Showing 50 of 5894 results
Decay correlation data for π − p → K ∗ Λ at 3.9 GeV /c are analyzed to determine the amplitude structure. We emphasize combinations of observables invariant under rotations between s and t channel frames.
No description provided.
We employ data taken by the JADE and OPAL experiments for an integrated QCD study in hadronic e+e- annihilations at c.m.s. energies ranging from 35 GeV through 189 GeV. The study is based on jet-multiplicity related observables. The observables are obtained to high jet resolution scales with the JADE, Durham, Cambridge and cone jet finders, and compared with the predictions of various QCD and Monte Carlo models. The strong coupling strength, alpha_s, is determined at each energy by fits of O(alpha_s^2) calculations, as well as matched O(alpha_s^2) and NLLA predictions, to the data. Matching schemes are compared, and the dependence of the results on the choice of the renormalization scale is investigated. The combination of the results using matched predictions gives alpha_s(MZ)=0.1187+{0.0034}-{0.0019}. The strong coupling is also obtained, at lower precision, from O(alpha_s^2) fits of the c.m.s. energy evolution of some of the observables. A qualitative comparison is made between the data and a recent MLLA prediction for mean jet multiplicities.
Overall result for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from the combination of the ln R-matching results from the observables evolved using a three-loop running expression. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Weighted mean for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass determined from the energy evolutions of the mean values of the 2-jet cross sections obtained with the JADE and DURHAMschemes and the 3-jet fraction for the JADE, DURHAM and CAMBRIDGE schemes evaluted at a fixed YCUT.. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Combined results for ALPHA_S from fits of matched predicitions. The first systematic (DSYS) error is the experimental systematic, the second DSYS error isthe hadronization systematic and the third is the QCD scale error. The values of ALPHAS evolved to the Z0 mass using a three-loop evolution are also given.
Results for ALPHAS from fits of the ln R-matching predictions for the fractional 2-jet rate observable (D2), and the mean jet multiplicities (N) for the Durham and Cambridge schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the energy evolution of the mean 2-jet cross section <Y23> for the DURHAM a nd JADE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the 3-jet fractions (R3) for the JADE, DURHAM and CAMBRIDGE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
A measurement of novel event shapes quantifying the isotropy of collider events is performed in 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions with $\sqrt s=13$ TeV centre-of-mass energy recorded with the ATLAS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. These event shapes are defined as the Wasserstein distance between collider events and isotropic reference geometries. This distance is evaluated by solving optimal transport problems, using the 'Energy-Mover's Distance'. Isotropic references with cylindrical and circular symmetries are studied, to probe the symmetries of interest at hadron colliders. The novel event-shape observables defined in this way are infrared- and collinear-safe, have improved dynamic range and have greater sensitivity to isotropic radiation patterns than other event shapes. The measured event-shape variables are corrected for detector effects, and presented in inclusive bins of jet multiplicity and the scalar sum of the two leading jets' transverse momenta. The measured distributions are provided as inputs to future Monte Carlo tuning campaigns and other studies probing fundamental properties of QCD and the production of hadronic final states up to the TeV-scale.
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 1)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 2)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 3)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 4)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 5)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 6)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 7)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 8)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 9)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 10)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 11)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 12)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 13)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 14)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 15)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 16)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 17)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 18)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 19)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 20)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 21)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 22)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 23)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 24)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 25)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 26)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 27)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 28)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 29)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 30)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 31)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 32)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 33)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 34)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 35)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 36)
IRing2 covariance, complete
1-IRing128 covariance, complete
1-ICyl16 covariance, complete
The analyzing power,$A_{oono}$, and the polarization transfer observables$K_{onno}$,$K_{os''so}$
Position 'A' (see text for explanation).
Position 'A' (see text for explanation).
Position 'A' (see text for explanation).
Position 'A' (see text for explanation).
Position 'A' (see text for explanation).
Position 'B' (see text for explanation).
Position 'B' (see text for explanation).
Position 'B' (see text for explanation).
Position 'B' (see text for explanation).
Position 'B' (see text for explanation).
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
High statistics data for the reactions K ± p → K S 0 π ± p at 10 GeV/ c are analysed. The K ∗ (1 − ), K ∗ (2 + ), and K ∗ (3 − ) resonance parameters and production cross sections are calculated. The Kπ production amplitudes are determined as a function of t and the produced Kπ mass. Isoscalar natural-parity-exchange (NPE) is dominant. The t dependence of the K ± NPE amplitudes have a cross-over at t = −0.3 (GeV/ c ) 2 for both K ∗ (890) and K ∗ (1420) production, being more pronounced for the K ∗ (1420). Natural-parity-exchange interference effects are isolated. The NPE amplitudes are decomposed into pomeron-, f-, and ω-exchange contributions. S-wave Kπ production is found to be consistent with the Kπ partial-wave analyses of charge-exchange reactions.
CORRECTED FOR BACKGROUND, BREIT-WIGNER TAILS AND T-ACCEPTANCE. SYSTEMATIC ERROR INCLUDED.
DATA FOR K PI PRODUCTION AND ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS ARE IN THE PRECEDING PAPER, R. BALDI ET AL., NP B134, 365 (1978).
We present the results and the analysis of a high-statistics experiment to study A 2 and g production in the reaction π − p→K − K S 0 p at 10 GeV/ c . In each resonance region we perform a moment analysis of the data, and from the moments we determine the production amplitudes as a function of t . We find A 2 production proceeds dominantly by natural-parity (pomeron and f) exchange. We compare A 2 and diffractive K ∗ (1420) production. We find g production proceeds by π and ω exchanges; we determine the g → K K branching ratio.
No description provided.
No description provided.
We perform an amplitude analysis of 10 GeV/ c π − p → K − K S 0 p data as a function of K − K 0 mass from threshold up to 2 GeV. We find that the A 2 and g resonances are produced dominantly by natural and unnatural parity exchange, respectively, and we determine their resonance parameters. We present further evidence for the I = 1, 4 + state A 2 ∗ (1900), in particular by isolating interference effects. The structure of S-wave K − K 0 production suggests an I = 1, 0 + state just below 1300 MeV of width about 250 MeV.
