Showing 50 of 5049 results
The spin correlation coefficient combinations Axx + Ayy, Axx - Ayy and the analyzing powers Ay(theta) were measured for pp-->pnpi+ at beam energies of 325, 350, 375 and 400 MeV. A polarized internal atomic hydrogen target and a stored, polarized proton beam were used. These polarization observables are sensitive to contributions of higher partial waves. A comparison with recent theoretical calculations is provided.
No description provided.
A polarized internal atomic hydrogen target and a stored, polarized beam are used to measure the spin-dependent total cross section Delta_sigma_T/sigma_tot, as well as the polar integrals of the spin correlation coefficient combination A_xx-A_yy, and the analyzing power A_y for pp-> pp pi0 at four bombarding energies between 325 and 400 MeV. This experiment is made possible by the use of a cooled beam in a storage ring. The polarization observables are used to study the contribution from individual partial waves.
SIG(C=DEL_T) defined as the cross section with the spins of the colliding protons antiparallel, minus the cross section with spins parallel, using transversely polarized beam and target.
We report a measurement of the spin-dependent total cross section ratios delta_sigma_T/sigma_tot and delta_sigma_L/sigma_tot of the pp --> pp pi^0 reaction between 325 MeV and 400 MeV. The experiment was carried out with a polarized internal target in a storage ring. Non-vertical beam polarization was obtained by the use of solenoidal spin rotators. Near threshold, the knowledge of both spin-dependent total cross sections is sufficient to deduce the strength of certain participating partial waves, free of any model.
SIG(C=T1-1) and SIG(C=T11) means opposite and parallel transverse beam and target polarizations. The same is for longitudunal (L) polarizations. SIG(C=TOT)is unpolarized total cross section.
SIG(C=L1-1) and SIG(L=11) means opposite and parallel longitudinal beam andtarget polarizations. SIG(C=TOT) is unpolarized total cross section.
Jet substructure quantities are measured using jets groomed with the soft-drop grooming procedure in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. These observables are sensitive to a wide range of QCD phenomena. Some observables, such as the jet mass and opening angle between the two subjets which pass the soft-drop condition, can be described by a high-order (resummed) series in the strong coupling constant $\alpha_S$. Other observables, such as the momentum sharing between the two subjets, are nearly independent of $\alpha_S$. These observables can be constructed using all interacting particles or using only charged particles reconstructed in the inner tracking detectors. Track-based versions of these observables are not collinear safe, but are measured more precisely, and universal non-perturbative functions can absorb the collinear singularities. The unfolded data are directly compared with QCD calculations and hadron-level Monte Carlo simulations. The measurements are performed in different pseudorapidity regions, which are then used to extract quark and gluon jet shapes using the predicted quark and gluon fractions in each region. All of the parton shower and analytical calculations provide an excellent description of the data in most regions of phase space.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6c. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6d. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6e. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 6f. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7e. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 7f. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8d. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 8f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 21b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 4b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 5b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5d. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 14f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 4f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5e. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 5f. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in (300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity) and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 36-40c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 81-85c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 51-55c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 66-70c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 26-30c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 71-75c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 41-45c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 86-90c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 56-60c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 101-105c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35a. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80a. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35b. The unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80b. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 31-35c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 76-80c. The unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95a. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95b. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 46-50c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 91-95c. The unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110a. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110b. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 61-65c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from Fig 106-110c. The unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted quark-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15a. Theextracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 6c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 15c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 16c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17a. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17b. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 8c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from Fig 17c. The extracted gluon-distribution from the unfolded charged-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with 600 < $p_T$ < 800 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 99c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 100c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 101c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 102c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 103c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 104c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 105c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 106c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 107c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 108c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 109c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 110c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112a. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112b. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111c. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112c. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 113c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 114c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116a. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116b. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 115c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 116c. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 99f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 100f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 101f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 102f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 103f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 104f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 105f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 106f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 107f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 108f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 109f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 110f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more central of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112d. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 111e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112e. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 111f. The full covariance matrices for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 112f. The full covariance matrices for the charged-particle $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 113f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 114f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $z_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $z_g$ from 0.0 to 0.5.
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116d. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116e. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 115f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
Data from FigAux 116f. The full covariance matrices for the all-particle $R_g$ distribution for the more forward of the two anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$ > 300 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$. Each set of 6 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, infinity } and 6 bins in $r_g$ (0.06310, 0.10000, 0.15849, 0.25119, 0.39811, 0.63096, 0.80000).
