Intermittency in hadronic decays of the Z0

The OPAL collaboration Akrawy, M.Z. ; Alexander, G. ; Allison, J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 262 (1991) 351-361, 1991.
Inspire Record 314631 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29397

A factorial moment analysis has been performed on the differential multiplicity distributions of hadronic final states of the Z 0 recorded with the OPAL detector at LEP. The moments of the one-dimensional rapidity and the two-dimensional rapidity versus azimuthal angle distributions are found to exhibit “intermittent” behaviour attributable to the jet structure of the events. The moments are reproduced by both parton shower and matrix element QCD based hadronisation models. No evidence for fluctuations beyond those attributable to jet structure is observed.

3 data tables

Corrected factorial moments of the rapidity distribution with respect to the sphericity axis. The errors shown are statistical only but include the statistical error onthe correction factor, added in quadrature.

Corrected factorial moments of the rapidity distribution with respect to the electron beam axis. The errors shown are statistical only but include the statistical error onthe correction factor, added in quadrature.

Corrected factorial moments of the rapidity (with respect to the sphericityaxis) versus PHI distribution. For each point the NUMBER of bins are constructe d from equal numbers of YRAP and PHI bins. The errors shown are statistical only but include the statistical error onthe correction factor, added in quadrature.


Characteristics of helium fragments produced in Si-28 emulsion interactions at 14.5-A-GeV

Singh, G. ; Ismail, A.Z.M. ; Jain, P.L. ;
Phys.Rev.C 43 (1991) 2417-2421, 1991.
Inspire Record 323101 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26112

We report the measurements on partial production cross sections of the multiple helium fragments emitted in the interactions of Si28 ions at 14.5A GeV in nuclear emulsion. Interaction mean free paths of the helium fragments have been investigated on the basis of helium multiplicity and size of the target nucleus as a function of the distance from their production points. Multiplicity scaling in the produced helium fragments is also observed.

5 data tables

FIRST REACTION RESPECTS CENTRAL, SECOND - PERIPHERAL INELASTIC INTERACTION.

FIRST REACTION RESPECTS CENTRAL, SECOND - PERIPHERAL INTERACTION. THIRD REACTION RESPECT 0HE PRODUCTION.

MULT(FRAGT) IS AVERAGED NUMBER OF HEAVY TRACKS FROM THE TARGET NUCLEUS, MULT(SHOWER) IS AVERAGED NUMBER OF MINIMUM IONIZING SHOWER TRACKS WHICH INCLUDED THE NUMBER OF SINGLY CHARGED PROJECTILE PROTON TRACKS.

More…

Multiplicity of Charged Particles in 800-{GeV} $p p$ Interactions

The LEBC-MPS collaboration Ammar, R. ; Aziz, T. ; Banerjee, S. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 178 (1986) 124-128, 1986.
Inspire Record 231133 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6558

Results are reported concerning the charged-particle multiplicity distribution obtained in an exposure of the high-resolution hydrogen bubble chamber LEBC to a beam of 800 GeV protons at the Fermilab MPS. This is the first time that such data have been available at this energy. The distribution of the number n ch of charged particles produced in inelastic interactions obeys KNO-scaling. The average multiplicity is 〈 n ch 〉 = 10.26±0.15. For n ch ⩾8 the data can be well fitted to a negative binomial. The difference between the overall experimental multiplicity distribution and that resulting from the latter fit is in agreement with the contribution expected from diffractive processes.

5 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Topological Cross-sections and Charged Particle Multiplicities in $p p$ Interactions at 360-{GeV}/$c$

The EHS-RCBC collaboration Bailly, J.L. ; Banerjee, S. ; Bartl, W. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 23 (1984) 205, 1984.
Inspire Record 195218 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.2141

Using data obtained with EHS equipped with the Rapid Cycling Bubble Chamber (RCBC) exposed to a proton beam of 360 GeV/c, we calculate topological cross sections. We present in great detail the procedure and the techniques used to correct raw data. Finally, we give multiplicity moments and multiplicity correlations and we compare the values obtained in our experiment, together with data at other energies, with different models.

13 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…