Showing 50 of 1923 results
In this letter, measurements of the shared momentum fraction ($z_{\rm{g}}$) and the groomed jet radius ($R_{\rm{g}}$), as defined in the SoftDrop algorihm, are reported in \pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 200$ GeV collected by the STAR experiment. These substructure observables are differentially measured for jets of varying resolution parameters from $R = 0.2 - 0.6$ in the transverse momentum range $15 < p_{\rm{T, jet}} < 60$ GeV$/c$. These studies show that, in the $p_{\rm{T, jet}}$ range accessible at $\sqrt{s} = 200$ GeV and with increasing jet resolution parameter and jet transverse momentum, the $z_{\rm{g}}$ distribution asymptotically converges to the DGLAP splitting kernel for a quark radiating a gluon. The groomed jet radius measurements reflect a momentum-dependent narrowing of the jet structure for jets of a given resolution parameter, i.e., the larger the $p_{\rm{T, jet}}$, the narrower the first splitting. For the first time, these fully corrected measurements are compared to Monte Carlo generators with leading order QCD matrix elements and leading log in the parton shower, and to state-of-the-art theoretical calculations at next-to-leading-log accuracy. We observe that PYTHIA 6 with parameters tuned to reproduce RHIC measurements is able to quantitatively describe data, whereas PYTHIA 8 and HERWIG 7, tuned to reproduce LHC data, are unable to provide a simultaneous description of both $z_{\rm{g}}$ and $R_{\rm{g}}$, resulting in opportunities for fine parameter tuning of these models for \pp collisions at RHIC energies. We also find that the theoretical calculations without non-perturbative corrections are able to qualitatively describe the trend in data for jets of large resolution parameters at high $p_{\rm{T, jet}}$, but fail at small jet resolution parameters and low jet transverse momenta.
The data points and the error bars represent the mean $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{det}}$ and the width (RMS) for a given $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{part}}$ selection $R = 0.4$.
The data points and the error bars represent the mean $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{det}}$ and the width (RMS) for a given $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{part}}$ selection $R = 0.2$.
The data points and the error bars represent the mean $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{det}}$ and the width (RMS) for a given $p_{\rm{T, jet}}^{\rm{part}}$ selection $R = 0.6$.
A measurement of novel event shapes quantifying the isotropy of collider events is performed in 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions with $\sqrt s=13$ TeV centre-of-mass energy recorded with the ATLAS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. These event shapes are defined as the Wasserstein distance between collider events and isotropic reference geometries. This distance is evaluated by solving optimal transport problems, using the 'Energy-Mover's Distance'. Isotropic references with cylindrical and circular symmetries are studied, to probe the symmetries of interest at hadron colliders. The novel event-shape observables defined in this way are infrared- and collinear-safe, have improved dynamic range and have greater sensitivity to isotropic radiation patterns than other event shapes. The measured event-shape variables are corrected for detector effects, and presented in inclusive bins of jet multiplicity and the scalar sum of the two leading jets' transverse momenta. The measured distributions are provided as inputs to future Monte Carlo tuning campaigns and other studies probing fundamental properties of QCD and the production of hadronic final states up to the TeV-scale.
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 1)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 2)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 3)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 4)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 5)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 6)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 7)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 8)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 9)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 10)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 11)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 12)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 13)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 14)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 15)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 16)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 17)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 18)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 19)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 20)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 21)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 22)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 23)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 24)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 25)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 26)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 27)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 28)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 29)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 30)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 31)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 32)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 33)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 34)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 35)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 36)
IRing2 covariance, complete
1-IRing128 covariance, complete
1-ICyl16 covariance, complete
We present an angular analysis of the $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{\ast+}(\rightarrow K_{S}^{0}\pi^{+})\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay using 9$\,\mbox{fb}^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected with the LHCb experiment. For the first time, the full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured in intervals of the dimuon invariant mass squared. Local deviations from Standard Model predictions are observed, similar to those in previous LHCb analyses of the isospin-partner $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{\ast0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay. The global tension is dependent on which effective couplings are considered and on the choice of theory nuisance parameters.
Results for the CP-averaged observables Fl, Afb and S3–S9. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Results for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
The CP-averaged observable Fl versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S3 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S4 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S5 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable Afb versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S7 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S8 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S9 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable Fl versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P1 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P2 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P3 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P4' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P5' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P6' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P8' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 0.10 < q2 < 0.98 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 2.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 2.50 < q2 < 4.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 4.00 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 6.00 < q2 < 8.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 11.00 < q2 < 12.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 17.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 17.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 0.10 < q2 < 0.98 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 2.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 2.50 < q2 < 4.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 4.00 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 6.00 < q2 < 8.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 11.00 < q2 < 12.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 17.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 17.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Measurements of jet substructure describing the composition of quark- and gluon-initiated jets are presented. Proton-proton (pp) collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ =13 TeV collected with the CMS detector are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Generalized angularities are measured that characterize the jet substructure and distinguish quark- and gluon-initiated jets. These observables are sensitive to the distributions of transverse momenta and angular distances within a jet. The analysis is performed using a data sample of dijet events enriched in gluon-initiated jets, and, for the first time, a Z+jet event sample enriched in quark-initiated jets. The observables are measured in bins of jet transverse momentum, and as a function of the jet radius parameter. Each measurement is repeated applying a "soft drop" grooming procedure that removes soft and large angle radiation from the jet. Using these measurements, the ability of various models to describe jet substructure is assessed, showing a clear need for improvements in Monte Carlo generators.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
A measurement of jet substructure observables is presented using \ttbar events in the lepton+jets channel from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Multiple jet substructure observables are measured for jets identified as bottom, light-quark, and gluon jets, as well as for inclusive jets (no flavor information). The results are unfolded to the particle level and compared to next-to-leading-order predictions from POWHEG interfaced with the parton shower generators PYTHIA 8 and HERWIG 7, as well as from SHERPA 2 and DIRE2. A value of the strong coupling at the Z boson mass, $\alpha_S(m_\mathrm{Z}) = $ 0.115$^{+0.015}_{-0.013}$, is extracted from the substructure data at leading-order plus leading-log accuracy.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Measurements of the top quark polarization and top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) spin correlations are presented using events containing two oppositely charged leptons (e$^+$e$^-$, e$^\pm\mu^\mp$, or $\mu^+\mu^-$) produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. A set of parton-level normalized differential cross sections, sensitive to each of the independent coefficients of the spin-dependent parts of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production density matrix, is measured for the first time at 13 TeV. The measured distributions and extracted coefficients are compared with standard model predictions from simulations at next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), and from NLO QCD calculations including electroweak corrections. All measurements are found to be consistent with the expectations of the standard model. The normalized differential cross sections are used in fits to constrain the anomalous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark to $-$0.24 $<C_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.07 TeV$^{-2}$ and $-$0.33 $< C^{I}_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.20 TeV$^{-2}$, respectively, at 95% confidence level.
The measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections of the Higgs boson decaying to a pair of photons are presented. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collisions data recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross section is measured to be $\sigma_\mathrm{fid}$ = 73.4 $_{-5.3}^{+5.4}$ (stat) ${}_{-2.2}^{+2.4}$ (syst) fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of 75.4 $\pm$ 4.1 fb. The measurements are also performed in fiducial regions targeting different production modes and as function of several observables describing the diphoton system, the number of additional jets present in the event, and other kinematic observables. Two double differential measurements are performed. No significant deviations from the standard model expectations are observed.
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Energy correlators that describe energy-weighted distances between two or three particles in a jet are measured using an event sample of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb$^{-1}$. The measured distributions reveal two key features of the strong interaction: confinement and asymptotic freedom. By comparing the ratio of the two measured distributions with theoretical calculations that resum collinear emissions at approximate next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy matched to a next-to-leading order calculation, the strong coupling is determined at the Z boson mass: $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ = 0.1229$^{+0.0040}_{-0.0050}$, the most precise $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ value obtained using jet substructure observables.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
The fitted slopes of the E3C/E2C data distributions as a function of jet pt are used to illustrate the dependency of alphas on jet pt.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
The chi2 scan result using eq.3 for different alphas.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The energy weight of E2C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
The energy weight of E3C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
Results are presented from a search for CP violation in top quark pair production, using proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data used for this analysis consist of final states with two charged leptons collected by the CMS experiment, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The search uses two observables, $\mathcal{O}_1$ and $\mathcal{O}_3$, which are Lorentz scalars. The observable $\mathcal{O}_1$ is constructed from the four-momenta of the charged leptons and the reconstructed top quarks, while $\mathcal{O}_3$ consists of the four-momenta of the charged leptons and the b quarks originating from the top quarks. Asymmetries in these observables are sensitive to CP violation, and their measurement is used to determine the chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quark. The results are consistent with the expectation from the standard model.