This paper presents a measurement of the $W$ boson production cross section and the $W^{+}/W^{-}$ cross-section ratio, both in association with jets, in proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurement is performed in final states containing one electron and missing transverse momentum using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.2 fb$^{-1}$. Differential cross sections for events with one or two jets are presented for a range of observables, including jet transverse momenta and rapidities, the scalar sum of transverse momenta of the visible particles and the missing transverse momentum in the event, and the transverse momentum of the $W$ boson. For a subset of the observables, the differential cross sections of positively and negatively charged $W$ bosons are measured separately. In the cross-section ratio of $W^{+}/W^{-}$ the dominant systematic uncertainties cancel out, improving the measurement precision by up to a factor of nine. The observables and ratios selected for this paper provide valuable input for the up quark, down quark, and gluon parton distribution functions of the proton.
Cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 0.
Differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons, W<sup>-</sup> bosons and the W<sup>+</sup>/W<sup>-</sup> cross section ratio as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Statistical correlation between bins in data for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the electron η for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
List of experimentally considered systematic uncertainties for the W+jets cross section measurement
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons for different inclusive jet multiplicities.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the inclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of second leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of Δ R<sub>jet1,jet2</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of dijet invariant mass for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross section for the production of W bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
Non-perturbative corrections for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 2.
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the H<sub> T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the W p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet p<sub>T</sub> for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
NNLO/NLO k-factors determined with NNLO Njetti for the differential cross sections for the production of W<sup>+</sup> bosons and W<sup>-</sup> bosons as a function of the leading jet rapidity for events with N<sub> jets</sub> ≥ 1. These numbers were obtained with code described in Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 062002 [arXiv:1504.02131].
We employ data taken by the JADE and OPAL experiments for an integrated QCD study in hadronic e+e- annihilations at c.m.s. energies ranging from 35 GeV through 189 GeV. The study is based on jet-multiplicity related observables. The observables are obtained to high jet resolution scales with the JADE, Durham, Cambridge and cone jet finders, and compared with the predictions of various QCD and Monte Carlo models. The strong coupling strength, alpha_s, is determined at each energy by fits of O(alpha_s^2) calculations, as well as matched O(alpha_s^2) and NLLA predictions, to the data. Matching schemes are compared, and the dependence of the results on the choice of the renormalization scale is investigated. The combination of the results using matched predictions gives alpha_s(MZ)=0.1187+{0.0034}-{0.0019}. The strong coupling is also obtained, at lower precision, from O(alpha_s^2) fits of the c.m.s. energy evolution of some of the observables. A qualitative comparison is made between the data and a recent MLLA prediction for mean jet multiplicities.
Overall result for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from the combination of the ln R-matching results from the observables evolved using a three-loop running expression. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Weighted mean for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass determined from the energy evolutions of the mean values of the 2-jet cross sections obtained with the JADE and DURHAMschemes and the 3-jet fraction for the JADE, DURHAM and CAMBRIDGE schemes evaluted at a fixed YCUT.. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Combined results for ALPHA_S from fits of matched predicitions. The first systematic (DSYS) error is the experimental systematic, the second DSYS error isthe hadronization systematic and the third is the QCD scale error. The values of ALPHAS evolved to the Z0 mass using a three-loop evolution are also given.
Results for ALPHAS from fits of the ln R-matching predictions for the fractional 2-jet rate observable (D2), and the mean jet multiplicities (N) for the Durham and Cambridge schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the energy evolution of the mean 2-jet cross section <Y23> for the DURHAM a nd JADE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the 3-jet fractions (R3) for the JADE, DURHAM and CAMBRIDGE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.
A measurement of novel event shapes quantifying the isotropy of collider events is performed in 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions with $\sqrt s=13$ TeV centre-of-mass energy recorded with the ATLAS detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. These event shapes are defined as the Wasserstein distance between collider events and isotropic reference geometries. This distance is evaluated by solving optimal transport problems, using the 'Energy-Mover's Distance'. Isotropic references with cylindrical and circular symmetries are studied, to probe the symmetries of interest at hadron colliders. The novel event-shape observables defined in this way are infrared- and collinear-safe, have improved dynamic range and have greater sensitivity to isotropic radiation patterns than other event shapes. The measured event-shape variables are corrected for detector effects, and presented in inclusive bins of jet multiplicity and the scalar sum of the two leading jets' transverse momenta. The measured distributions are provided as inputs to future Monte Carlo tuning campaigns and other studies probing fundamental properties of QCD and the production of hadronic final states up to the TeV-scale.
