E+ E- --> CHARM X
Single Differential Cross Section
SIG
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 16 results

rivet Analysis
Observation of the D*0 (2459) in e+ e- Annihilation

The ARGUS collaboration Albrecht, H. ; Bockmann, P. ; Glaser, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 221 (1989) 422-426, 1989.
Inspire Record 268577 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29827

Using the ARGUS detector at the DORIS II storage ring at DESY, we have observed a charmed meson of mass (2455±3±5) MeV/c2, decaying to D + π − . The natural width of this state is determined to be (15 +13+5 −10−10 ) MeV c 2 . The fragmentation function is hard, as expected for a leading charmed particle from nonresonant e + e − annihilation. Analysis of the decay angular distribution supports the hypothesis that the observed state is an L =1 excited charmed meson with spin-parity 2 + .

2 data tables
Table 1

Corrected to zero momentum using fragmentation function of Peterson et al., PR D29 (83) 105.

Table 2

Data read from graph.


rivet Analysis
Production Cross-section and Electroweak Asymmetry of $D^*$ and $D$ Mesons Produced in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations at 29-{GeV}

Baringer, Philip S. ; Bylsma, B.G. ; DeBonte, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 206 (1988) 551-556, 1988.
Inspire Record 23360 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6192

The production of D * and D mesons has been studied in e + e − annihilations at √s = 29GeV. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 300 pb −1 , were obtained using the HRS detector at PEP. The cross section is measured to be R (D 0 + D + ) = 2.40±0.35 and we determine the electroweak asymmetry to be −9.9 ± 2.7%, which corresponds to an axial vector coupling constant product g e g c = 0.26 ± 0.07.

11 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

rivet Analysis
$\eta$ and $\eta^\prime$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}: Indications for the $D(s$)+- Decays Into $\eta \pi^\pm$ and $\eta^\prime \pi^\pm$

Wormser, G. ; Abrams, G.S. ; Amidei, D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 61 (1988) 1057, 1988.
Inspire Record 261194 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20080

η production has been investigated by the Mark II collaboration at the SLAC e+e− storage ring PEP. η particles are reconstructed by their γγ decay mode. The η fragmentation function has been measured and found to be in good agreement with the Lund-model prediction. η′ production has been measured for the first time in high-energy e+e− annihilation. There is evidence at the 3σ level for Ds± decay into ηπ± and η′π±.

4 data tables
Table 1

Numerical values supplied by G.Wormser.

Table 2

Z = 0.0 point extrapolated using LUND fragmentation model.

Table 3

Z = 0.0 point extrapolated using LUND fragmentation model.

More…

Charm Production in Nonresonant e+ e- Annihilations at s**(1/2) = 10.55-GeV

The CLEO collaboration Bortoletto, D. ; Goldberg, M. ; Holmes, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 37 (1988) 1719, 1988.
Inspire Record 22954 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23269

We report results on the differential and total cross sections for inclusive production of the charmed particles D*+, D*0, D0, D+, Ds, and Λc in e+e− annihilations at √s=10.55 GeV. Widely used quark fragmentation models are discussed and compared with the measured charmed-particle momentum distributions. This comparison, as well as that with measurements at other center-of-mass energies, shows the need to take QCD corrections into account and their importance for a correct interpretation of the model parameters. The observed rate of D0 and D+ production is compared to the expected total charm production cross section. We measure the probability of a charmed meson being produced as a vector meson and the D*+ decay branching fraction into D0π+.

14 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

$\Lambda(c$) Production From $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation in the $\Upsilon$ Energy Region

The CLEO collaboration Bowcock, T.J.V. ; Giles, R.T. ; Hassard, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 55 (1985) 923, 1985.
Inspire Record 214874 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20302

We have observed Λc baryons in nonresonant e+e− annihilation at energies around s=10.5 GeV through their decay to Λπ+π+π−. We measure the branching fraction to be (2.8 ± 0.7 ± 1.1)%. The momentum spectrum of the Λc is similar to that of charmed mesons, providing a constraint on models of charmed-quark hadronization.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Data are extrapolated over whole x range using the 'Peterson' formula.


rivet Analysis
Production of $\phi$ and F (1970) $\to \phi \pi$ in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Derrick, M. ; Fernandez, E. ; Fries, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 54 (1985) 2568, 1985.
Inspire Record 213242 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20340

Data from the high-resolution spectrometer at PEP have been used to study the inclusive production of φ mesons and F± mesons decaying into φπ±. Fragmentation functions and cross sections are presented and compared to existing data. The total φ cross section at 29 GeV is 40±6 pb. The observed F signal in the region z>0.4, given the assumption that R(F)[R(F)+R(D)]=0.15, corresponds to an F→φπ branching ratio of (3.3±1.1)%. The measured F mass is 1963±3±3 MeV/c2.