Measured asymmetries of O_1 and O_3 with statistical uncertainties
The measured asymmetries of O_1 and O_3, and dimensionless CEDM \ImdtG, extracted using the asymmetries in O_1 and O_3, with their uncertainties.
Results for the covariance matrix where the parameters a and b are taken from a linear fit (equation 11) to the different CP-violating samples (CEMD).
An angular analysis of the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}(\rightarrow K^{+}\pi^{-})\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay is presented. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $3.0\,{\mbox{fb}^{-1}}$ of $pp$ collision data collected at the LHCb experiment. The complete angular information from the decay is used to determine $C\!P$-averaged observables and $C\!P$ asymmetries, taking account of possible contamination from decays with the $K^{+}\pi^{-}$ system in an S-wave configuration. The angular observables and their correlations are reported in bins of $q^2$, the invariant mass squared of the dimuon system. The observables are determined both from an unbinned maximum likelihood fit and by using the principal moments of the angular distribution. In addition, by fitting for $q^2$-dependent decay amplitudes in the region $1.1<q^{2}<6.0\mathrm{\,Ge\kern -0.1em V}^{2}/c^{4}$, the zero-crossing points of several angular observables are computed. A global fit is performed to the complete set of $C\!P$-averaged observables obtained from the maximum likelihood fit. This fit indicates differences with predictions based on the Standard Model at the level of 3.4 standard deviations. These differences could be explained by contributions from physics beyond the Standard Model, or by an unexpectedly large hadronic effect that is not accounted for in the Standard Model predictions.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-asymmetric angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Optimised angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-asymmetries evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Optimised observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Zero-crossing points determined with an amplitude fit.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.1 <q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 <q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 <q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 <q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 <q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 <q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 < q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Jet substructure quantities are measured using jets groomed with the soft-drop grooming procedure in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. These observables are sensitive to a wide range of QCD phenomena. Some observables, such as the jet mass and opening angle between the two subjets which pass the soft-drop condition, can be described by a high-order (resummed) series in the strong coupling constant $\alpha_S$. Other observables, such as the momentum sharing between the two subjets, are nearly independent of $\alpha_S$. These observables can be constructed using all interacting particles or using only charged particles reconstructed in the inner tracking detectors. Track-based versions of these observables are not collinear safe, but are measured more precisely, and universal non-perturbative functions can absorb the collinear singularities. The unfolded data are directly compared with QCD calculations and hadron-level Monte Carlo simulations. The measurements are performed in different pseudorapidity regions, which are then used to extract quark and gluon jet shapes using the predicted quark and gluon fractions in each region. All of the parton shower and analytical calculations provide an excellent description of the data in most regions of phase space.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
This paper presents cross sections for the production of a W boson in association with jets, measured in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. With an integrated luminosity of $4.6 fb^{-1}$, this data set allows for an exploration of a large kinematic range, including jet production up to a transverse momentum of 1 TeV and multiplicities up to seven associated jets. The production cross sections for W bosons are measured in both the electron and muon decay channels. Differential cross sections for many observables are also presented including measurements of the jet observables such as the rapidities and the transverse momenta as well as measurements of event observables such as the scalar sums of the transverse momenta of the jets. The measurements are compared to numerous QCD predictions including next-to-leading-order perturbative calculations, resummation calculations and Monte Carlo generators.
Distribution of inclusive jet multiplicity.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in inclusive jet multiplicity in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in inclusive jet multiplicity in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in exclusive jet multiplicity in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in exclusive jet multiplicity in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
This paper presents distributions of topological observables in inclusive three- and four-jet events produced in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with a data sample collected by the CMS experiment corresponding to a luminosity of 5.1 inverse femtobarns. The distributions are corrected for detector effects, and compared with several event generators based on two- and multi-parton matrix elements at leading order. Among the considered calculations, MADGRAPH interfaced with PYTHIA6 displays the best overall agreement with data.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THREE-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
This paper presents a measurement of the $W$ boson production cross section and the $W^{+}/W^{-}$ cross-section ratio, both in association with jets, in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurement is performed in final states containing one electron and missing transverse momentum using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.2 fb$^{-1}$. Differential cross sections for events with one or two jets are presented for a range of observables, including jet transverse momenta and rapidities, the scalar sum of transverse momenta of the visible particles and the missing transverse momentum in the event, and the transverse momentum of the $W$ boson. For a subset of the observables, the differential cross sections of positively and negatively charged $W$ bosons are measured separately. In the cross-section ratio of $W^{+}/W^{-}$ the dominant systematic uncertainties cancel out, improving the measurement precision by up to a factor of nine. The observables and ratios selected for this paper provide valuable input for the up quark, down quark, and gluon parton distribution functions of the proton.
Cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
List of experimentally considered systematic uncertainties for the W+jets cross section measurement
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
The mass of the top quark is measured in 36.3 fb$^{-1}$ of LHC proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The measurement uses a sample of top quark pair candidate events containing one isolated electron or muon and at least four jets in the final state. For each event, the mass is reconstructed from a kinematic fit of the decay products to a top quark pair hypothesis. A profile likelihood method is applied using up to four observables to extract the top quark mass. The top quark mass is measured to be 171.77 $\pm$ 0.37 GeV. This approach significantly improves the precision over previous measurements.
Fit values for the top quark mass value and the nuisance parameters corresponding to the different uncertainty sources. All nuisance parameters have a prefit uncertainty of 1.
Covariance matrix for the top quark mass value and the nuisance parameters corresponding to the different uncertainty sources. All nuisance parameters have a prefit uncertainty of 1. The (statistical) uncertainty in mTop in the matrix includes the contributions from limited simulation sample sizes.
Event-shape observables measured using charged particles in inclusive $Z$-boson events are presented, using the electron and muon decay modes of the $Z$ bosons. The measurements are based on an integrated luminosity of $1.1 {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV. Charged-particle distributions, excluding the lepton--antilepton pair from the $Z$-boson decay, are measured in different ranges of transverse momentum of the $Z$ boson. Distributions include multiplicity, scalar sum of transverse momenta, beam thrust, transverse thrust, spherocity, and $\mathcal{F}$-parameter, which are in particular sensitive to properties of the underlying event at small values of the $Z$-boson transverse momentum. The Sherpa event generator shows larger deviations from the measured observables than Pythia8 and Herwig7. Typically, all three Monte Carlo generators provide predictions that are in better agreement with the data at high $Z$-boson transverse momenta than at low $Z$-boson transverse momenta and for the observables that are less sensitive to the number of charged particles in the event.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections for the Higgs boson production in the H → ZZ → 4ℓ (ℓ = e, μ) decay channel are presented. The results are obtained from the analysis of proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{−1}$. The measured inclusive fiducial cross section is 2.73 ± 0.26 fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of 2.86 ± 0.1 fb. Differential cross sections are measured as a function of several kinematic observables sensitive to the Higgs boson production and decay to four leptons. A set of double-differential measurements is also performed, yielding a comprehensive characterization of the four leptons final state. Constraints on the Higgs boson trilinear coupling and on the bottom and charm quark coupling modifiers are derived from its transverse momentum distribution. All results are consistent with theoretical predictions from the standard model.
Differential cross section measurements in bins of mass4l (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of mass4l_zzfloating (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of njets_pt30_eta4p7 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pT4l (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of rapidity4l (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta1 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta1 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta1 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta2 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta2 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costheta2 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi1 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi1 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of phi1 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costhetastar (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costhetastar (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of costhetastar (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ1 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ1 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ1 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ2 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ2 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ2 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pTj1 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pTHj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of mHj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pTj2 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of mjj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of absdetajj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of dphijj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pTHjj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TCjmax (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TBjmax (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0m (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0m (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0m (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dcp (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dcp (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dcp (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0hp (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0hp (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of D0hp (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dint (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dint (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of Dint (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1 (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1 (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1Zg (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1Zg (v4 (2e2mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of DL1Zg (v4 (4e+4mu))
Differential cross section measurements in bins of rapidity4l_pT4l (v3, bin 0)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of rapidity4l_pT4l (v3, bin 1)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of rapidity4l_pT4l (v3, bin 2)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of njets_pt30_eta4p7_pT4l (v3, bin 0)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of njets_pt30_eta4p7_pT4l (v3, bin 1)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of njets_pt30_eta4p7_pT4l (v3, bin 2)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pTj1_pTj2 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of pT4l_pTHj (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of massZ1_massZ2 (v3)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TCjmax_pT4l (v3, bin 0)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TCjmax_pT4l (v3, bin 1)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TCjmax_pT4l (v3, bin 2)
Differential cross section measurements in bins of TCjmax_pT4l (v3, bin 3)
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of absdetajj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of TBjmax in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of massZ1 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of D0m in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of DL1 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of mass4l in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pT4l in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of phi in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pTHj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pTj1 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of mHj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pTHjj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of DL1Zg in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of njets.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pTj2 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of TCjmax in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of rapidity4l in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costheta2 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of Dint in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of Dcp in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of phi1 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costhetastar in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of D0hp in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of mjj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of massZ2 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costheta1 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of dphijj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of massZ1 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of Dint in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of DL1 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of D0m in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of massZ2 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of DL1Zg in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of Dcp in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of D0hp in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of phi in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costheta2 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of phi1 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costheta1 in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of costhetastar in v4.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of njets vs pt.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of rapidity4l vs pT4l in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pTj1 vs pTj2 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pT4l vs pTHj in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of massZ1 vs massZ2 in v3.