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4
ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 1)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 2)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 3)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 4)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 5)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 6)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 7)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 8)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 9)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 10)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 11)
IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 12)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 13)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 14)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 15)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 16)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 17)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 18)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 19)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 20)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 21)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 22)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 23)
IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 24)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 25)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 26)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 27)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 28)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 29)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 30)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 31)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 32)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 33)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 34)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 35)
ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 36)
IRing2 covariance, complete
1-IRing128 covariance, complete
1-ICyl16 covariance, complete
A measurement of jet substructure observables is presented using \ttbar events in the lepton+jets channel from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Multiple jet substructure observables are measured for jets identified as bottom, light-quark, and gluon jets, as well as for inclusive jets (no flavor information). The results are unfolded to the particle level and compared to next-to-leading-order predictions from POWHEG interfaced with the parton shower generators PYTHIA 8 and HERWIG 7, as well as from SHERPA 2 and DIRE2. A value of the strong coupling at the Z boson mass, $\alpha_S(m_\mathrm{Z}) = $ 0.115$^{+0.015}_{-0.013}$, is extracted from the substructure data at leading-order plus leading-log accuracy.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.
Event-shape observables measured using charged particles in inclusive $Z$-boson events are presented, using the electron and muon decay modes of the $Z$ bosons. The measurements are based on an integrated luminosity of $1.1 {\rm fb}^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV. Charged-particle distributions, excluding the lepton--antilepton pair from the $Z$-boson decay, are measured in different ranges of transverse momentum of the $Z$ boson. Distributions include multiplicity, scalar sum of transverse momenta, beam thrust, transverse thrust, spherocity, and $\mathcal{F}$-parameter, which are in particular sensitive to properties of the underlying event at small values of the $Z$-boson transverse momentum. The Sherpa event generator shows larger deviations from the measured observables than Pythia8 and Herwig7. Typically, all three Monte Carlo generators provide predictions that are in better agreement with the data at high $Z$-boson transverse momenta than at low $Z$-boson transverse momenta and for the observables that are less sensitive to the number of charged particles in the event.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Measurements of the top quark polarization and top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) spin correlations are presented using events containing two oppositely charged leptons (e$^+$e$^-$, e$^\pm\mu^\mp$, or $\mu^+\mu^-$) produced in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. A set of parton-level normalized differential cross sections, sensitive to each of the independent coefficients of the spin-dependent parts of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production density matrix, is measured for the first time at 13 TeV. The measured distributions and extracted coefficients are compared with standard model predictions from simulations at next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), and from NLO QCD calculations including electroweak corrections. All measurements are found to be consistent with the expectations of the standard model. The normalized differential cross sections are used in fits to constrain the anomalous chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark to $-$0.24 $<C_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.07 TeV$^{-2}$ and $-$0.33 $< C^{I}_\text{tG}/\Lambda^{2}$ $<$ 0.20 TeV$^{-2}$, respectively, at 95% confidence level.
Jet substructure observables have significantly extended the search program for physics beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider. The state-of-the-art tools have been motivated by theoretical calculations, but there has never been a direct comparison between data and calculations of jet substructure observables that are accurate beyond leading-logarithm approximation. Such observables are significant not only for probing the collinear regime of QCD that is largely unexplored at a hadron collider, but also for improving the understanding of jet substructure properties that are used in many studies at the Large Hadron Collider. This Letter documents a measurement of the first jet substructure quantity at a hadron collider to be calculated at next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm accuracy. The normalized, differential cross-section is measured as a function of log$_{10}\rho^2$, where $\rho$ is the ratio of the soft-drop mass to the ungroomed jet transverse momentum. This quantity is measured in dijet events from 32.9 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector. The data are unfolded to correct for detector effects and compared to precise QCD calculations and leading-logarithm particle-level Monte Carlo simulations.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 3c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, $\sigma$(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. The uncertainties are applied symmetrically, though the cross section cannot go below zero in the first bin.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8a-16a. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for beta = 0, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 4 and Fig 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 4 and FigAux 8b-16b. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 1, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 8c-16c. The unfolded $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ distribution for anti-kt R=0.8 jets with $p_T$(lead) > 600 GeV, after the soft drop algorithm is applied for $\beta$ = 2, in data. All uncertainties described in the text are shown on the data; the uncertainties from the calculations are shown on each one. The distributions are normalized to the integrated cross section, sigma(resum), measured in the resummation region, $-3.7 < log_{10}(\rho^2) < -1.7$. Each set of 10 bins corresponds to one $p_T$ bin in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ } and 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from FigAux 6c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the combined $p_T$ and $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2. Each group of 10 bins corresponds to a bin of $p_T$ in {600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, ∞ }; each bin within the $p_T$ bin corresponds to 10 evenly spaced bins in $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ from -4.5 to -0.5.
