagnetic form factors in the timelike region.

Antonelli, A. ; Baldini, R. ; Benasi, P. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 517 (1998) 3-35, 1998.
Inspire Record 471263 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.32681

The electromagnetic form factors of the neutron in the time-like region have been measured for the first time, from the threshold up to q 2 ⋟ 6 GeV 2 . The neutron magnetic form factor turns out to be larger than the proton one; the angular distribution suggests that for the neutron, at variance with the proton case, electric and magnetic form factors could be different. Further measurements are also reported, concerning the proton form factors and the Σ Σ production, together with the multihadronic cross section and the J / Γ branching ratio into n n .

3 data tables

The uncertainty on the evaluated cross section is given by the quadratic combination of the following terms: the statistical uncertainty on the number of events, the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the luminosity (about 6PCT), the systematic uncertainty on the efficiency evaluation, dominated by the scanning efficiency contribution (about 15PCT). The SQRT(S) values with (C=NOMIN) and (C=SHIFT) correspond to the nominal energy and shifted energy analysis (see text of paper for details).

The uncertainty on the evaluated cross section is given by the quadratic combination of the following terms: the statistical uncertainty on the number of events, the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the luminosity (about 6PCT), the systematic uncertainty on the efficiency evaluation, dominated by the scanning efficiency contribution (about 15PCT). The NEUTRON formfactor value are calculated in two hypotheses: GE = GM and GE = 0.

The uncertainty on the evaluated cross section is given by the quadratic combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.


Measurement of the pseudoscalar decay constant, f(D).

The BES collaboration Bai, J.Z. ; Bardon, O. ; Blum, Ira K. ; et al.
SLAC-PUB-7147, 1996.
Inspire Record 421008 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.18760

None

2 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.


Upper Limits of the Proton Magnetic Form-factor in the Timelike Region From $\bar{p} p \to e^+ e^-$ at the {CERN} {ISR}

The Annecy(LAPP)-CERN-Genoa-Lyon-Oslo-Rome-Strasbourg-Turin collaboration Baglin, C. ; Baird, S. ; Bassompierre, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 163 (1985) 400-403, 1985.
Inspire Record 218159 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.49639

From the measurement of e + e - pairs from the reaction p̄p→e + e - at the CERN-ISR, using an antiproton beam and a hydrogen jet target, we derived upper limits for the proton magnetic form factor in the time-like region at Q 2 ⋍8.9( GeV c ) 2 and Q 2 ⋍12.5( GeV c ) 2 .

1 data table

No description provided.


A STUDY OF e+ e- ANNIHILATION IN THE 1400-MeV TO 2250-MeV ENERGY RANGE WITH THE MAGNETIC DETECTOR DM2 AT DCI

Augustin, J.E. ; Ayach, L. ; Calcaterra, A. ; et al.
LAL-83-21, 1983.
Inspire Record 192321 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.13242

None

5 data tables

ASSUMING ABS(GE)=ABS(GM).

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Elastic electron - Proton Scattering at Large Four Momentum Transfer

Kirk, Paul N. ; Breidenbach, Martin ; Friedman, Jerome I. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 8 (1973) 63-91, 1973.
Inspire Record 73424 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.21999

Electron-proton elastic-scattering cross sections have been measured at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center for four-momentum transfers squared q 2 from 1.0 to 25.0 (GeVc)2. The electric (GEp) and magnetic (GMp) form factors of the proton were not separated, since angular distributions were not measured at each q 2. However, values for GMp were derived assuming various relations between GEp and GMp. Several theoretical models for the behavior of the proton magnetic form factor at high values of q 2 are compared with the data.

22 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…