CROSS SECTIONS FROM FITTING MASS SPECTRUM. THE RESONANT AMPLITUDE CONTRIBUTIONS ALSO GIVEN IN PAPER.
We compare production of the low mass K π -resonances by K + and K − beams in the non-charge-exchange reactions K ± p → K 0 s π ± p at 10 GeV/ c . High statistics data, obtained with the same apparatus, allow extraction of the K ∗ (890) and K ∗ (1420) production amplitudes corresponding to unnatural and natural parity exchange in the t -channel. The NPE-part dominates in both charge states. Its t -dependence shows a strong crossover at t ≈ −0.3 (GeV/ c ) 2 for the K ∗ (1420). For the K ∗ (890) the crossover is weaker but it occurs at the same value of t . This behaviour can be explained by pomeron, f and ω Regge exchange contributions to the NPE amplitude. The UPE amplitudes agree, both in normalisation and t -dependence, with the expectations of π and B exchange as isolated from data for the charge exchange reaction K − p → (K − π + )n.
No description provided.
Jet substructure quantities are measured using jets groomed with the soft-drop grooming procedure in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. These observables are sensitive to a wide range of QCD phenomena. Some observables, such as the jet mass and opening angle between the two subjets which pass the soft-drop condition, can be described by a high-order (resummed) series in the strong coupling constant $\alpha_S$. Other observables, such as the momentum sharing between the two subjets, are nearly independent of $\alpha_S$. These observables can be constructed using all interacting particles or using only charged particles reconstructed in the inner tracking detectors. Track-based versions of these observables are not collinear safe, but are measured more precisely, and universal non-perturbative functions can absorb the collinear singularities. The unfolded data are directly compared with QCD calculations and hadron-level Monte Carlo simulations. The measurements are performed in different pseudorapidity regions, which are then used to extract quark and gluon jet shapes using the predicted quark and gluon fractions in each region. All of the parton shower and analytical calculations provide an excellent description of the data in most regions of phase space.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
A polarized proton beam extracted from SATURNE II and the Saclay polarized proton target were used to measure the rescattering observables$K_{onno}$and
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
The strong coupling constant, αs, has been determined in hadronic decays of theZ0 resonance, using measurements of seven observables relating to global event shapes, energy correlatio
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.. YCUT is the cut off value used to define the jets in this case using the 'Durham' scheme.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.. YCUT is the cut off value used to define the jets in this case using the 'Durham' scheme.. D2 is the differential jet rate.
An experimental investigation of the structure of identified quark and gluon jets is presented. Observables related to both the global and internal structure of jets are measured; this allows for test
The measured jet broadening distributions (B) in quark and gluon jets seperately.
Measured distributions of -LN(Y2), where Y2 is the differential one-subjet rate, that is the value of the subjet scale parameter where 2 jets appear from the single jet.
The mean subjet multiplicity (-1) for gluon jets and quark jets for different values of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The standard deviation (DISPERSION) of the subject multiplicity for gluon jets and quark jets for different values of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The ratio of the multiplicities and their standard deviations for the subject in quark and gluon jets as a function of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The measured fragmentation function for charged particles within quark and gluon jets.
This paper presents cross sections for the production of a W boson in association with jets, measured in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. With an integrated luminosity of $4.6 fb^{-1}$, this data set allows for an exploration of a large kinematic range, including jet production up to a transverse momentum of 1 TeV and multiplicities up to seven associated jets. The production cross sections for W bosons are measured in both the electron and muon decay channels. Differential cross sections for many observables are also presented including measurements of the jet observables such as the rapidities and the transverse momenta as well as measurements of event observables such as the scalar sums of the transverse momenta of the jets. The measurements are compared to numerous QCD predictions including next-to-leading-order perturbative calculations, resummation calculations and Monte Carlo generators.
Distribution of inclusive jet multiplicity.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in inclusive jet multiplicity in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in inclusive jet multiplicity in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in exclusive jet multiplicity in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in exclusive jet multiplicity in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (leading jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (2nd jet) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (3rd jet) [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (4th jet) [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in pT (5th jet) [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in leading jet rapidity with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 2nd jet rapidity with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in HT [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DPhi(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in Dy(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in DR(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in m(jj) [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 3rd jet rapidity with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 4th jet rapidity with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in 5th jet rapidity with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least one jet in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly two jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with exactly three jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least four jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Distribution of ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the electron channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in percent in ST [GeV] with at least five jets in the event in the muon channel.Uncertainties have been symmetrised and the sign denotes the sign of the original up-variation.
An angular analysis of the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}(\rightarrow K^{+}\pi^{-})\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay is presented. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $3.0\,{\mbox{fb}^{-1}}$ of $pp$ collision data collected at the LHCb experiment. The complete angular information from the decay is used to determine $C\!P$-averaged observables and $C\!P$ asymmetries, taking account of possible contamination from decays with the $K^{+}\pi^{-}$ system in an S-wave configuration. The angular observables and their correlations are reported in bins of $q^2$, the invariant mass squared of the dimuon system. The observables are determined both from an unbinned maximum likelihood fit and by using the principal moments of the angular distribution. In addition, by fitting for $q^2$-dependent decay amplitudes in the region $1.1<q^{2}<6.0\mathrm{\,Ge\kern -0.1em V}^{2}/c^{4}$, the zero-crossing points of several angular observables are computed. A global fit is performed to the complete set of $C\!P$-averaged observables obtained from the maximum likelihood fit. This fit indicates differences with predictions based on the Standard Model at the level of 3.4 standard deviations. These differences could be explained by contributions from physics beyond the Standard Model, or by an unexpectedly large hadronic effect that is not accounted for in the Standard Model predictions.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-asymmetric angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Optimised angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-averaged angular observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
CP-asymmetries evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Optimised observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Zero-crossing points determined with an amplitude fit.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.1 <q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 <q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 <q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 <q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 <q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 <q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 < q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.
