Electron production
DSIG/DOMEGA
[3.203]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

Measurements of the proton elastic form-factors for 1-GeV/c**2 <= Q**2 <= 3-GeV/C**2 at SLAC

Walker, R.C. ; Filippone, B. ; Jourdan, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 49 (1994) 5671-5689, 1994.
Inspire Record 360764 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22469

We report measurements of the proton form factors GEp and GMp extracted from elastic scattering in the range 1≤Q2≤3 (GeV/c)2 with total uncertainties < 15% in GEp and < 3% in GMp. Comparisons are made to theoretical models, including those based on perturbative QCD, vector-meson dominance, QCD sum rules, and diquark constituents in the proton. The results for GEp are somewhat larger than indicated by most theoretical parametrizations, and the ratios of the Pauli and Dirac form factors Q2(F2pF1p) are lower in value and demonstrate a weaker Q2 dependence than those predictions. A global extraction of the elastic form factors from several experiments in the range 0.1 0.1<Q2<10 (GeV/c)2 is also presented.

6 data tables
Table 1

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Table 2

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Table 3

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

More…

Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2

Andivahis, L. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; Lung, A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 50 (1994) 5491-5517, 1994.
Inspire Record 372566 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22354

The proton elastic form factors GEp(Q2) and GMp(Q2) have been extracted for Q2=1.75 to 8.83 (GeV/c)2 via a Rosenbluth separation to ep elastic cross section measurements in the angular range 13°≤θ≤90°. The Q2 range covered more than doubles that of the existing data. For Q2<4 (GeV/c)2, where the data overlap with previous measurements, the total uncertainties have been reduced to < 14% in GEp and < 1.5% in GMp. Results for GEp(Q2) are consistent with the dipole fit GD(Q2)=(1+Q2/0.71)−2, while those for GMp(Q2)/μpGD(Q2) decrease smoothly from 1.05 to 0.92. Deviations from form factor scaling are observed up to 20%. The ratio Q2F2/F1 is observed to approach a constant value for Q2>3 (GeV/c)2. Comparisons are made to vector meson dominance, dimensional scaling, QCD sum rule, diquark, and constituent quark models, none of which fully characterize all the new data.

8 data tables
Table 1

Axis error includes +- 1.6/1.6 contribution (Point-to-point systematic error. The quadrature sum of the point-to-point uncertainties in all quantities which defined the cross section).

Table 2

Axis error includes +- 1.6/1.6 contribution (Point-to-point systematic error. The quadrature sum of the point-to-point uncertainties in all quantities which defined the cross section).

Table 3

Axis error includes +- 1.6/1.6 contribution (Point-to-point systematic error. The quadrature sum of the point-to-point uncertainties in all quantities which defined the cross section).

More…

OBSERVATION OF INVERSE ELECTROPRODUCTION OF PIONS ON C-12 NUCLEUS AT 164-MeV PION ENERGY AND DETERMINATION OF F1(v) NUCLEON FORM-FACTOR

Alekseev, G.D. ; Blokhintseva, T.D. ; Karpukhin, V.V. ; et al.
Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 46 (1987) 801, 1987.
Inspire Record 247868 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.38865

None

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.