Data from Fig 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7a. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 0, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7b. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 1, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from Fig 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
Data from FigAux 7c. The summed covariance matrices of the systematic and statistical uncertainties for the $log_{10}(\rho^2)$ bins for $\beta$ = 2, inclusive in $p_T$.
This paper presents distributions of topological observables in inclusive three- and four-jet events produced in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with a data sample collected by the CMS experiment corresponding to a luminosity of 5.1 inverse femtobarns. The distributions are corrected for detector effects, and compared with several event generators based on two- and multi-parton matrix elements at leading order. Among the considered calculations, MADGRAPH interfaced with PYTHIA6 displays the best overall agreement with data.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THREE-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE. THE PROVIDED UNCERTAINTY CORRESPONDS TO SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF SCALED ENERGY OF THE SECOND-LEADING-JET IN THE INCLUSIVE THREE-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF FOUR-JET MASS IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE BENGTSSON-ZERWAS ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
CORRECTED NORMALIZED DISTRIBUTION OF THE COSINE OF THE NACHTMANN-REITER ANGLE IN THE INCLUSIVE FOUR-JET SAMPLE.
Energy correlators that describe energy-weighted distances between two or three particles in a jet are measured using an event sample of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb$^{-1}$. The measured distributions reveal two key features of the strong interaction: confinement and asymptotic freedom. By comparing the ratio of the two measured distributions with theoretical calculations that resum collinear emissions at approximate next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy matched to a next-to-leading order calculation, the strong coupling is determined at the Z boson mass: $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ = 0.1229$^{+0.0040}_{-0.0050}$, the most precise $\alpha_\mathrm{S}(m_\mathrm{Z})$ value obtained using jet substructure observables.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to NLO+NNLL_approx predictions. Theoretial uncertainty in each bin is handled fully correlated as shape uncertainty. For the one-sided uncertainties, we symmetrize them when performing the fit.
The fitted slopes of the E3C/E2C data distributions as a function of jet pt are used to illustrate the dependency of alphas on jet pt.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
Unfolded E3C/E2C distributions in data compared to MC predictions.
The chi2 scan result using eq.3 for different alphas.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The correlation matrix is composed by 10 jet pt region, each region is represented by a block in the plot. Inside each block, there are 22 xL bins same as the E2C, E3C and E3C/E2C distributions. Therefore, the x and y bins of the correlation matrix is given by, binNumber = pT_index * 22 + xL_index.
The energy weight of E2C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
The energy weight of E3C as defined in eq.1 in the paper is used in the unfolding, the binning is listed in this table.
Measurements of normalized differential cross-sections of top-quark pair production are presented as a function of the top-quark, $t\bar{t}$ system and event-level kinematic observables in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV}. The observables have been chosen to emphasize the $t\bar{t}$ production process and to be sensitive to effects of initial- and final-state radiation, to the different parton distribution functions, and to non-resonant processes and higher-order corrections. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 20.3 fb$^{-1}$, recorded in 2012 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events are selected in the lepton+jets channel, requiring exactly one charged lepton and at least four jets with at least two of the jets tagged as originating from a $b$-quark. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations. The results are in fair agreement with the predictions over a wide kinematic range. Nevertheless, most generators predict a harder top-quark transverse momentum distribution at high values than what is observed in the data. Predictions beyond NLO accuracy improve the agreement with data at high top-quark transverse momenta. Using the current settings and parton distribution functions, the rapidity distributions are not well modelled by any generator under consideration. However, the level of agreement is improved when more recent sets of parton distribution functions are used.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t$}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the hadronic top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Fiducial phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $R_{Wt}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system invariant mass $m^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute rapidity $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark transverse momentum $p_{T}^{t}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the top-quark absolute rapidity $|y^{t}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system absolute out-of-plane momentum $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the $t\bar{t}$ system azimuthal angle $\Delta \phi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for the scalar sum of the hadronic and leptonic top-quark transverse momenta $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $y_{boost}^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space absolute differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Full phase-space relative differential cross-sections after combining the e+jets and $\mu$+jets channels for $\chi^{t\bar{t}}$. All uncertainties are quoted as a percentage with respect to the cross-section values in each bin.