Correlations of higgs fiducial cross section in bins of TCjmax vs pT4l in v3.
A measurement of inclusive four-jet production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13\TeV is presented. The transverse momenta of jets within $\lvert\eta\rvert \lt$ 4.7 reach down to 35, 30, 25, and 20 GeV for the first-, second-, third-, and fourth-leading jet, respectively. Differential cross sections are measured as functions of the jet transverse momentum, jet pseudorapidity, and several other observables that describe the angular correlations between the jets. The measured distributions show sensitivity to different aspects of the underlying event, parton shower, and matrix element calculations. In particular, the interplay between angular correlations caused by parton shower and double-parton scattering contributions is shown to be important. The double-parton scattering contribution is extracted by means of a template fit to the data, using distributions for single-parton scattering obtained from Monte Carlo event generators and a double-parton scattering distribution constructed from inclusive single-jet events in data. The effective double-parton scattering cross section is calculated and discussed in view of previous measurements and of its dependence on the models used to describe the single-parton scattering background.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the leading jet from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the sub-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the third-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the fourth-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the leading jet from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the sub-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the third-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the fourth-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaY distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distribution from data to different PYTHIA 8 (P8), HERWIG ++ (H++), and HERWIG 7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaS distribution from data to different PYTHIA 8 (P8), HERWIG ++ (H++), and HERWIG 7 (H7) tunes. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the leading jet from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the sub-leading from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the third-leading from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++),and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the fourth-leading from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the leading jet from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the sub-leading from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the third-leading from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the fourth-leading from data with different KATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), and POWHEG(PW) models
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to differentKATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin, distribution from data to differentKATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaY and distribution from data to differentKATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to differentKATIE(KT), MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions havebeen normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaS distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations. All distributions havebeen normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the leading jet from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the sub-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the third-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the pT spectrum for the fourth-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the leading jet from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the sub-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the third-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the eta spectrum for the fourth-leading from data with different SPS+DPS KATIE( KT) and PYTHIA8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaY distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distributions from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions havebeen normalized to regions where a reduced DPS sensitivity is expected.
Comparison of the DeltaS distributions from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models. All distributions have been normalized to regions where a reduced DPS contribution is expected.
The DeltaS distribution obtained from the mixed data sample compared to predictions from the pure DPS sample in PYTHIA 8 (P8) and KATIE (KT). The distributions are normalized to unity.
The results of the template fit for the POWHEG (PW) NLO 2 -> 2 model without the hard MPI removed. As the DeltaS distribution obtained from the mixed data sample carries a statistical and systematic uncertainty, so does the total fitted sample.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the DeltaY distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to different PYTHIA8 (P8),HERWIG++ (H++), and HERWIG7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distribution from data to different PYTHIA 8 (P8), HERWIG ++ (H++), and HERWIG 7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the DeltaS distribution from data to different PYTHIA 8 (P8), HERWIG ++ (H++), and HERWIG 7 (H7) tunes.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the DeltaY distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the DeltaS distribution from data to different KATIE(KT),MADGRAPH5aMC@NLO(MG5), andPOWHEG(PW) implementations.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiSoft distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the DeltaPhiMin distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the DeltaY distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the phi_ij distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the Deltap_{T,Soft} distribution from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Comparison of the DeltaS distributions from data to different SPS+DPS KATIE (KT) and PYTHIA 8 (P8) models.
Double parton scattering is investigated in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV where the final state includes a W boson, which decays into a muon and a neutrino, and two jets. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 5 inverse femtobarns, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Observables sensitive to double parton scattering are investigated after being corrected for detector effects and selection efficiencies. The fraction of W + 2-jet events due to double parton scattering is measured to be 0.055 +/- 0.002 (stat.) +/- 0.014 (syst.). The effective cross section, sigma[eff], characterizing the effective transverse area of hard partonic interactions in collisions between protons is measured to be 20.7 +/- 0.8 (stat.) +/- 6.6 (syst.) mb.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Measurements of differential top quark pair $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ cross sections using events produced in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV containing two oppositely charged leptons are presented. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross sections are presented as functions of kinematic observables of the top quarks and their decay products, the $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ system, and the total number of jets in the event. The differential cross sections are defined both with particle-level objects in a fiducial phase space close to that of the detector acceptance and with parton-level top quarks in the full phase space. All results are compared with standard model predictions from Monte Carlo simulations with next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at matrix-element level interfaced to parton-shower simulations. Where possible, parton-level results are compared to calculations with beyond-NLO precision in QCD. Significant disagreement is observed between data and all predictions for several observables. The measurements are used to constrain the top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment in an effective field theory framework at NLO in QCD and to extract $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ and leptonic charge asymmetries.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Measurements of jet characteristics from inclusive jet production in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV are presented. The data sample was collected with the CMS detector at the LHC during 2010 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36 inverse picobarns. The mean charged hadron multiplicity, the differential and integral jet shape distributions, and two independent moments of the shape distributions are measured as functions of the jet transverse momentum for jets reconstructed with the anti-kT algorithm. The measured observables are corrected to the particle level and compared with predictions from various QCD Monte Carlo generators.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The dependence of $\langle N_\mathrm{ch} \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $1 < |y| < 2$.
The dependence of $\langle \delta R^2 \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $ 1 < |y| < 2 $.
The dependence of $\langle\delta \eta^2\rangle/\langle\delta \phi^2\rangle$ on the transverse momentum for jets with $|y| < 1$.
The measurement of the cross section for the production of a Z boson, decaying to dielectrons or dimuons, in association with at least one bottom quark jet are performed with proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC during 2016-2018. The integrated cross sections for Z + $\ge$ 1 b jet and Z + $\ge$ 2 b jets are reported for the electron, muon, and combined channels. The fiducial cross sections in the combined channel are 6.52 $\pm$ 0.04 (stat) $\pm$ 0.40 (syst) $\pm$ 0.14 (theo) pb for Z + $\ge$ 1 b jet and 0.65 $\pm$ 0.03 (stat) $\pm$ 0.07 (syst) $\pm$ 0.02 (theo) pb for Z + $\ge$ 2 b jets. The differential cross section distributions are measured as functions of various kinematic observables that are useful for precision tests of perturbative quantum chromodynamics predictions. The ratios of integrated and differential cross sections for Z + $\ge$ 2 b jets and Z + $\ge$ 1 b jet processes are also determined. The value of the integrated cross section ratio measured in the combined channel is 0.100 $\pm$ 0.005 (stat) $\pm$ 0.007 (syst) $\pm$ 0.003 (theo). All measurements are compared with predictions from various event generators.