We present an angular analysis of the $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{\ast+}(\rightarrow K_{S}^{0}\pi^{+})\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay using 9$\,\mbox{fb}^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected with the LHCb experiment. For the first time, the full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured in intervals of the dimuon invariant mass squared. Local deviations from Standard Model predictions are observed, similar to those in previous LHCb analyses of the isospin-partner $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{\ast0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay. The global tension is dependent on which effective couplings are considered and on the choice of theory nuisance parameters.
Results for the CP-averaged observables Fl, Afb and S3–S9. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
Results for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.
The CP-averaged observable Fl versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S3 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S4 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S5 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable Afb versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S7 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S8 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The CP-averaged observable S9 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable Fl versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P1 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P2 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P3 versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P4' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P5' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P6' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
The optimised observable P8' versus q2. The first (second) error bars represent the statistical (total) uncertainties.
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 0.10 < q2 < 0.98 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 2.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 2.50 < q2 < 4.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 4.00 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 6.00 < q2 < 8.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 11.00 < q2 < 12.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 17.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 17.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the CP-averaged observables FL, AFB and S3–S9 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 0.10 < q2 < 0.98 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 2.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 2.50 < q2 < 4.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 4.00 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 6.00 < q2 < 8.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 11.00 < q2 < 12.50 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 17.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 17.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 1.10 < q2 < 6.00 GeV2/c4
Correlation matrix for the optimised observables FL and P1–P'8 from the maximum-likelihood fit in the interval 15.00 < q2 < 19.00 GeV2/c4
A double scattering experiment, performed at the Paul-Scherrer-Institut (PSI), has measured a large variety of spin observables for free np elastic scattering from 260 to 535 MeV in the c.m. angle ran
Measurements of DNN with statistical errors only.
Measurements of DSL with statistical errors only.
Measurements of DSS with statistical errors only.
Measurements of KNN with statistical errors only.
Measurements of KSL with statistical errors only.
Measurements of KSS with statistical errors only.
Measurements of the triple spin parameter NNLL with statistical errors only.
Measurements of the triple spin parameter NSLN with statistical errors only.
Measurements of the triple spin parameter NSNS with statistical errors only.
Measurements of the triple spin parameter NSSN with statistical errors only.
This paper presents a measurement of the $W$ boson production cross section and the $W^{+}/W^{-}$ cross-section ratio, both in association with jets, in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurement is performed in final states containing one electron and missing transverse momentum using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.2 fb$^{-1}$. Differential cross sections for events with one or two jets are presented for a range of observables, including jet transverse momenta and rapidities, the scalar sum of transverse momenta of the visible particles and the missing transverse momentum in the event, and the transverse momentum of the $W$ boson. For a subset of the observables, the differential cross sections of positively and negatively charged $W$ bosons are measured separately. In the cross-section ratio of $W^{+}/W^{-}$ the dominant systematic uncertainties cancel out, improving the measurement precision by up to a factor of nine. The observables and ratios selected for this paper provide valuable input for the up quark, down quark, and gluon parton distribution functions of the proton.
Cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
List of experimentally considered systematic uncertainties for the W+jets cross section measurement
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
Measurements are presented for several mixtures of the spin observables CSS,CSL=CLS, CLL, and CNN for neutron-proton elastic scattering. These data were obtained with a free polarized neutron beam, a polarized proton target, and a large magnetic spectrometer for the outgoing proton. The neutron beam kinetic energies were 484, 567, 634, 720, and 788 MeV. Combining these results with earlier measurements allows the determination of the pure spin observables CSS, CLS, and CLL at 484, 634, and 788 MeV for c.m. angles 25°≤θc.m.≤180° and at 720 MeV for 35°≤θc.m.≤80°. These data make a significant contribution to the knowledge of the isospin-0 nucleon-nucleon scattering amplitudes. © 1996 The American Physical Society.
Results for the pure spin observables. Statistical errors only. (Data for CSS and CNN at (172.5 to 177.5) and (167.5 to 172.5) degrees are uncertain because of the rapid angular dependence and possible errors in angle, and may be omitted from phase shift analyses.) The CNN data without errors are from a phase shift analysis of Arndt et al. (PR D45 (1992) 3395) [FA92] and were used to derive pure spin observables from the measured data.
Results for the pure spin observables. Statistical errors only. (Data for CSS and CNN at (172.5 to 177.5) and (167.5 to 172.5) degrees are uncertain because of the rapid angular dependence and possible errors in angle, and may be omitted from phase shift analyses.) The CNN data without errors are from a phase shift analysis of Arndt et al. (PR D45 (1992) 3395) [FA92] and were used to derive pure spin observables from the measured data.
Results for the pure spin observables. Statistical errors only. The CNN data without errors are from a phase shift analysis of Arndt et al. (PR D45 (1992) 3395) [FA92] and were used to derive pure spin observables from the measured data.
Results for the pure spin observables. Statistical errors only. The CNN data without errors are from a phase shift analysis of Arndt et al. (PR D45 (1992) 3395) [FA92] and were used to derive pure spin observables from the measured data.
Measured values of the mixed spin variables with the coefficients.
Measured values of the mixed spin variables with the coefficients.
Measured values of the mixed spin variables with the coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Mean values of mixed spin variables with coefficients.
