nucl-ex
Photoproduction
FORMFACTOR
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 4 of 4 results

The Charge Form Factor of the Proton at a Momentum Transfer of 75 F$^-^2$

Bartel, W. ; Dudelzak, B. ; Krehbiel, H. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 25 (1967) 236-237, 1967.
Inspire Record 1333753 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29448

The proton form factors GE(q2) and GM(q2) are determined at q2 = 75fm−2.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


Analysis of the Cabibbo suppressed decay D0 --> pi- l+ nu.

The E687 collaboration Frabetti, P.L. ; Cheung, H.W.K. ; Cumalat, John P. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 382 (1996) 312-322, 1996.
Inspire Record 419904 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.42285

Results for the Cabibbo suppressed semileptonic decays D 0 → π − e + ν and D 0 → π − μ + ν (charge conjugates are implied) are reported by Fermilab photoproduction experiment E687. We find 45.4 ± 13.3 events in the electron mode and 45.6 ± 11.8 in the muon mode. The relative branching ratio BR (D 0 →π − l + v) BR (D 0 →K − l + v) for the combined sample is measured to be 0.101 ± 0.020 (stat.) ± 0.003 (syst.) 14 .

1 data table
Table 1

CONST(C=V-CD and CONST(C=V-CS) are the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elemets.


Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form-factor in the $D (e, e^\prime) N P$ Reaction for Momentum Transfers 0.48-{GeV}$^2 \le Q^2 \le$ 0.83-{GeV}$^2$

Esaulov, A.S. ; Rekalo, A.P. ; Rekalo, M.P. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 45 (1987) 258-262, 1987.
Inspire Record 250500 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.2500

None

7 data tables
Table 1

REID POTENTIAL AND SPECIAL PARAMETRIZATION FOR ELECTRIC FORMFACTOR OF NEUTRON HAVE BEEN USED.

Table 2

REID POTENTIAL AND ELECTRIC FORMFACTOR OF NEUTRON EQUAL 0 HAVE BEEN USED.

Table 3

PARIS POTENTIAL AND SPECIAL PARAMETRIZATION FOR ELECTRIC FORMFACTOR OF NEUTRON HAVE BEEN USED.

More…

Backward electron-deuteron scattering below 280 mev

Ganichot, D. ; Grossetete, B. ; Isabelle, D.B. ;
Nucl.Phys.A 178 (1972) 545-562, 1972.
Inspire Record 75366 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.8775

We measured the elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons on deuterium at 180° for four incident energies (70, 140, 210 and 280 MeV). The data were analysed with a technique allowing an accurate comparison between experiment and theory. We observed a good agreement for the inelastic data with the expected cross section, using the presently available models and nucleon form factors. The experimental elastic cross section is systematically larger than the predicted cross sections.

16 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…