Differential cross section distribution as a function of Z transverse momentum for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of Z transverse momentum for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum for the Z +>= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet absolute pseudorapidity for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet absolute pseudorapidity for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum for Z +>= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of azimuthal difference between Z boson and the leading b jet for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the rapidity difference between Z boson and the leading b jet for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the rapidity difference between Z boson and the leading b jet for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the angular separation between the Z boson and the leading b jet for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the angular separation between the Z boson and the leading b jet for the Z + >= 1 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet absolute pseudorapidity
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the leading b jet absolute pseudorapidity
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the subleading b jet transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the subleading b jet transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section distribution as a function of the Z boson transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section distribution as a function of the Z boson transverse momentum for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section as a function of the angular separation between two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section as a function of the angular separtion between two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section as a function of the minimum angular separation between the Z boson and two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section as a function of the minimum angular separation between the Z boson and two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section as a function of the asymmetry of the Z + >= 2 b jets system
Normalized differential cross section as a function of the asymmetry of the Z + >= 2 b jets system
Differential cross section as a function of the invariant mass of two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section as a function of the invariant mass of two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Differential cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the Z boson and two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Normalized differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of the Z boson and two b jets for the Z + >= 2 b jet events
Distributions of the cross section ratios as a function of the leading b jet transverse momentum
Distributions of the cross section ratios as a function of the leading b jet absolute pseudorapidity
The associated production of a W and a Z boson is studied in final states with multiple leptons produced in proton-proton (pp) collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV using 137 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. A measurement of the total inclusive production cross section yields $\sigma_{\text{tot}}$(pp $\to$ WZ) = 50.6 $\pm$ 0.8 (stat) $\pm$ 1.5 (syst) $\pm$ 1.1 (lumi) $\pm$ 0.5 (theo) pb. Measurements of the fiducial and differential cross sections for several key observables are also performed in all the final-state lepton flavour and charge compositions with a total of three charged leptons, which can be electrons or muons. All results are compared with theoretical predictions computed up to next-to-next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics plus next-to-leading order in electroweak theory and for various sets of parton distribution functions. The results include direct measurements of the charge asymmetry and the W and Z vector boson polarization. The first observation of longitudinally polarized W bosons in WZ production is reported. Anomalous gauge couplings are searched for, leading to new constraints on beyond-the-standard-model contributions to the WZ triple gauge coupling.
Distribution of the three leading leptons flavour in the CR-ZZ with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
Distribution of the jet multiplicity in the CR-ttZ with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
Distribution of the three leading leptons flavour in the CR-conv with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
Distribution of the three leading leptons flavour in the SR-WZ with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
Efficiency, acceptance, and proportion of events with leptonic tau decays in WZ production
WZ fiducial cross section in the four flavour exclusive and the flavour inclusive channels
WZ total cross section extrapolated from the four flavour exclusive and the flavour inclusive channels
Distribution of the total lepton charge in the SR-WZ with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
W$^{+}$Z fiducial cross section in the four flavour exclusive and the flavour inclusive channels
W$^{-}$Z fiducial cross section in the four flavour exclusive and the flavour inclusive channels
WZ charge asymmetry ratio measured on each of the four flavour exclusive and the flavour inclusive channels
Distribution of the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge in the SR-WZ with uncertainties evaluated after the W polarization fit
Distribution of the cosine of the Z polarization angle in the SR-WZ with uncertainties evaluated after the Z polarization fit
Best fits to the W and Z polarization fractions
2D confidence regions at the 68, 95, and 99% CL in the $f_O^W$-$f_{L}^W-f_R^W$ plane
2D confidence regions at the 68, 95, and 99% CL in the $f_O^Z$-$f_{L}^Z-f_R^Z$ plane
Distribution of the invariant mass of the WZ system in the SR-WZ with uncertainties evaluated after the inclusive cross section fit
Best fit values and one dimensional confidence regions in several EFT coefficients obtained from the EFT fit considering both the SM interferences and purely BSM (order $\Lambda^{-2}$ and $\Lambda^{-4}$) terms
2D confidence regions at the 68, 95, and 99% CL in the $c_{www}$-$c_{w}$ plane
2D confidence regions at the 68, 95, and 99% CL in the $c_{w}$-$c_{b}$ plane
2D confidence regions at the 68, 95, and 99% CL in the $c_{www}$-$c_{w}$ plane
Best fit values and one dimensional confidence regions in several EFT coefficients obtained from the EFT fit considering only the SM-EFT interference (order $\Lambda^{-2}$) terms
Evolution of the best fit and expected and observed 95% CI for the $c_{w}$ parameter as a function of the cutoff scale
Evolution of the best fit and expected and observed 95% CI for the $c_{b}$ parameter as a function of the cutoff scale
Evolution of the best fit and expected and observed 95% CI for the $c_{www}$ parameter as a function of the cutoff scale
Evolution of the best fit and expected and observed 95% CI for the $\tilde{c}_{www}$ parameter as a function of the cutoff scale
Evolution of the best fit and expected and observed 95% CI for the $\tilde{c}_{w}$ parameter as a function of the cutoff scale
Differential cross section with respect to the transverse momentum of the Z boson
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the $p_{T}$ of the Z boson
Response matrix for the $p_{T}$ of the Z boson obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the transverse momentum of the leading jet
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the $p_{T}$ of the leading jet
Response matrix for the $p_{T}$ of the leading jet obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the jet multiplicity
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the jet multiplicity
Response matrix for the jet multiplicity obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the invariant mass of the WZ system
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the invariant mass of the WZ system
Response matrix for the invariant mass of the WZ system obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the transverse momentum of the lepton associated to the W boson
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the $p_{T}$ of the lepton associated to the W boson
Response matrix for the $p_{T}$ of the lepton associated to the W boson obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the transverse momentum of the lepton associated to the W boson, W$^{+}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the $p_{T}$ of the lepton associated to the W boson, W$^{+}$Z only
Differential cross section with respect to the transverse momentum of the lepton associated to the W boson, W$^{-}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the $p_{T}$ of the lepton associated to the W boson, W$^{-}$Z only
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge
Response matrix for the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge, W$^{+}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge, W$^{+}$Z only
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge, W$^{-}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the W polarization angle times total lepton charge, W$^{-}$Z only
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the Z polarization angle
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the Z polarization angle
Response matrix for the cosine of the Z polarization angle obtained with POWHEG
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the Z polarization angle, W$^{+}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the Z polarization angle, W$^{+}$Z only
Differential cross section with respect to the cosine of the Z polarization angle, W$^{-}$Z only
Correlation matrix for the unfolded results obtained using NNLO bias, area con-straint, and no additional regularization for the cosine of the Z polarization angle, W$^{-}$Z only
A measurement of observables sensitive to effects of colour reconnection in top-quark pair-production events is presented using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of 13$\,$TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events are selected by requiring exactly one isolated electron and one isolated muon with opposite charge and two or three jets, where exactly two jets are required to be $b$-tagged. For the selected events, measurements are presented for the charged-particle multiplicity, the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of the charged particles, and the same scalar sum in bins of charged-particle multiplicity. These observables are unfolded to the stable-particle level, thereby correcting for migration effects due to finite detector resolution, acceptance and efficiency effects. The particle-level measurements are compared with different colour reconnection models in Monte Carlo generators. These measurements disfavour some of the colour reconnection models and provide inputs to future optimisation of the parameters in Monte Carlo generators.
Naming convention for the observables at different levels of the analysis. At the background-subtracted level the contributions of tracks from pile-up collisions and tracks from secondary vertices are subtracted. At the corrected level the tracking-efficiency correction (TEC) is applied. The observables at particle level are the analysis results.
The $\chi^2$ and NDF for measured normalised differential cross-sections obtained by comparing the different predictions with the unfolded data. Global($n_\text{ch},\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$) denotes the scenario in which the covariance matrix is built including the correlations of systematic uncertainties between the two observables $n_{\text{ch}}$ and $\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$
Normalised differential cross-section as a function of $n_\text{ch}$.
Normalised differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.
The $\chi^2$ and NDF for measured absolute differential cross-sections obtained by comparing the different predictions with the unfolded data. Global($n_\text{ch},\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$) denotes the scenario in which the covariance matrix is built including the correlations of systematic uncertainties between the two observables $n_{\text{ch}}$ and $\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $n_\text{ch}$.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.
A measurement is presented of differential cross sections for $t$-channel single top quark and antiquark production in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC. From a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, events containing one muon or electron and two or three jets are analysed. The cross section is measured as a function of the top quark transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$), rapidity, and polarisation angle, the charged lepton $p_\mathrm{T}$ and rapidity, and the $p_\mathrm{T}$ of the W boson from the top quark decay. In addition, the charge ratio is measured differentially as a function of the top quark, charged lepton, and W boson kinematic observables. The results are found to be in agreement with standard model predictions using various next-to-leading-order event generators and sets of parton distribution functions. Additionally, the spin asymmetry, sensitive to the top quark polarisation, is determined from the differential distribution of the polarisation angle at parton level to be 0.440 $\pm$ 0.070, in agreement with the standard model prediction.