Event-shape observables measured using charged particles in inclusive $Z$-boson events are presented, using the electron and muon decay modes of the $Z$ bosons. The measurements are based on an integrated luminosity of $1.1 {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV. Charged-particle distributions, excluding the lepton--antilepton pair from the $Z$-boson decay, are measured in different ranges of transverse momentum of the $Z$ boson. Distributions include multiplicity, scalar sum of transverse momenta, beam thrust, transverse thrust, spherocity, and $\mathcal{F}$-parameter, which are in particular sensitive to properties of the underlying event at small values of the $Z$-boson transverse momentum. The Sherpa event generator shows larger deviations from the measured observables than Pythia8 and Herwig7. Typically, all three Monte Carlo generators provide predictions that are in better agreement with the data at high $Z$-boson transverse momenta than at low $Z$-boson transverse momenta and for the observables that are less sensitive to the number of charged particles in the event.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
We present data of several rescattering observables measured inn p elastic scattering between 0.80 and 1.10 GeV. The SATURNE II polarized beam of free neutrons obtained from the break-up of polarized deuterons was scattered on the Saclay polarized frozen-spin proton target. Three different configurations of beam and target polarization directions were used: the observablesDonon andKonno were measured with the normal-normal spin configuration at eight energies;Nonkk,Dos″ok andKos″ko were determined with the longitudinal-longitudinal configuration at six energies;Nonsk,Dos″ok andKos″so with the sideway-longitudinal configuration at six energies. Part of the data was obtained with an unpolarized CH2 target where only the two spin-index polarization transfer parametersKos″ko andKos″so were determined. Data are compared with phase shift analyses predictions and with the LAMPF results at 0.788 GeV. Present results are the first measurements of rescattering observables above 0.80 GeV. They provide an important contribution to any future theoretical or phenomenological analysis.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
We report measurements of spin correlations and analyzing powers in He→3(p→, 2p) and He→3(p→, pn) quasielastic scattering as a function of momentum transfer and missing momentum at 197 MeV using a polarized internal target at the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility Cooler Ring. At sufficiently high momentum transfer we find He→3(p→, pn) spin observables are in good agreement with free p−n scattering observables, and therefore that He→3 can serve as a good polarized neutron target. The extracted polarizations of nucleons in He→3 at low missing momentum are consistent with Faddeev calculations.
QUASIELASTIC SCATTERING.
A measurement of jet substructure observables is presented using \ttbar events in the lepton+jets channel from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Multiple jet substructure observables are measured for jets identified as bottom, light-quark, and gluon jets, as well as for inclusive jets (no flavor information). The results are unfolded to the particle level and compared to next-to-leading-order predictions from POWHEG interfaced with the parton shower generators PYTHIA 8 and HERWIG 7, as well as from SHERPA 2 and DIRE2. A value of the strong coupling at the Z boson mass, $\alpha_S(m_\mathrm{Z}) = $ 0.115$^{+0.015}_{-0.013}$, is extracted from the substructure data at leading-order plus leading-log accuracy.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
A measurement of observables sensitive to effects of colour reconnection in top-quark pair-production events is presented using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of 13$\,$TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events are selected by requiring exactly one isolated electron and one isolated muon with opposite charge and two or three jets, where exactly two jets are required to be $b$-tagged. For the selected events, measurements are presented for the charged-particle multiplicity, the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of the charged particles, and the same scalar sum in bins of charged-particle multiplicity. These observables are unfolded to the stable-particle level, thereby correcting for migration effects due to finite detector resolution, acceptance and efficiency effects. The particle-level measurements are compared with different colour reconnection models in Monte Carlo generators. These measurements disfavour some of the colour reconnection models and provide inputs to future optimisation of the parameters in Monte Carlo generators.
Naming convention for the observables at different levels of the analysis. At the background-subtracted level the contributions of tracks from pile-up collisions and tracks from secondary vertices are subtracted. At the corrected level the tracking-efficiency correction (TEC) is applied. The observables at particle level are the analysis results.
The $\chi^2$ and NDF for measured normalised differential cross-sections obtained by comparing the different predictions with the unfolded data. Global($n_\text{ch},\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$) denotes the scenario in which the covariance matrix is built including the correlations of systematic uncertainties between the two observables $n_{\text{ch}}$ and $\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$
Normalised differential cross-section as a function of $n_\text{ch}$.
Normalised differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.
Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.
The $\chi^2$ and NDF for measured absolute differential cross-sections obtained by comparing the different predictions with the unfolded data. Global($n_\text{ch},\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$) denotes the scenario in which the covariance matrix is built including the correlations of systematic uncertainties between the two observables $n_{\text{ch}}$ and $\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $n_\text{ch}$.
Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.
Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.
We present a measurement of angular observables, $P_4'$, $P_5'$, $P_6'$, $P_8'$, in the decay $B^0 \to K^\ast(892)^0 \ell^+ \ell^-$, where $\ell^+\ell^-$ is either $e^+e^-$ or $\mu^+\mu^-$. The analysis is performed on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $711~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ containing $772\times 10^{6}$ $B\bar B$ pairs, collected at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider KEKB. Four angular observables, $P_{4,5,6,8}'$ are extracted in five bins of the invariant mass squared of the lepton system, $q^2$. We compare our results for $P_{4,5,6,8}'$ with Standard Model predictions including the $q^2$ region in which the LHCb collaboration reported the so-called $P_5'$ anomaly.
Results of the angular analysis of $B^0 \to K^\ast(892)^0 \ell^+ \ell^-$ (where $\ell = e,\mu$) in five bins of $q^2$, the di-lepton invariant mass squared.
The target asymmetry T, recoil asymmetry P, and beam-target double polarization observable H were determined in exclusive $\pi ^0$ and $\eta $ photoproduction off quasi-free protons and, for the first time, off quasi-free neutrons. The experiment was performed at the electron stretcher accelerator ELSA in Bonn, Germany, with the Crystal Barrel/TAPS detector setup, using a linearly polarized photon beam and a transversely polarized deuterated butanol target. Effects from the Fermi motion of the nucleons within deuterium were removed by a full kinematic reconstruction of the final state invariant mass. A comparison of the data obtained on the proton and on the neutron provides new insight into the isospin structure of the electromagnetic excitation of the nucleon. Earlier measurements of polarization observables in the $\gamma p \rightarrow \pi ^0 p$ and $\gamma p \rightarrow \eta p$ reactions are confirmed. The data obtained on the neutron are of particular relevance for clarifying the origin of the narrow structure in the $\eta n$ system at $W = 1.68\ \textrm{GeV}$. A comparison with recent partial wave analyses favors the interpretation of this structure as arising from interference of the $S_{11}(1535)$ and $S_{11}(1650)$ resonances within the $S_{11}$-partial wave.
Target asymmetry T, recoil asymmetry P, and polarization observable H for $\gamma p \to \pi^0 p$ as a function of the polar center-of-mass angle for bins at the given centroid c.m. energies.
Target asymmetry T, recoil asymmetry P, and polarization observable H for $\gamma n \to \pi^0 n$ as a function of the polar center-of-mass angle for bins at the given centroid c.m. energies.
