Measurement of the eta and eta' transition form factors at q**2 = 112-GeV**2.

The BaBar collaboration Aubert, Bernard ; Barate, R. ; Bona, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 012002, 2006.
Inspire Record 716277 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22085

We report a study of the processes e+e- -> eta gamma and e+e- -> etaprime gamma at a center-of-mass energy of 10.58 GeV, using a 232 fb^-1 data sample collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II collider at SLAC. We observe 20+6-5 eta gamma and 50+8-7 etaprime gamma events over small backgrounds, and measure the cross sections sigma(e+e- -> eta gamma) =4.5+1.2-1.1(stat)+-0.3(sys) fb and sigma(e+e- -> etaprime gamma)=5.4+-0.8(stat)+-0.3(sys) fb. The corresponding transition form factors at q^2 = 112 GeV^2 are q^2|F_eta(q^2)|=0.229+-0.030+-0.008 GeV, and q^2|F_etaprime(q^2)|=0.251+-0.019+-0.008 GeV, respectively.

3 data tables match query

Measured cross sections.

Undressed cross sections calculated by applying a 7.5 +- 0.2 PCT correction for vacuum polarization.

Transition form factors at Q**2 = 112 GeV**2.


Evidence for spin one resonance production in the reaction gamma gamma* ---> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0

The TPC/Two Gamma collaboration Bauer, Daniel A. ; Belcinski, R. ; Berg, R.C. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 48 (1993) 3976-3987, 1993.
Inspire Record 353748 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22574

Using data from the TPC/Two-Gamma experiment at the SLAC e+e− storage ring PEP, a C=+1 resonance has been observed in the π+π−π0γ final state resulting from the fusion of one nearly real and one quite virtual photon. The actual decay channel is probably π+π−π0π0, where one final-state photon is not detected, and the mass of the fully reconstructed state would be approximately 1525 MeV. A four-pion decay mode in turn implies that the resonance has even isospin. The nonobservation of this R(1525) when both initial-state photons are nearly real suggests a spin-1 assignment. Since the large measured value of the product of the branching ratio into π+π−π0π0 and the γγ coupling makes it unlikely that this state is the mostly s¯s f1(1510), its interpretation may lie outside of conventional meson spectroscopy. There is a second, less-significant enhancement observed in the same reaction at a four-pion mass centered around 2020 MeV.

2 data tables match query

No description provided.

Coupling parameter times the effective form factor.


Measurements of the proton elastic form-factors for 1-GeV/c**2 <= Q**2 <= 3-GeV/C**2 at SLAC

Walker, R.C. ; Filippone, B. ; Jourdan, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 49 (1994) 5671-5689, 1994.
Inspire Record 360764 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22469

We report measurements of the proton form factors GEp and GMp extracted from elastic scattering in the range 1≤Q2≤3 (GeV/c)2 with total uncertainties < 15% in GEp and < 3% in GMp. Comparisons are made to theoretical models, including those based on perturbative QCD, vector-meson dominance, QCD sum rules, and diquark constituents in the proton. The results for GEp are somewhat larger than indicated by most theoretical parametrizations, and the ratios of the Pauli and Dirac form factors Q2(F2pF1p) are lower in value and demonstrate a weaker Q2 dependence than those predictions. A global extraction of the elastic form factors from several experiments in the range 0.1 0.1<Q2<10 (GeV/c)2 is also presented.

6 data tables match query

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

More…

The Pion Electromagnetic Form-factor in the Timelike Energy Range 1.35-{GeV} $\le \sqrt{s} \le$ 2.4-{GeV}

The DM2 collaboration Bisello, D. ; Busetto, G. ; Castro, A. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 220 (1989) 321-327, 1989.
Inspire Record 267118 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29829

The e + e − → π + π − cross section has been measured from about 280 events (an order of magnitude more than the previous world statistics) in the energy interval 1.35 ⩽ s ⩽ 2.4 GeV with the DM2 detector at DCI. The pion squared form factor | F π | 2 shows a deep minimum around 1.6 GeV/ c 2 and is better fit under the hypothesis of two ϱ-like resonance ⋍0.25 GeV/ c 2 wide with 1.42 and 1.77 GeV/ c 2 masses.