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Top quark spin asymmetry at the parton level in the muon and electron channel and their combination
The spectra measurements of charged hadrons produced in the shower of a parton originating in the same hard scattering with a leptonically decaying Z boson, are reported in lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-proton (pp) collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV. Both PbPb and pp data sets are recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 1.7 nb$^{-1}$ and 320 pb$^{-1}$, respectively. Hadronic collision data with one reconstructed Z boson candidate with the transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T}$$\gt$ 30 GeV/$c$ are analyzed. The Z boson constrains the initial energy and direction of the associated parton. In heavy ion events, azimuthal angular distributions of charged hadrons with respect to the direction of a Z boson are sensitive to modifications of the in-medium parton shower and medium response. Compared to reference data from pp interactions, the results for central PbPb collisions indicate a modification of the angular correlations. The measurements of the fragmentation functions and $p_\mathrm{T}$ spectra of charged particles in Z boson events, which are sensitive to medium modifications of the parton shower longitudinal structure, are also reported. Significant modifications in central PbPb events compared to pp reference data are also found for these observables.
Distributions of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ in 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ in 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ in 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ in 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb - pp difference of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ distributions for 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb - pp difference of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ distributions for 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb - pp difference of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ distributions for 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb - pp difference of $\Delta\phi_{\mathrm{trk,Z}}$ distributions for 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of $\xi^{\mathrm{trk,Z}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Distributions of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ in 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 70-90% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 50-70% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 30-50% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
PbPb / pp ratio of p$^{\mathrm{trk}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ distributions for 0-30% centrality PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Inclusive and differential cross sections of single top quark production in association with a Z boson are measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS experiment. Events are selected based on the presence of three leptons, electrons or muons, associated with leptonic Z boson and top quark decays. The measurement yields an inclusive cross section of 87.9 $_{-7.3}^{+7.5}$ (stat) $_{-6.0}^{+7.3}$ (syst) fb for a dilepton invariant mass greater than 30 GeV, in agreement with standard model (SM) calculations and the most precise determination to date. The ratio between the cross sections for the top quark and the top antiquark production in association with a Z boson is measured as 2.37 $_{-0.42}^{+0.56}$ (stat) ${}_{-0.13}^{+0.27}$ (syst). Differential measurements at parton and particle levels are performed for the first time. Several kinematic observables are considered to study the modeling of the process. Results are compared to theoretical predictions with different assumptions on the source of the initial-state b quark and found to be in agreement, within the uncertainties. Additionally, the spin asymmetry, which is sensitive to the top quark polarization, is determined from the differential distribution of the polarization angle at parton level to be 0.54 $\pm$ 0.16 (stat) $\pm$ 0.06 (syst), in agreement with SM predictions.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Absolute differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Covariance matrix for the measurement of the differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the recoiling jet at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the recoiling jet at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle of the leptons, associated to the Z boson candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the leptons, associated to the top candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the three-lepton system at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the transverse momentum of the top candidate at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the invariant mass of the top-Z system at particle level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the spectator quark at parton level.
Normalized differential cross sections as a function of the cosine of the top polarization angle, measured in respect to the recoiling jet at particle level.
Likelihood scan of the top quark spin asymmetry.
Jet substructure observables have significantly extended the search program for physics beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider. The state-of-the-art tools have been motivated by theoretical calculations, but there has never been a direct comparison between data and calculations of jet substructure observables that are accurate beyond leading-logarithm approximation. Such observables are significant not only for probing the collinear regime of QCD that is largely unexplored at a hadron collider, but also for improving the understanding of jet substructure properties that are used in many studies at the Large Hadron Collider. This Letter documents a measurement of the first jet substructure quantity at a hadron collider to be calculated at next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm accuracy. The normalized, differential cross-section is measured as a function of log$_{10}\rho^2$, where $\rho$ is the ratio of the soft-drop mass to the ungroomed jet transverse momentum. This quantity is measured in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector. The data are unfolded to correct for detector effects and compared to precise QCD calculations and leading-logarithm particle-level Monte Carlo simulations.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
The chiral magnetic effect (CME) is predicted to occur as a consequence of a local violation of $\cal P$ and $\cal CP$ symmetries of the strong interaction amidst a strong electro-magnetic field generated in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Experimental manifestation of the CME involves a separation of positively and negatively charged hadrons along the direction of the magnetic field. Previous measurements of the CME-sensitive charge-separation observables remain inconclusive because of large background contributions. In order to better control the influence of signal and backgrounds, the STAR Collaboration performed a blind analysis of a large data sample of approximately 3.8 billion isobar collisions of $^{96}_{44}$Ru+$^{96}_{44}$Ru and $^{96}_{40}$Zr+$^{96}_{40}$Zr at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200$ GeV. Prior to the blind analysis, the CME signatures are predefined as a significant excess of the CME-sensitive observables in Ru+Ru collisions over those in Zr+Zr collisions, owing to a larger magnetic field in the former. A precision down to 0.4% is achieved, as anticipated, in the relative magnitudes of the pertinent observables between the two isobar systems. Observed differences in the multiplicity and flow harmonics at the matching centrality indicate that the magnitude of the CME background is different between the two species. No CME signature that satisfies the predefined criteria has been observed in isobar collisions in this blind analysis.
fig2_left_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_case2_zrzr_nonzeros.
fig2_left_low_isobarpaper_star_grey_data_zrzr_nonzeros.
fig2_left_low_isobarpaper_star_red_case3_zrzr_nonzeros.
fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_case2_ruru_nonzeros.
fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_data_ruru_nonzeros.
fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_case3_ruru_nonzeros.
fig2_right_isobarpaper_star_grey_data_nonzero.
fig2_right_low_isobarpaper_star_red_case3_nonzero.
fig2_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_case2_nonzero.
fig3_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_mean_multiplicity_ratio.
fig3_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_mean_multiplicity_zrzr.
fig3_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_mean_multiplicity_ruru.
fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v2_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_ratio.
fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_purple_v2_subEv_ratio.
fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_red_v2_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v2_EP_ratio.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_2_zrzr.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_2_ruru.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_zrzr.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_ruru.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_open_v2_subEv_zrzr.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_solid_v2_subEv_ruru.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_open_v2_tpcepd_zrzr.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_v2_tpcepd_ruru.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v2_EP_zrzr.
fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v2_EP_ruru.
fig4_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_4_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig4_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_zdc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v2_4_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”
fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v2_4_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”
fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_open_v2_zdc_zrzr.
fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_solid_v2_zdc_ruru.
fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_green_group-2. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_purple_group-4.
fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_yellow_group-3. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_group-1. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_green_group-2.
fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_red_group-3. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig6_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_ratio.
fig6_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_zrzr.
fig6_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_ruru.
fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_Ddelta_zrzr.
fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Ddelta_ratio.
fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Ddelta_ruru.
fig8_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Dgamma_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig8_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_Dgamma_zrzr.
fig8_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Dgamma_ruru.
fig9_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_kappa_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig9_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_kappa_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig9_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_kappa_ruru.
fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v2_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v3_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_red_v2_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v3_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v3_epd_zrzr.
fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v3_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_tpc_zrzr.
fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_tpc_ruru.
fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_open_v2_epd_zrzr.
fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_v2_epd_ruru.
fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v3_subEv_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v3_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_purple_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v3_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v3_subEv_zrzr.
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v3_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_open_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_zrzr.
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_solid_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v3_epd_zrzr.
fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v3_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_tpc_ratio.
fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_tpc_ratio.
fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.
fig11_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig11_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig11_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig11_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_subEv_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_subEv_ratio.
fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.
fig12_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_subEv_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig12_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig12_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_subEv_zrzr.
fig12_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_epd_ratio.
fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_epd_ratio.
fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.
fig13_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_epd_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig13_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_epd_ruru.
fig13_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_epd_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig13_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig14_low_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_k2_ratio.
fig14_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_k3_ratio.
fig14_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_k3_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig14_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_k3_ruru.
fig14_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_k2_zrzr.
fig14_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_k2_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_40-50.
fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_40-50.
fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_30-40.
fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_30-40.
fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_20-30.
fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_20-30.
fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_20-30.
fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_20-30.
fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_20-30.
fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_20-30.
fig15_right_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_40-50.
fig15_right_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_30-40.
fig15_right_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_30-40.
fig15_right_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_20-30.
fig15_right_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_20-30.
fig15_right_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig15_right_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig16_a_blue_zrzr.
fig16_a_red_ruru.
fig16_b.
fig17_a_blue_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig17_a_red_ruru.
fig17_b. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig18_a_blue_ruru_ZDCdg.
fig18_a_red_ruru_TPCdg.
fig18_b_blue_ruru_ZDCv2.
fig18_b_red_ruru_TPCv2.
fig18_c_blue_ruru_A. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig18_c_red_ruru_a.
fig18_d_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig18_e_blue_zrzr_ZDCdg.
fig18_e_red_zrzr_TPCdg.