Target asymmetry T, recoil asymmetry P, and polarization observable H for $\gamma p \to \eta p$ as a function of the polar center-of-mass angle for bins at the given centroid c.m. energies.
Target asymmetry T, recoil asymmetry P, and polarization observable H for $\gamma n \to \eta n$ as a function of the polar center-of-mass angle for bins at the given centroid c.m. energies.
Measurements of the top quark polarization and top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) spin correlations are presented using events containing two oppositely charged leptons (e$^+$e$^-$, e$^\pm\mu^\mp$, or $\mu^+\mu^-$) produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. A set of parton-level normalized differential cross sections, sensitive to each of the independent coefficients of the spin-dependent parts of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production density matrix, is measured for the first time at 13 TeV. The measured distributions and extracted coefficients are compared with standard model predictions from simulations at next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), and from NLO QCD calculations including electroweak corrections. All measurements are found to be consistent with the expectations of the standard model. The normalized differential cross sections are used in fits to constrain the anomalous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark to $-$0.24 $<C_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.07 TeV$^{-2}$ and $-$0.33 $< C^{I}_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.20 TeV$^{-2}$, respectively, at 95% confidence level.
We report on a measurement of the ratio of the differential cross sections for W and Z boson production as a function of transverse momentum in proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.8 TeV. This measurement uses data recorded by the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron in 1994-1995. It represents the first investigation of a proposal that ratios between W and Z observables can be calculated reliably using perturbative QCD, even when the individual observables are not. Using the ratio of differential cross sections reduces both experimental and theoretical uncertainties, and can therefore provide smaller overall uncertainties in the measured mass and width of the W boson than current methods used at hadron colliders.
The measured W and Z0 cross sections used to compute the ratio.
The measured ratios of W+-/Z0 cross sections, corrected for the branching ratios BR(W-->e-nue)=0.1073+-0.0025 and BR(Z0-->E+E-)=0.033632+-0.000059 (PDG 2000). The error given is the total error, but note that the 4.3pct error in the luminosity cancels completely in the ratio.
The strong coupling alpha_s(M_Z^2) has been measured using hadronic decays of Z^0 bosons collected by the SLD experiment at SLAC. The data were compared with QCD predictions both at fixed order, O(alpha_s^2), and including resummed analytic formulae based on the next-to-leading logarithm approximation. In this comprehensive analysis we studied event shapes, jet rates, particle correlations, and angular energy flow, and checked the consistency between alpha_s(M_Z^2) values extracted from these different measures. Combining all results we obtain alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1200 \pm 0.0025(exp.) \pm 0.0078(theor.), where the dominant uncertainty is from uncalculated higher order contributions.
Final average value of alpha_s. The second (DSYS) error is from the uncertainty on the theoretical part of the calculation.
TAU is 1-THRUST.
RHO is the normalized heavy jet mass MH**2/EVIS**2.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the E scheme.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the E0 scheme.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the P scheme.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the P0 scheme.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the D scheme.
D2 is the differential two-jet rate here as a function of ycut, the jet algorithm cut-off parameter.. Calculated in the G scheme.
No description provided.
No description provided.
JCEF is the jet cone energy fraction.
Jet substructure observables have significantly extended the search program for physics beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider. The state-of-the-art tools have been motivated by theoretical calculations, but there has never been a direct comparison between data and calculations of jet substructure observables that are accurate beyond leading-logarithm approximation. Such observables are significant not only for probing the collinear regime of QCD that is largely unexplored at a hadron collider, but also for improving the understanding of jet substructure properties that are used in many studies at the Large Hadron Collider. This Letter documents a measurement of the first jet substructure quantity at a hadron collider to be calculated at next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm accuracy. The normalized, differential cross-section is measured as a function of log$_{10}\rho^2$, where $\rho$ is the ratio of the soft-drop mass to the ungroomed jet transverse momentum. This quantity is measured in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector. The data are unfolded to correct for detector effects and compared to precise QCD calculations and leading-logarithm particle-level Monte Carlo simulations.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
This paper presents distributions of topological observables in inclusive three- and four-jet events produced in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with a data sample collected by the CMS experiment corresponding to a luminosity of 5.1 inverse femtobarns. The distributions are corrected for detector effects, and compared with several event generators based on two- and multi-parton matrix elements at leading order. Among the considered calculations, MADGRAPH interfaced with PYTHIA6 displays the best overall agreement with data.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THREE-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
Measurements of jet substructure describing the composition of quark- and gluon-initiated jets are presented. Proton-proton (pp) collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ =13 TeV collected with the CMS detector are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Generalized angularities are measured that characterize the jet substructure and distinguish quark- and gluon-initiated jets. These observables are sensitive to the distributions of transverse momenta and angular distances within a jet. The analysis is performed using a data sample of dijet events enriched in gluon-initiated jets, and, for the first time, a Z+jet event sample enriched in quark-initiated jets. The observables are measured in bins of jet transverse momentum, and as a function of the jet radius parameter. Each measurement is repeated applying a "soft drop" grooming procedure that removes soft and large angle radiation from the jet. Using these measurements, the ability of various models to describe jet substructure is assessed, showing a clear need for improvements in Monte Carlo generators.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
The correlations between different moments of two flow amplitudes, extracted with the recently developed asymmetric cumulants, are measured in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV recorded by the ALICE detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The magnitudes of the measured observables show a dependence on the different moments as well as on the collision centrality, indicating the presence of non-linear response in all even moments up to the eighth. Furthermore, the higher-order asymmetric cumulants show different signatures than the symmetric and lower-order asymmetric cumulants. Comparisons with state-of-the-art event generators using two different parametrizations obtained from Bayesian optimization show differences between data and simulations in many of the studied observables, indicating a need for further tuning of the models behind those event generators. These results provide new and independent constraints on the initial conditions and transport properties of the system created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
The spin correlation parameters$A_{oonn}, A_{ooss}, A_{oosk}, A_{ookk}$and the analyzing power$A_{oono}$have been measured i
Measurement of the analysing power. Statistical errors only are shown. For the systematic errors see the systematics section above. Note that there are two overlapping angular settings.
Measurements of the spin correlation parameter CNN. Statistical errors onlyare shown. For the systematics see the systematic section above. Note the two overlapping angular settings.