1 data table match query

Statistical errors only.


Measurement of the Pion Form-factor in the Timelike Region for $q^2$ Values Between .1-{GeV}/$c^2$ and .18-{GeV}/$c^2$

Amendolia, S.R. ; Badelek, B. ; Batignani, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 138 (1984) 454-458, 1984.
Inspire Record 195944 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30572

The EM form factor of the pion has been studied in the time-like region by measuring σ (e + e − → π + π − ) normalized to σ (e + e − → μ + μ − ). Results have been obtained for q 2 down to the physical threshold.

1 data table match query

No description provided.


A Measurement of the Pion Charge Radius

Amendolia, S.R. ; Badelek, B. ; Batignani, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 146 (1984) 116-120, 1984.
Inspire Record 201598 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30511

We report a measurement of the negative pion electromagnetic form factor in the range of space-like four-momentum transfer 0.014 < q 2 < 0.122 (GeV/ c ) 2 . The measurement was made by the NA7 collaboration at the CERN SPS, by observing the interaction of 300 GeV pions with the electrons of a liquid hydrogen target. The form factor is fitted by a pole form with a pion radius of 〈r 2 〈 1 2 = 0.657 ± 0.012 fm.

1 data table match query

Errors are statistical only.


Momentum Analysis of Kaon and Pion Pairs Produced from Timelike Photons at 1.6-GeV Energy

Esposito, B. ; Felicetti, F. ; Marini, A. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 67 (1977) 239-242, 1977.
Inspire Record 124109 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27574

We present results for the total cross section of e + e − annihilation into two hadrons at 1.6 GeV: σ ππ = σ KK = (1.8 ± 1.1) × 10 -33 cm 2 .From these values we obtain the time-like electromagnetic form factors these mesons: | F π | 2 = 0.24 ± 0.14 and | F K | 2 = 0.46 ± 0.26.

1 data table match query

No description provided.


Measurement of Elastic electron - Neutron Cross-Sections Up to Q**2 = 10-(GeV/c)**2

Rock, Stephen ; Arnold, R.G. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 49 (1982) 1139, 1982.
Inspire Record 179135 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20575

The elastic electron-neutron cross section has been measured at four-momentum transfers squared (Q2) of 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 (GeV/c)2 with use of a deuterium target and detection of the scattered electrons at 10°. The ratio of neutron to proton elastic cross sections decreases with Q2. At high Q2 this trend is inconsistent with the dipole law, form-factor scaling, and many vector dominance models, although it is consistent with some parton models.

2 data tables match query

No description provided.

No description provided.


Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2

Bosted, Peter E. ; Clogher, L. ; Lung, A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 68 (1992) 3841-3844, 1992.
Inspire Record 332962 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19849

The proton elastic electric and magnetic form factors, GEp(Q2) and GMp(Q2), have been separately measured in the range Q2=1.75 to 8.83 (GeV/c)2, more than doubling the Q2 range of previous data. Scaled by the dipole fit, GD(Q2), the results for GMp(Q2)/μpGD(Q2) decrease smoothly from 1.05 to 0.91, while GEp(Q2)/GD(Q2) is consistent with unity. Comparisons are made to QCD sum rule, diquark, constitutent quark, and vector meson dominance models, none of which agree with all of the new data. The ratio Q2F2/F1 approaches a constant value for Q2>3 (GeV/c)2.

2 data tables match query

Magnetic form factors.

Electric form factors.


Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the neutron from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 4-GeV/c**2

Lung, A. ; Stuart, L.M. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 70 (1993) 718-721, 1993.
Inspire Record 342252 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19739

Quasielastic e-d cross sections have been measured at forward and backward angles. Rosenbluth separations were done to obtain RL and RT at Q2=1.75, 2.50, 3.25, and 4.00 (GeV/c)2. The neutron form factors GEn and GMn have been extracted using a nonrelativistic model. The sensitivity to deuteron wave function, relativistic corrections, and models of the inelastic background are reported. The results for GMn are consistent with the dipole form, while GEn is consistent with zero. Comparisons are made to theoretical models based on vector meson dominance, perturbative QCD, and QCD sum rules, as well as constituent quarks.

2 data tables match query

Magnetic form factors.

Electric form factors.