fig18_f_blue_zrzr_ZDCv2.
fig18_f_red_zrzr_TPCv2.
fig18_g_blue_zrzr_A. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig18_g_red_zrzr_a. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig18_h_red_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig19_a_blue_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig19_a_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig19_b_blue_zrzr.
fig19_b_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig21_doubleratio.
fig22_doubleratio_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig22_doubleratio_zrzr.
fig22_fcme_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig22_fcme_zrzr.
fig23_ratio_v22.
fig23_ratio_v24. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig23_ratio_v2z. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig23_v22_ru.
fig23_v22_zr.
fig23_v24_ru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”
fig23_v24_zr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”
fig23_v2z_ru.
fig23_v2z_zr.
fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_0-20.
fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_20-40.
fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_40-60.
fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_60-100.
fig24_b_isobarpaper_ruru.
fig24_c_isobarpaper_ruru.
fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_0-20.
fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_20-40.
fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_40-60.
fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_60-100.
fig24_e_isobarpaper_zrzr.
fig24_f_isobarpaper_zrzr.
fig25_a_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_zrzr_0-10.
fig25_a_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_ruru_0-10.
fig25_b_isobarpaper_star_red_open_zrzr_10-30.
fig25_b_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_ruru_10-30.
fig25_c_isobarpaper_star_green_open_zrzr_30-50.
fig25_c_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_ruru_30-50.
fig25_d_isobarpaper_star_orange_open_zrzr_20-50.
fig25_d_isobarpaper_star_orange_solid_ruru_20-50.
fig25_e_isobarpaper_star_open_zrzr.
fig25_e_isobarpaper_star_solid_ruru.
fig25_f_isobarpaper_star_solid_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_1. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{EP,TPC}" Group-1
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_2. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-3
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_4. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-2
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_5. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-3
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_6. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-4
fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_7. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SP,EPD}" Group-2
fig26_isobarpaper_star_blue_R. "{/Symbol s}@^{-1}_{R_{/Symbol Y}_2}" Group-5
fig26_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_9. "{/Symbol k}_{112}" Group-1
fig26_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_10. "k_{2}" Group-2
fig26_isobarpaper_star_grey_deltagamma_by_v3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{123}/v_{3})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2
fig26_isobarpaper_star_lightgreen_k. "k_{3}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_1. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{EP,TPC}" Group-1
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_2. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-3
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_4. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_5. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-3
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_6. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-4
fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_7. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SP,EPD}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_blue_R.txt. "{/Symbol s}@^{-1}_{R_{/Symbol Y}_2}" Group-5
fig27_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_9. "{/Symbol k}_{112}" Group-1
fig27_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_10. "k_{2}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_grey_deltagamma_by_v3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{123}/v_{3})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_lightgreen_k. "k_{3}" Group-2
fig27_isobarpaper_star_purple_r_n_13. "r(m_{inv})" Group-3
fig27_isobarpaper_star_purple_r_n_14. "1/N@_{trk}^{offline}"
We report measurements of the primary charged particle pseudorapidity density and transverse momentum distributions in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, and investigate their correlation with experimental observables sensitive to the centrality of the collision. Centrality classes are defined using different event activity estimators, i.e. charged particle multiplicities measured in three disjunct pseudorapidity regions as well as the energy measured at beam rapidity (zero-degree). The procedures to determine the centrality, quantified by the number of participants ($N_{\rm part}$), or the number of nucleon-nucleon binary collisions ($N_{\rm coll}$), are described. We show that, in contrast to Pb-Pb collisions, in p-Pb collisions large multiplicity fluctuations together with the small range of participants available, generate a dynamical bias in centrality classes based on particle multiplicity. We propose to use the zero-degree energy, which we expect not to introduce a dynamical bias, as an alternative event-centrality estimator. Based on zero-degree energy centrality classes, the $N_{\rm part}$ dependence of particle production is studied. Under the assumption that the multiplicity measured in the Pb-going rapidity region scales with the number of Pb-participants, an approximate independence of the multiplicity per participating nucleon measured at mid-rapitity of the number of participating nucleons is observed. Furthermore, at high-$p_{\rm T}$ the p-Pb spectra are found to be consistent with the pp spectra scaled by $N_{\rm coll}$ for all centrality classes. Our results represent valuable input for the study of the event activity dependence of hard probes in p-Pb collision and, hence, help to establish baselines for the interpretation of the Pb-Pb data.
dNdeta CL1.
dNdeta V0M.
dNdeta V0A.
dNdeta ZNA.
QpPb CL1.
QpPb V0M.
QpPb V0A.
QpPb ZNA.
QpPb hybrid Pb-side.
QpPb hybrid mult.
Jet charge is an estimator of the electric charge of a quark, antiquark, or gluon initiating a jet. It is based on the momentum-weighted sum of the electric charges of the jet constituents. Measurements of three charge observables of the leading jet in transverse momentum pT are performed with dijet events. The analysis is carried out with data collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 inverse femtobarns. The results are presented as a function of the pT of the leading jet and compared to predictions from leading- and next-to-leading-order event generators combined with parton showers. Measured jet charge distributions, unfolded for detector effects, are reported, which expand on previous measurements of the jet charge average and standard deviation in pp collisions.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Results are presented on a search for CP violation in the production and decay of top quark-antiquark pairs in the lepton+jets channel. The search is based on data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, collected with the CMS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Possible CP violation effects are evaluated by measuring uncorrected asymmetries in observables constructed from linearly independent four-momentum vectors of the final-state particles. The dimensionless chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quark obtained from the observed asymmetries is measured to be 0.04 $\pm$ 0.10 (stat) $\pm$ 0.07 (syst), and the asymmetries exhibit no evidence for CP-violating effects, consistent with expectations from the standard model.
Measurements of normalized differential cross-sections of top-quark pair production are presented as a function of the top-quark, $t\bar{t}$ system and event-level kinematic observables in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV}. The observables have been chosen to emphasize the $t\bar{t}$ production process and to be sensitive to effects of initial- and final-state radiation, to the different parton distribution functions, and to non-resonant processes and higher-order corrections. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 20.3 fb$^{-1}$, recorded in 2012 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events are selected in the lepton+jets channel, requiring exactly one charged lepton and at least four jets with at least two of the jets tagged as originating from a $b$-quark. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations. The results are in fair agreement with the predictions over a wide kinematic range. Nevertheless, most generators predict a harder top-quark transverse momentum distribution at high values than what is observed in the data. Predictions beyond NLO accuracy improve the agreement with data at high top-quark transverse momenta. Using the current settings and parton distribution functions, the rapidity distributions are not well modelled by any generator under consideration. However, the level of agreement is improved when more recent sets of parton distribution functions are used.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
The correlations between different moments of two flow amplitudes, extracted with the recently developed asymmetric cumulants, are measured in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV recorded by the ALICE detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The magnitudes of the measured observables show a dependence on the different moments as well as on the collision centrality, indicating the presence of non-linear response in all even moments up to the eighth. Furthermore, the higher-order asymmetric cumulants show different signatures than the symmetric and lower-order asymmetric cumulants. Comparisons with state-of-the-art event generators using two different parametrizations obtained from Bayesian optimization show differences between data and simulations in many of the studied observables, indicating a need for further tuning of the models behind those event generators. These results provide new and independent constraints on the initial conditions and transport properties of the system created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
The production cross section of a top quark pair in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, was recorded by the CMS experiment during the 2016-2018 data taking of the LHC. The measurements are performed in a fiducial volume defined at the particle level. Events with an isolated, highly energetic lepton, at least three jets from the hadronization of quarks, among which at least one is b tagged, and one isolated photon are selected. The inclusive fiducial $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}\gamma$ cross section, for a photon with transverse momentum greater than 20 GeV and pseudorapidity $\lvert \eta\rvert$$\lt$ 1.4442, is measured to be 798 $\pm$ 7 (stat) $\pm$ 48 (syst) fb, in good agreement with the prediction from the standard model at next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics. The differential cross sections are also measured as a function of several kinematic observables and interpreted in the framework of the standard model effective field theory (EFT), leading to the most stringent direct limits to date on anomalous electromagnetic dipole moment interactions of the top quark and the photon.
Distribution of $p_{T}(\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m_{T}(W)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $M_{3}$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $m(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Distribution of $\Delta R(j,\gamma)$ in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$ signal region.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for electrons.
Fit result of the multijet template obtained with loosely isolated leptons and the electroweak background to the measured $m_{T}(W)$ distribution with isolated leptons in the $N_{jet}=2$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for muons.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the e channel.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton and the photon ($m(l,\gamma)$) in the $N_{jet}\geq 3$, $N_{b jet}=0$ selection for the $\mu$ channel.