Searches for scalar leptoquarks pair-produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV at the Large Hadron Collider are performed by the ATLAS experiment. A data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ is used. Final states containing two electrons or two muons and two or more jets are studied, as are states with one electron or muon, missing transverse momentum and two or more jets. No statistically significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed. The observed and expected lower limits on the leptoquark mass at 95% confidence level extend up to 1.29 TeV and 1.23 TeV for first- and second-generation leptoquarks, respectively, as postulated in the minimal Buchm\"uller-R\"uckl-Wyler model, assuming a branching ratio into a charged lepton and a quark of 50%. In addition, measurements of particle-level fiducial and differential cross sections are presented for the $Z\rightarrow ee$, $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ and $t\bar{t}$ processes in several regions related to the search control regions. Predictions from a range of generators are compared with the measurements, and good agreement is seen for many of the observables. However, the predictions for the $Z\rightarrow\ell\ell$ measurements in observables sensitive to jet energies disagree with the data.
Inclusive cross-section and uncertainty from each source, for the dominant process in the each measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of leading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of subleading $p_{T}^j$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_0,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $min\Delta\phi(j_1,l)$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\eta_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $\Delta\phi_{ll}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $m_{jj}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{ee}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $H_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $ee jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $eejj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $\mu\mu jj$ measurement region.
Differential cross-section and uncertainty from each source, as a function of $S_{T}$ for the dominant process in the extreme $e\mu jj$ measurement region.
Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on first- and second-generation leptoquark masses for different values of $\beta$.
Event yields in the dimuon channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Event yields in the dielectron channel control regions with total uncertainties. The observed number of events is given in the first row. The background event numbers as obtained from the fit are shown together with the total uncertainties. The second row shows the total background expectation, the further rows show the breakdown into different background components.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{min}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $ee jj$ and $\mu\mu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
Distribution of $m_{LQ}^{T}$ in the training region for the BDT for the $e\nu jj$ and $\mu\nu jj$ channels. Data are shown together with predicted total background expectation.
The strong coupling constant, αs, has been determined in hadronic decays of theZ0 resonance, using measurements of seven observables relating to global event shapes, energy correlatio
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.. YCUT is the cut off value used to define the jets in this case using the 'Durham' scheme.
Data corrected for finite acceptance and resolution of the detector and for intial state photon radiation. No corrections for hadronic effects are applied.. Errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties, added in quadrature.. YCUT is the cut off value used to define the jets in this case using the 'Durham' scheme.. D2 is the differential jet rate.
Double parton scattering is investigated in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV where the final state includes a W boson, which decays into a muon and a neutrino, and two jets. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 5 inverse femtobarns, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Observables sensitive to double parton scattering are investigated after being corrected for detector effects and selection efficiencies. The fraction of W + 2-jet events due to double parton scattering is measured to be 0.055 +/- 0.002 (stat.) +/- 0.014 (syst.). The effective cross section, sigma[eff], characterizing the effective transverse area of hard partonic interactions in collisions between protons is measured to be 20.7 +/- 0.8 (stat.) +/- 6.6 (syst.) mb.
No description provided.
No description provided.
A search for heavy long-lived charged $R$-hadrons is reported using a data sample corresponding to 3.2$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The search is based on observables related to large ionisation losses and slow propagation velocities, which are signatures of heavy charged particles travelling significantly slower than the speed of light. No significant deviations from the expected background are observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are provided on the production cross section of long-lived $R$-hadrons in the mass range from 600 GeV to 2000 GeV and gluino, bottom and top squark masses are excluded up to 1580 GeV, 805 GeV and 890 GeV, respectively.
Distributions of beta for data and simulation after a Zmumu selection. The values given for the mean and width are taken from Gaussian functions matched to data and simulation.
Data (black dots) and background estimates (red solid line) for m_beta for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The green shaded band illustrates the statistical uncertainty of the background estimate. The blue dashed lines illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection and the last bin includes all entries/masses above.
Data (black dots) and background estimates (red solid line) for m_betagamma for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The green shaded band illustrates the statistical uncertainty of the background estimate. The blue dashed lines illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection and the last bin includes all entries/masses above.