Measurements of the spin correlation parameter CLL. Statistical errors onlyare shown. For the systematics see the systematic section above. Note the two overlapping angular settings.
Measurements of the combined spin observable Cpq measured in the (x,xz) position as a linear combination of CSS, CSL and CLL (see the table above for the coefficients). The errors are purely statistical. An extra 6 PCT uncertainty has to be added to the systematic errors shown in the systematic section above.
Measurements of the combined spin observable Cpq measured in the (x,z) position as a linear combination of CSL and CLL (see the table above for the coefficients). The errors are purely statistical. An extra 6 PCT uncertainty has to be added to the systematic errors shown in the systematic section above.
A precision measurement of jet cross sections in neutral current deep-inelastic scattering for photon virtualities $5.5<Q^2<80\,{\rm GeV}^2$ and inelasticities $0.2<y<0.6$ is presented, using data taken with the H1 detector at HERA, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $290\,{\rm pb}^{-1}$. Double-differential inclusive jet, dijet and trijet cross sections are measured simultaneously and are presented as a function of jet transverse momentum observables and as a function of $Q^2$. Jet cross sections normalised to the inclusive neutral current DIS cross section in the respective $Q^2$-interval are also determined. Previous results of inclusive jet cross sections in the range $150<Q^2<15\,000\,{\rm GeV}^2$ are extended to low transverse jet momenta $5<P_{T}^{\rm jet}<7\,{\rm GeV}$. The data are compared to predictions from perturbative QCD in next-to-leading order in the strong coupling, in approximate next-to-next-to-leading order and in full next-to-next-to-leading order. Using also the recently published H1 jet data at high values of $Q^2$, the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ is determined in next-to-leading order.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.
Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.
Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.
Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).
Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).
The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.
Energy correlators that describe energy-weighted distances between two or three particles in a jet are measured using an event sample of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb$^{-1}$. The measured distributions reveal two key features of the strong interaction: confinement and asymptotic freedom. By comparing the ratio of the two measured distributions with theoretical calculations that resum collinear emissions at approximate next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy matched to a next-to-leading order calculation, the strong coupling is determined at the Z boson mass: $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ = 0.1229$^{+0.0040}_{-0.0050}$, the most precise $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ value obtained using jet substructure observables.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
The fitted slopes of the E3C/E2C data distributions as a function of jet pt are used to illustrate the dependency of alphas on jet pt.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
The chi2 scan result using eq.3 for different alphas.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The energy weight of E2C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
The energy weight of E3C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
The measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections of the Higgs boson decaying to a pair of photons are presented. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collisions data recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross section is measured to be $\sigma_\mathrm{fid}$ = 73.4 $_{-5.3}^{+5.4}$ (stat) ${}_{-2.2}^{+2.4}$ (syst) fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of 75.4 $\pm$ 4.1 fb. The measurements are also performed in fiducial regions targeting different production modes and as function of several observables describing the diphoton system, the number of additional jets present in the event, and other kinematic observables. Two double differential measurements are performed. No significant deviations from the standard model expectations are observed.
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
A polarized proton beam extracted from SATURNE II and the Saclay polarized proton target were used to determine the spin correlation parameter Aoosk and the rescattering observablesKos″ so; Dos″ok, Nos″sn, andNonsk at 1.80 and 2.10 GeV. The beam polarization was oriented perpendicular to the beam direction in the horizontal scattering plane and the target polarization was directed either along the vertical axis or longitudinally. Left-right and up-down asymmetries in the second scattering were measured. A check for the beam optimization with the beam and target polarizations oriented vertically provided other observables, of which results forDonon andKonno at 1.80, 1.85, 2.04, and 2.10 GeV are listed here. The new data at 2.10 GeV suggest a smooth energy dependence of spin triplet scattering amplitudes at fixed angles in the vicinity of this energy.
Spin correlation parameter CSL measured with the beam polarisation measuredalong the +-S direction and the target polarisation along the +-L axis. Additional 4.3 PCT systematic normalisation uncertainty.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter KSS with the beam polarisation inthe +- S direction. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter KSS with the beam polarisation inthe +- S direction. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter HSNS with the beam polarisation in the +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- N direction. Additional 7.4 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter HSNS with the beam polarisation in the +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- N direction. Additional 7.4 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter DLS with the beam polarisation inthe +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- L direction. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter DLS with the beam polarisation inthe +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- L direction. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter HSLN with the beam polarisation in the +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- L or +- N directions. Additional 7.4 PCT systematic uncertainty.
Measurement of the rescattering parameter HSLN with the beam polarisation in the +- S direction and the target polarisation in the +- L or +- N directions. Additional 7.4 PCT systematic uncertainty.
Measurement of the rescattering parameters DNN and KNN for the beam and target polarisations in the +- N directions. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameters DNN and KNN for the beam and target polarisations in the +- N directions. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameters DNN and KNN for the beam and target polarisations in the +- N directions. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
Measurement of the rescattering parameters DNN and KNN for the beam and target polarisations in the +- N directions. Additional 6.7 PCT systematic error.
We report measurements of the primary charged particle pseudorapidity density and transverse momentum distributions in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV, and investigate their correlation with experimental observables sensitive to the centrality of the collision. Centrality classes are defined using different event activity estimators, i.e. charged particle multiplicities measured in three disjunct pseudorapidity regions as well as the energy measured at beam rapidity (zero-degree). The procedures to determine the centrality, quantified by the number of participants ($N_{\rm part}$), or the number of nucleon-nucleon binary collisions ($N_{\rm coll}$), are described. We show that, in contrast to Pb-Pb collisions, in p-Pb collisions large multiplicity fluctuations together with the small range of participants available, generate a dynamical bias in centrality classes based on particle multiplicity. We propose to use the zero-degree energy, which we expect not to introduce a dynamical bias, as an alternative event-centrality estimator. Based on zero-degree energy centrality classes, the $N_{\rm part}$ dependence of particle production is studied. Under the assumption that the multiplicity measured in the Pb-going rapidity region scales with the number of Pb-participants, an approximate independence of the multiplicity per participating nucleon measured at mid-rapitity of the number of participating nucleons is observed. Furthermore, at high-$p_{\rm T}$ the p-Pb spectra are found to be consistent with the pp spectra scaled by $N_{\rm coll}$ for all centrality classes. Our results represent valuable input for the study of the event activity dependence of hard probes in p-Pb collision and, hence, help to establish baselines for the interpretation of the Pb-Pb data.
dNdeta CL1.
dNdeta V0M.
dNdeta V0A.
dNdeta ZNA.