Predicted and observed yields in the control regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
Predicted and observed yields in the signal regions in the $N_{jet}= 3$ and $\geq 4$ seletions using the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters.
The measured inclusive ttgamma cross section in the fiducial phase space compared to the prediction from simulation using Madgraph_aMC@NLO at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV.
Summary of the measured cross section ratios with respect to the NLO cross section prediction for signal regions binned in the electron channel, muon channel and the combined single lepton measurement.
Summary of the measured cross section ratios with respect to the NLO cross section prediction for signal regions binned in the electron channel, muon channel and the combined single lepton measurement.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $p_{T}(\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $|\eta(\gamma)|$ and the comparison to simulations.
The unfolded differential cross sections for $\Delta R(l,\gamma)$ and the comparison to simulations.
Summary of the one-dimensional intervals at 68 and 95% CL.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR3 signal region for the muon channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the electron channel.
The observed and predicted post-fit yields for the combined Run 2 data set in the SR4p signal region for the muon channel.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional profiled scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the one-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$.
Negative log-likelihood ratio values with respect to the best fit value of the two-dimensional scan for the Wilson coefficients $c_{tZ}$ and $c^{I}_{tZ}$.
The production cross section of a top quark pair in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions in the decay channel with two oppositely charged leptons (e$^\pm\mu^\mp$, e$^+$e$^-$, or $\mu^+\mu^-$). The measurement is performed using 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV during the 2016-2018 data-taking period of the CERN LHC. A fiducial phase space is defined such that photons radiated by initial-state particles, top quarks, or any of their decay products are included. An inclusive cross section of 175.2 $\pm$ 2.5 (stat) $\pm$ 6.3 (syst) fb is measured in a signal region with at least one jet coming from the hadronization of a bottom quark and exactly one photon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV. Differential cross sections are measured as functions of several kinematic observables of the photon, leptons, and jets, and compared to standard model predictions. The measurements are also interpreted in the standard model effective field theory framework, and limits are found on the relevant Wilson coefficients from these results alone and in combination with a previous CMS measurement of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\gamma$ production process using the lepton+jets final state.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is fixed to zero in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c^{I}_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the photon pT distribution from the dilepton analysis. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Negative log-likelihood difference from the best-fit value for the one-dimensional scans of the Wilson coefficient $c^{I}_{tZ}$, using the combination of photon pT distributions from the dilepton and lepton+jets analyses. The value of $c_{tZ}$ is profiled in the fit.
Characteristics of multi-particle production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV are studied as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity, $N_{ch}$. The produced particles are separated into two classes: those belonging to jets and those belonging to the underlying event. Charged particles are measured with pseudorapidity |η|<2.4 and transverse momentum $p_T$ > 0.25 GeV/c. Jets are reconstructed from charged-particles only and required to have $p_T$ > 5 GeV/c. The distributions of jet $p_T$, average $p_T$ of charged particles belonging to the underlying event or to jets, jet rates, and jet shapes are presented as functions of $N_{ch}$ and compared to the predictions of the PYTHIA and HERWIG event generators. Predictions without multi-parton interactions fail completely to describe the $N_{ch}$-dependence observed in the data. For increasing $N_{ch}$, PYTHIA systematically predicts higher jet rates and harder $p_T$ spectra than seen in the data, whereas HERWIG shows the opposite trends. At the highest multiplicity, the data–model agreement is worse for most observables, indicating the need for further tuning and/or new model ingredients.
Mean $p_T$, all charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, UE charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, in-jet charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, leading in-jet charged particle.
Mean $p_T$, charged particle jets, $p^{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 30$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.
Cross sections for the production of a Z boson in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 8 TeV are measured using a data sample collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC corresponding to 19.6 inverse femtobarns. Differential cross sections are presented as functions of up to three observables that describe the jet kinematics and the jet activity. Correlations between the azimuthal directions and the rapidities of the jets and the Z boson are studied in detail. The predictions of a number of multileg generators with leading or next-to-leading order accuracy are compared with the measurements. The comparison shows the importance of including multi-parton contributions in the matrix elements and the improvement in the predictions when next-to-leading order terms are included.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least ine jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least ine jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
Measurements of the associated production of a Z boson with at least one jet originating from a b quark in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV are presented. Differential cross sections are measured with data collected by the CMS experiment corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.8 inverse femtobarns. Z bosons are reconstructed through their decays to electrons and muons. Cross sections are measured as a function of observables characterizing the kinematics of the b jet and the Z boson. Ratios of differential cross sections for the associated production with at least one b jet to the associated production with any jet are also presented. The production of a Z boson with two b jets is investigated, and differential cross sections are measured for the dijet system. Results are compared to theoretical predictions, testing two different flavour schemes for the choice of initial-state partons.
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the leading b jet pT
Cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the leading b/inclusive (j) jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the leading b jet |eta|
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the leading b/inclusive (j) jet |eta|
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the Z boson pT
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the Z boson pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of HT
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of HT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of DeltaPhi(Zb)
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of DeltaPhi(Zb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the leading b jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the subleading b jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the Z boson pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the invari- ant mass of the b jet pair, Mbb
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the invari- ant mass of the Zbb system, MZbb
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of DeltaPhi(bb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of DeltaR(bb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of minimum DeltaR(Zb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of AZbb
fiducial cross section, for a single lepton type, for the production of Z(1b) and Z(2b) events
A search for Higgs boson pair (HH) production with one Higgs boson decaying to two bottom quarks and the other to two W bosons are presented. The search is done using proton-proton collisions data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC from 2016 to 2018. The final states considered include at least one leptonically decaying W boson. No evidence for the presence of a signal is observed and corresponding upper limits on the HH production cross section are derived. The limit on the inclusive cross section of the nonresonant HH production, assuming that the distributions of kinematic observables are as expected in the standard model (SM), is observed (expected) to be 14 (18) times the value predicted by the SM, at 95% confidence level. The limits on the cross section are also presented as functions of various Higgs boson coupling modifiers, and anomalous Higgs boson coupling scenarios. In addition, limits are set on the resonant HH production via spin-0 and spin-2 resonances within the mass range 250-900 GeV.
Searches for scalar leptoquarks pair-produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV at the Large Hadron Collider are performed by the ATLAS experiment. A data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ is used. Final states containing two electrons or two muons and two or more jets are studied, as are states with one electron or muon, missing transverse momentum and two or more jets. No statistically significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed. The observed and expected lower limits on the leptoquark mass at 95% confidence level extend up to 1.29 TeV and 1.23 TeV for first- and second-generation leptoquarks, respectively, as postulated in the minimal Buchm\"uller-R\"uckl-Wyler model, assuming a branching ratio into a charged lepton and a quark of 50%. In addition, measurements of particle-level fiducial and differential cross sections are presented for the $Z\rightarrow ee$, $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ and $t\bar{t}$ processes in several regions related to the search control regions. Predictions from a range of generators are compared with the measurements, and good agreement is seen for many of the observables. However, the predictions for the $Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$ measurements in observables sensitive to jet energies disagree with the data.
Inclusive cross-section and uncertainty from each source, for the dominant process in the each measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $ee jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on first- and second-generation leptoquark masses for different values of $\beta$.
Event yields in the dimuon channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Event yields in the dielectron channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{min}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $ee jj$ and $\mu\mu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{T}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $e\nu jj$ and $\mu\nu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
An updated analysis using about 1.5 million events recorded at $\sqrt{s} = M_Z$ with the DELPHI detector in 1994 is presented. Eighteen infrared and collinear safe event shape observables are measured as a function of the polar angle of the thrust axis. The data are compared to theoretical calculations in ${\cal O} (\alpha_s^2)$ including the event orientation. A combined fit of $\alpha_s$ and of the renormalization scale $x_{\mu}$ in $\cal O(\alpha_s^2$) yields an excellent description of the high statistics data. The weighted average from 18 observables including quark mass effects and correlations is $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1174 \pm 0.0026$. The final result, derived from the jet cone energy fraction, the observable with the smallest theoretical and experimental uncertainty, is $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1180 \pm 0.0006 (exp.) \pm 0.0013 (hadr.) \pm 0.0008 (scale) \pm 0.0007 (mass)$. Further studies include an $\alpha_s$ determination using theoretical predictions in the next-to-leading log approximation (NLLA), matched NLLA and $\cal O(\alpha_s^2$) predictions as well as theoretically motivated optimized scale setting methods. The influence of higher order contributions was also investigated by using the method of Pad\'{e} approximants. Average $\alpha_s$ values derived from the different approaches are in good agreement.