5 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

WITH THE FOLLOWING ANGLE CUTS ON THE DECAY REGIONS. PHI DECAY - ABS(COS(THETA)) >0.5.

More…

Charged $D^*$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV} and a Limit on D0 - Anti-d0 Mixing

Yamamoto, H. ; Atwood, W.B. ; Baillon, P. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 54 (1985) 522-525, 1985.
Inspire Record 205132 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20325

We have studied inclusive D*± production using the DELCO detector at PEP. Our technique involved kaon identification in the momentum range above 3.2 GeV/c using a threshold gas Čerenkov counter. This leads to a model-independent upper limit on D0−D¯0 mixing of 8.1% (90% confidence level). We also have measured the charm fragmentation function, which peaks at x≡PD*(Ebeam2−MD*2)12 of 0.56±0.06(stat.), and the total cross section for D* production, σ(D*±)=0.140±0.021(stat.)±0.032(syst.) nb (x>0.3, with radiative correction).

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

SYSTEMATIC ERROR DOES NOT INCLUDE THE UNCERTAINTY ON THE BRANCHING RATIOS USED.


Evidence for the $F^*$ meson

The TPC/Two Gamma collaboration Aihara, H. ; Alston-Garnjost, M. ; Badtke, D.H. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 53 (1984) 2465, 1984.
Inspire Record 203890 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20409

Evidence for a narrow state decaying into an F meson and a photon has been obtained in e+e− annihilation events at 29-GeV c.m. energy. This state lies 139.5 ± 8.3(stat.) ± 9.7(syst.) MeV above the F-meson mass and is consistent with the expected F* meson. The F mesons are identified by a peak in the K+K−Kπ± mass at 1.948±0.028±0.010 GeV.

2 data tables
Table 1

DATA REQUESTED FROM AUTHORS.

Table 2

IN (K+K-PI+) THE AUTHORS INCLUDE OTHER DECAY MODES SUCH AS (AK*0 K+),(PHI PI+),(K+ K- PI+,PI0),(K+ K- MU+ NU) WHICH CANNOT BE RESOLVED.


Production and Decay of the Charged D* Mesons in e+ e- Annihilation at 10-GeV Center-Of-Mass Energy

The ARGUS collaboration Albrecht, H. ; Binder, U. ; Drews, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 150 (1985) 235-241, 1985.
Inspire Record 204851 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30448

Using the ARGUS detector at DORIS we have observed the prediction of the charged D ∗ meson in e + e − annihilation at a center of mass energy of 10 GeV. The D ∗ fragmentation function has been measured using the decay channels D ∗+ → D 0 π + and D 0 → K − π + and K − π + π + π − .

2 data tables
Table 1

RESULTS EXTRAPOLATED TO X>O. SYSTEMATIC ERRORS INCLUDED.

Table 2

ERRORS ARE STATISTICAL ONLY.


PROMPT ELECTRON PRODUCTION IN ELECTRON - POSITRON ANNIHILATIONS AT 29-GeV

Koop, Dale E. ;
CALT-68-1149, 1984.
Inspire Record 201707 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.50118

None

7 data tables
Table 1

Axis error includes +- 9/9 contribution (DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN DETECTION EFFICIENCIES//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN LUMINOSITY//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN BACKGROUND SUBSTRUCTIONS).

Table 2

Axis error includes +- 9/9 contribution (DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN DETECTION EFFICIENCIES//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN LUMINOSITY//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN BACKGROUND SUBSTRUCTIONS).

Table 3

Axis error includes +- 9/9 contribution (DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN DETECTION EFFICIENCIES//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN LUMINOSITY//DUE TO UNCERTAINTIES IN BACKGROUND SUBSTRUCTIONS).

More…