QpPb CL1.
QpPb V0M.
QpPb V0A.
QpPb ZNA.
QpPb hybrid Pb-side.
QpPb hybrid mult.
Measurements of normalized differential cross-sections of top-quark pair production are presented as a function of the top-quark, $t\bar{t}$ system and event-level kinematic observables in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV}. The observables have been chosen to emphasize the $t\bar{t}$ production process and to be sensitive to effects of initial- and final-state radiation, to the different parton distribution functions, and to non-resonant processes and higher-order corrections. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 20.3 fb$^{-1}$, recorded in 2012 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events are selected in the lepton+jets channel, requiring exactly one charged lepton and at least four jets with at least two of the jets tagged as originating from a $b$-quark. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations. The results are in fair agreement with the predictions over a wide kinematic range. Nevertheless, most generators predict a harder top-quark transverse momentum distribution at high values than what is observed in the data. Predictions beyond NLO accuracy improve the agreement with data at high top-quark transverse momenta. Using the current settings and parton distribution functions, the rapidity distributions are not well modelled by any generator under consideration. However, the level of agreement is improved when more recent sets of parton distribution functions are used.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Results are presented from a search for CP violation in top quark pair production, using proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data used for this analysis consist of final states with two charged leptons collected by the CMS experiment, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The search uses two observables, $\mathcal{O}_1$ and $\mathcal{O}_3$, which are Lorentz scalars. The observable $\mathcal{O}_1$ is constructed from the four-momenta of the charged leptons and the reconstructed top quarks, while $\mathcal{O}_3$ consists of the four-momenta of the charged leptons and the b quarks originating from the top quarks. Asymmetries in these observables are sensitive to CP violation, and their measurement is used to determine the chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quark. The results are consistent with the expectation from the standard model.
Measured asymmetries of O_1 and O_3 with statistical uncertainties
The measured asymmetries of O_1 and O_3, and dimensionless CEDM \ImdtG, extracted using the asymmetries in O_1 and O_3, with their uncertainties.
Results for the covariance matrix where the parameters a and b are taken from a linear fit (equation 11) to the different CP-violating samples (CEMD).
Searches for scalar leptoquarks pair-produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV at the Large Hadron Collider are performed by the ATLAS experiment. A data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ is used. Final states containing two electrons or two muons and two or more jets are studied, as are states with one electron or muon, missing transverse momentum and two or more jets. No statistically significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed. The observed and expected lower limits on the leptoquark mass at 95% confidence level extend up to 1.29 TeV and 1.23 TeV for first- and second-generation leptoquarks, respectively, as postulated in the minimal Buchm\"uller-R\"uckl-Wyler model, assuming a branching ratio into a charged lepton and a quark of 50%. In addition, measurements of particle-level fiducial and differential cross sections are presented for the $Z\rightarrow ee$, $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ and $t\bar{t}$ processes in several regions related to the search control regions. Predictions from a range of generators are compared with the measurements, and good agreement is seen for many of the observables. However, the predictions for the $Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$ measurements in observables sensitive to jet energies disagree with the data.
Inclusive cross-section and uncertainty from each source, for the dominant process in the each measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $ee jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on first- and second-generation leptoquark masses for different values of $\beta$.
Event yields in the dimuon channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Event yields in the dielectron channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{min}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $ee jj$ and $\mu\mu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{T}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $e\nu jj$ and $\mu\nu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
Measurements of jet characteristics from inclusive jet production in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV are presented. The data sample was collected with the CMS detector at the LHC during 2010 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36 inverse picobarns. The mean charged hadron multiplicity, the differential and integral jet shape distributions, and two independent moments of the shape distributions are measured as functions of the jet transverse momentum for jets reconstructed with the anti-kT algorithm. The measured observables are corrected to the particle level and compared with predictions from various QCD Monte Carlo generators.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The dependence of $\langle N_\mathrm{ch} \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $1 < |y| < 2$.
The dependence of $\langle \delta R^2 \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $ 1 < |y| < 2 $.
The dependence of $\langle\delta \eta^2\rangle/\langle\delta \phi^2\rangle$ on the transverse momentum for jets with $|y| < 1$.
Spin transfer from circularly polarized real photons to recoiling hyperons has been measured for the reactions $\vec\gamma + p \to K^+ + \vec\Lambda$ and $\vec\gamma + p \to K^+ + \vec\Sigma^0$. The data were obtained using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab for center-of-mass energies $W$ between 1.6 and 2.53 GeV, and for $-0.85<\cos\theta_{K^+}^{c.m.}< +0.95$. For the $\Lambda$, the polarization transfer coefficient along the photon momentum axis, $C_z$, was found to be near unity for a wide range of energy and kaon production angles. The associated transverse polarization coefficient, $C_x$, is smaller than $C_z$ by a roughly constant difference of unity. Most significantly, the {\it total} $\Lambda$ polarization vector, including the induced polarization $P$, has magnitude consistent with unity at all measured energies and production angles when the beam is fully polarized. For the $\Sigma^0$ this simple phenomenology does not hold. All existing hadrodynamic models are in poor agreement with these results.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.032 GeV and W = 1.679 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.132 GeV and W = 1.734 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.232 GeV and W = 1.787 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.332 GeV and W = 1.839 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.433 GeV and W = 1.889 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.534 GeV and W = 1.939 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.635 GeV and W = 1.987 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.737 GeV and W = 2.035 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.838 GeV and W = 2.081 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 1.939 GeV and W = 2.126 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.039 GeV and W = 2.170 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.139 GeV and W = 2.212 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.240 GeV and W = 2.255 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.341 GeV and W = 2.296 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.443 GeV and W = 2.338 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.543 GeV and W = 2.377 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.642 GeV and W = 2.416 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA for incident energy = 2.741 GeV and W = 2.454 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.232 GeV and W = 1.787 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.332 GeV and W = 1.839 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.433 GeV and W = 1.889 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.534 GeV and W = 1.939 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.635 GeV and W = 1.987 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.737 GeV and W = 2.035 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.838 GeV and W = 2.081 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 1.939 GeV and W = 2.126 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.039 GeV and W = 2.170 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.139 GeV and W = 2.212 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.240 GeV and W = 2.255 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.341 GeV and W = 2.296 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.443 GeV and W = 2.338 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.543 GeV and W = 2.377 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.642 GeV and W = 2.416 GeV.