The weighted value of ALPHA-S from all the measured observables using experimentally optimized renormalization scale values and corrected for the b-mass toleading order.
The value of ALPHA-S derived from the JCEF and corrected for heavy quark mass effects. The quoted errors are respectively due to experimental error, hadronization, renormalization scale and heavy quark mass correction uncertainties.
Energy Energy Correlation EEC.
Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.
Jet Cone Energy Fraction.
1 - Thrust (1-T).
Oblateness O.
C-Parameter C.
Heavy Jet Mass.
Sum of the Jet Masses.
Difference of the Jet Masses.
Wide Jet Broadening BMAX.
Total Jet Broadening BSUM.
Differential 2-Jet Rate E0 Scheme D2(E0).
Differential 2-Jet Rate P0 Scheme D2(P0).
Differential 2-Jet Rate P Scheme D2(P).
Differential 2-Jet Rate Jade Alogrithm D2(Jad).
Differential 2-Jet Rate Durham Alogrithm D2(Dur).
Differential 2-Jet Rate Geneva Alogrithm D2(Gen).
Differential 2-Jet Rate Cambridge Alogrithm D2(Cam).
Energy Energy Correlation EEC.
Energy Energy Correlation EEC.
Energy Energy Correlation EEC.
Energy Energy Correlation EEC.
Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.
Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.
Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.
Asymmetry of the Energy Energy Correlation AEEC.
Jet Cone Energy Fraction.
Jet Cone Energy Fraction.
Jet Cone Energy Fraction.
Jet Cone Energy Fraction.
1 - Thrust (1-T).
A search for heavy long-lived charged $R$-hadrons is reported using a data sample corresponding to 3.2$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The search is based on observables related to large ionisation losses and slow propagation velocities, which are signatures of heavy charged particles travelling significantly slower than the speed of light. No significant deviations from the expected background are observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are provided on the production cross section of long-lived $R$-hadrons in the mass range from 600 GeV to 2000 GeV and gluino, bottom and top squark masses are excluded up to 1580 GeV, 805 GeV and 890 GeV, respectively.
Distributions of beta for data and simulation after a Zmumu selection. The values given for the mean and width are taken from Gaussian functions matched to data and simulation.
Data (black dots) and background estimates (red solid line) for m_beta for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The green shaded band illustrates the statistical uncertainty of the background estimate. The blue dashed lines illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection and the last bin includes all entries/masses above.
Data (black dots) and background estimates (red solid line) for m_betagamma for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The green shaded band illustrates the statistical uncertainty of the background estimate. The blue dashed lines illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection and the last bin includes all entries/masses above.
Data (bold boxes) and background estimates (colour fill) for m_beta vs. m_betagamma for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The blue thin-line boxes illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical/horizontal lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection (signal region in the top-right). Two events pass this selection.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of bottom-squark R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of top-squark R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Distribution of the truth-level beta for gluino R-hadrons in exemplary signal MC samples and muons in a Zmumu MC sample. All distributions have been normalised to one. The last bin contains the overflow of the histograms. The distributions illustrate the good discriminating power of the variables.
Distribution of the truth-level betagamma for gluino R-hadrons in exemplary signal MC samples and muons in a Zmumu MC sample. All distributions have been normalised to one. The last bin contains the overflow of the histograms. The distributions illustrate the good discriminating power of the variables.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 50 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 30 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 10 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
Observables sensitive to the anomalous production of events containing hadronic jets and missing momentum in the plane transverse to the proton beams at the Large Hadron Collider are presented. The observables are defined as a ratio of cross sections, for events containing jets and large missing transverse momentum to events containing jets and a pair of charged leptons from the decay of a $Z/\gamma^\ast$ boson. This definition minimises experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties in the measurements. This ratio is measured differentially with respect to a number of kinematic properties of the hadronic system in two phase-space regions; one inclusive single-jet region and one region sensitive to vector-boson-fusion topologies. The data are found to be in agreement with the Standard Model predictions and used to constrain a variety of theoretical models for dark-matter production, including simplified models, effective field theory models, and invisible decays of the Higgs boson. The measurements use 3.2 fb$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and are fully corrected for detector effects, meaning that the data can be used to constrain new-physics models beyond those shown in this paper.
Statistical-only correlation matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only correlation matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Systematic covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Systematic covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
The event-by-event correlations between three flow amplitudes are measured for the first time in Pb--Pb collisions, using higher-order Symmetric Cumulants. We find that different three-harmonic correlations develop during the collective evolution of the medium, when compared with correlations that exist in the initial state. These new results cannot be interpreted in terms of previous lower-order flow measurements, since contributions from two-harmonic correlations are explicitly removed in the new observables. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations provides new and independent constraints for the initial conditions and system properties of nuclear matter created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4,6)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
The fragmentation of high-energy gluons at small opening angles is largely unconstrained by present measurements. Gluon splitting to $b$-quark pairs is a unique probe into the properties of gluon fragmentation because identified $b$-tagged jets provide a proxy for the quark daughters of the initial gluon. In this study, key differential distributions related to the $g\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ process are measured using 33 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2016. Jets constructed from charged-particle tracks, clustered with the anti-$k_t$ jet algorithm with radius parameter $R = 0.2$, are used to probe angular scales below the $R=0.4$ jet radius. The observables are unfolded to particle level in order to facilitate direct comparisons with predictions from present and future simulations. Multiple significant differences are observed between the data and parton shower Monte Carlo predictions, providing input to improve these predictions of the main source of background events in analyses involving boosted Higgs bosons decaying into $b$-quarks.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta R(b,b)$, as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$ - the angle in $\eta$ and $\phi$ between the two b-tagged jets.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}/\pi$, the angle between production (gpp) and decay (gbb) planes ($\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}$).
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/dz(p_\text{T})$, as a function of $z(p_\text{T})=p_\text{T,2}/(p_\text{T,1}+p_\text{T,2})$.
Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.
The differential cross-section for the production of a $W$ boson in association with a top quark is measured for several particle-level observables. The measurements are performed using 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2015 and 2016. Differential cross-sections are measured in a fiducial phase space defined by the presence of two charged leptons and exactly one jet matched to a $b$-hadron, and are normalised with the fiducial cross-section. Results are found to be in good agreement with predictions from several Monte Carlo event generators.
Absolute cross-sections differential in E(b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(l1b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(l2b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in E(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in mT(llvvb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in E(b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(l1b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(l2b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in E(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in mT(llvvb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Measurements of differential cross-sections of top-quark pair production in fiducial phase-spaces are presented as a function of top-quark and $t\bar{t}$ system kinematic observables in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $3.2$ fb${}^{-1}$, recorded in 2015 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events with exactly one electron or muon and at least two jets in the final state are used for the measurement. Two separate selections are applied that each focus on different top-quark momentum regions, referred to as resolved and boosted topologies of the $t\bar{t}$ final state. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations by means of calculated $\chi^2$ and $p$-values.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
The measurement of charged-particle event shape variables is presented in inclusive inelastic pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The observables studied are the transverse thrust, thrust minor and transverse sphericity, each defined using the final-state charged particles' momentum components perpendicular to the beam direction. Events with at least six charged particles are selected by a minimum-bias trigger. In addition to the differential distributions, the evolution of each event shape variable as a function of the leading charged particle transverse momentum, charged particle multiplicity and summed transverse momentum is presented. Predictions from several Monte Carlo models show significant deviations from data.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Thrust for 4 ranges of leading particle PT.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Thrust for 5 lower limit values of leading particle PT.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Thrust Minor for 4 ranges of leading particle PT.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Thrust Minor for 5 lower limit values of leading particle PT.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Sphericity for 4 ranges of leading particle PT.
Normalized distributions of Tranverse Sphericity for 5 lower limit values of leading particle PT.
Mean Values of Thrust, Thrust Minor and Sphericity verses Multiplicity.
Mean Values of Thrust, Thrust Minor and Sphericity verses charged particle PT scalar sum.
A measurement of the splitting scales occuring in the $k_\mathrm{t}$ jet-clustering algorithm is presented for final states containing a $Z$ boson. The measurement is done using 20.2 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2012. The measurement is based on charged-particle track information, which is measured with excellent precision in the $p_\mathrm{T}$ region relevant for the transition between the perturbative and the non-perturbative regimes. The data distributions are corrected for detector effects, and are found to deviate from state-of-the-art predictions in various regions of the observables.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d0). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d1). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d2). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d3). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d4). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d5). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d6). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d7). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status Email Forum Twitter GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.