List of relative uncertainties in the measured cross sections of the $t\bar{t}Z$ and $t\bar{t}W$ processes from the fit, grouped in categories. All uncertainties are symmetrized. The sum in quadrature may not be equal to the total due to correlations between uncertainties introduced by the fit.

The expected and observed 68% and 95% confidence intervals, which include the value 0, for $\mathcal{C}_{i}/\Lambda^{2}$ for the EFT coefficients $\mathcal{C}_{\phi Q}^{(3)}$, $\mathcal{C}_{\phi t}$, $\mathcal{C}_{tB}$ and $\mathcal{C}_{tW}$. The intervals for $\mathcal{C}_{\phi Q}^{(3)}$ are derived setting $\mathcal{C}_{\phi Q}^{(1)}$ to zero; the measurement is sensitive to the difference $\mathcal{C}_{\phi Q}^{(3)}-\mathcal{C}_{\phi Q}^{(1)}$. All results are given in units of 1/TeV$^{2}$. Limits from fits for the EFT coefficients with only the linear term are also shown.

Upper limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of $m_{e^*}$ in the $e\nu J$ channel. The $\pm 1(2)\sigma$ uncertainty bands around the expected limit represent all sources of systematic and statistical uncertainties.

Lower limits on $\Lambda$ as a function of $m_{e^*}$ for the $eejj$ channel. The $\pm\ 1(2)\sigma$ uncertainty bands around the expected limit represent all sources of systematic and statistical uncertainties. The limits for $m_{e^*}\gt4$ TeV are the result of extrapolation.

Lower limits on $\Lambda$ as a function of $m_{e^*}$ for the $e\nu J$ channel. The $\pm\ 1(2)\sigma$ uncertainty bands around the expected limit represent all sources of systematic and statistical uncertainties.

Lower limits on $\Lambda$ as a function of $m_{e^*}$ combined for the $eejj$ and the $e\nu J$ channels. The $\pm\ 1(2)\sigma$ uncertainty bands around the expected limit represent all sources of systematic and statistical uncertainties. The limits for $m_{e^*}\gt4$ TeV are the result of extrapolation.

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Unfolded Dijet conditional yields (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions. Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=250$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The systematic uncertainty on the unfolded distribution as a function of minimax-mbl, broken down by components.

The covariance matrix for the unfolded, normalized data in bins of minimax-mbl shown in Figure 2. Redundant entries are suppressed.

Leading lepton transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading lepton transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading lepton pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading lepton pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading b-jet transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading b-jet transverse momentum distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Leading b-jet pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

Sub-leading b-jet pseudorapidity distribution for events passing the signal selection in bins of minimax-mbl. The data here are not unfolded.

The detector-level minimax-m(bl) distribution for events entering the Z+jets control region.

The detector-level minimax-m(bl) distribution for events entering the same-sign lepton control region.