Coefficients Cx and Cz for the reaction GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 for incident energy = 2.741 GeV and W = 2.454 GeV.
A direct experimental reconstruction of the five complex pp elastic-scattering amplitudes has been performed at 447, 497, 517, 539, and 579 MeV. The reconstruction is done over the c.m. angles from 38° to 90° and is based on either 11 or 15 spin observables depending on the angular range. The reconstructed amplitudes are presented and compared to phase-shift analysis. A smooth energy behavior is observed for the amplitudes.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Double parton scattering is investigated in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV where the final state includes a W boson, which decays into a muon and a neutrino, and two jets. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 5 inverse femtobarns, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Observables sensitive to double parton scattering are investigated after being corrected for detector effects and selection efficiencies. The fraction of W + 2-jet events due to double parton scattering is measured to be 0.055 +/- 0.002 (stat.) +/- 0.014 (syst.). The effective cross section, sigma[eff], characterizing the effective transverse area of hard partonic interactions in collisions between protons is measured to be 20.7 +/- 0.8 (stat.) +/- 6.6 (syst.) mb.
No description provided.
No description provided.
In this paper Au+Au collisions at 11.6A GeV/c are characterized by two global observables: the energy measured near zero degrees (EZCAL) and the total event multiplicity. Particle spectra are measured for different event classes that are defined in a two-dimensional grid of both global observables. For moderately central events (σ/σint<12%) the proton dN/dy distributions do not depend on EZCAL but only on the event multiplicity. In contrast the shape of the proton transverse spectra shows little dependence on the event multiplicity. The change in the proton dN/dy distributions suggests that different conditions are formed in the collision for different event classes. These event classes are studied for signals of new physics by measuring pion and kaon spectra and yields. In the event classes doubly selected on EZCAL and multiplicity there is no indication of any unusual pion or kaon yields, spectra, or K/π ratio even in the events with extreme multiplicity.
Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy solely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).
Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS4 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS5 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS6 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS7 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS8 (see Table for event classification).
Table for event classification (from CLASS1 to CLASS8) where ZCAL energy s olely used for event selection. Number of Projectile Participants Npp=197*(1-E(P=3)/EKIN(P=1)).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS1 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS2 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
CLASS3 (see Table for event classification).
We have made, for the first time, a direct reconstruction of the pp elastic-scattering matrix at 579 MeV from a series of experiments performed at the Schweizerisches Institut für Nuklearforschung polarized-beam line. Fifteen observables consisting of the polarization, two-spin correlation and transfer parameters, and three-spin parameters were measured at seven angles between 66° and 90° (c. m.). The experimental results and reconstructed amplitudes are presented and compared to phase shift analysis.
No description provided.
VALUES OF PRECESSION ANGLE O. OBSERVABLES ARE RELATED BY THE FORMULA, (OABC) = (S'ABC)*COS(O) + (K'ABC)*SIN(O).
The fragmentation of high-energy gluons at small opening angles is largely unconstrained by present measurements. Gluon splitting to $b$-quark pairs is a unique probe into the properties of gluon fragmentation because identified $b$-tagged jets provide a proxy for the quark daughters of the initial gluon. In this study, key differential distributions related to the $g\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ process are measured using 33 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2016. Jets constructed from charged-particle tracks, clustered with the anti-$k_t$ jet algorithm with radius parameter $R = 0.2$, are used to probe angular scales below the $R=0.4$ jet radius. The observables are unfolded to particle level in order to facilitate direct comparisons with predictions from present and future simulations. Multiple significant differences are observed between the data and parton shower Monte Carlo predictions, providing input to improve these predictions of the main source of background events in analyses involving boosted Higgs bosons decaying into $b$-quarks.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta R(b,b)$, as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$ - the angle in $\eta$ and $\phi$ between the two b-tagged jets.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}/\pi$, the angle between production (gpp) and decay (gbb) planes ($\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}$).
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/dz(p_\text{T})$, as a function of $z(p_\text{T})=p_\text{T,2}/(p_\text{T,1}+p_\text{T,2})$.
Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.
A polarized proton beam from SATURNE II, the Saclay polarized targets with$^6$Li compounds, and an unpol
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on the polarized and/or unpolarized LiD and LiH targets.
The PN analysing power of polarized protons scattered on neutrons bound in carbon nuclei in the CH2 target.
The PN spin correlation parameter CNN of polarized protons scattered on polarized neutrons bound in the LiD target. The target polarization uncertainty is 4 PCT at 1.095 GeV and 10 PCT at 1.595 GeV.
The PN spin correlation parameter CNN of polarized protons scattered on polarized neutrons bound in the LiD target. The target polarization uncertainty is 4 PCT at 1.095 GeV and 10 PCT at 1.595 GeV.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The depolarization parameter DNN for quasi-elastic PN scattering of polarized protons on LiD and LiH targets. The relative systematic error provided by thenormalization uncertainty in the P-C analysing power is 6 PCT.
The event-by-event correlations between three flow amplitudes are measured for the first time in Pb--Pb collisions, using higher-order Symmetric Cumulants. We find that different three-harmonic correlations develop during the collective evolution of the medium, when compared with correlations that exist in the initial state. These new results cannot be interpreted in terms of previous lower-order flow measurements, since contributions from two-harmonic correlations are explicitly removed in the new observables. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations provides new and independent constraints for the initial conditions and system properties of nuclear matter created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4,6)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status Email Forum Twitter GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.