Data (bold boxes) and background estimates (colour fill) for m_beta vs. m_betagamma for the gluino R-hadron search (1000 GeV). The blue thin-line boxes illustrate the expected signal (on top of background) for the given R-hadron mass hypothesis. The black dashed vertical/horizontal lines at 500 GeV show the mass selection (signal region in the top-right). Two events pass this selection.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of bottom-squark R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of top-squark R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. The observed 8 TeV Run-1 limit and theory prediction [arXiv:1411.6795] are shown in dash-dotted and dotted lines, respectively.
Distribution of the truth-level beta for gluino R-hadrons in exemplary signal MC samples and muons in a Zmumu MC sample. All distributions have been normalised to one. The last bin contains the overflow of the histograms. The distributions illustrate the good discriminating power of the variables.
Distribution of the truth-level betagamma for gluino R-hadrons in exemplary signal MC samples and muons in a Zmumu MC sample. All distributions have been normalised to one. The last bin contains the overflow of the histograms. The distributions illustrate the good discriminating power of the variables.
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 50 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 30 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section as a function of mass for the production of long-lived gluino R-hadrons. The theory prediction along with its +-1sigma uncertainty is show as a black line and a blue band, respectively. For meta-stable gluinos with a lifetime of 10 ns. (mass exclusion: about 1660 GeV expected, 1520 GeV observed).
The fragmentation of high-energy gluons at small opening angles is largely unconstrained by present measurements. Gluon splitting to $b$-quark pairs is a unique probe into the properties of gluon fragmentation because identified $b$-tagged jets provide a proxy for the quark daughters of the initial gluon. In this study, key differential distributions related to the $g\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ process are measured using 33 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2016. Jets constructed from charged-particle tracks, clustered with the anti-$k_t$ jet algorithm with radius parameter $R = 0.2$, are used to probe angular scales below the $R=0.4$ jet radius. The observables are unfolded to particle level in order to facilitate direct comparisons with predictions from present and future simulations. Multiple significant differences are observed between the data and parton shower Monte Carlo predictions, providing input to improve these predictions of the main source of background events in analyses involving boosted Higgs bosons decaying into $b$-quarks.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta R(b,b)$, as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$ - the angle in $\eta$ and $\phi$ between the two b-tagged jets.
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}/\pi$, the angle between production (gpp) and decay (gbb) planes ($\Delta\theta_\text{gpp,gbb}$).
Normalisaed differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/dz(p_\text{T})$, as a function of $z(p_\text{T})=p_\text{T,2}/(p_\text{T,1}+p_\text{T,2})$.
Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.
Observables sensitive to the anomalous production of events containing hadronic jets and missing momentum in the plane transverse to the proton beams at the Large Hadron Collider are presented. The observables are defined as a ratio of cross sections, for events containing jets and large missing transverse momentum to events containing jets and a pair of charged leptons from the decay of a $Z/\gamma^\ast$ boson. This definition minimises experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties in the measurements. This ratio is measured differentially with respect to a number of kinematic properties of the hadronic system in two phase-space regions; one inclusive single-jet region and one region sensitive to vector-boson-fusion topologies. The data are found to be in agreement with the Standard Model predictions and used to constrain a variety of theoretical models for dark-matter production, including simplified models, effective field theory models, and invisible decays of the Higgs boson. The measurements use 3.2 fb$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and are fully corrected for detector effects, meaning that the data can be used to constrain new-physics models beyond those shown in this paper.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ in the VBF jet phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ in the VBF phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $M_\text{jj}$ in the VBF jet phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $M_\text{jj}$ in the VBF phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ in the VBF jet phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Measured and expected $R^\text{miss}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ in the VBF phase space. The fiducial SM predictions for the numerator and the denominator are also given.
Statistical-only correlation matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only correlation matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Statistical-only covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Systematic covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Systematic covariance matrix for all four measured distributions. <br> <br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the $\geq 1$ jet phase space. <br> Bins labelled 8-13 correspond to the $p_\text{T}^\text{miss}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 14-18 correspond to the $M_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space. <br> Bins labelled 19-24 correspond to the $\Delta\phi_\text{jj}$ distribution in the VBF phase space.
Measurements of jet characteristics from inclusive jet production in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV are presented. The data sample was collected with the CMS detector at the LHC during 2010 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36 inverse picobarns. The mean charged hadron multiplicity, the differential and integral jet shape distributions, and two independent moments of the shape distributions are measured as functions of the jet transverse momentum for jets reconstructed with the anti-kT algorithm. The measured observables are corrected to the particle level and compared with predictions from various QCD Monte Carlo generators.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.
The dependence of $\langle N_\mathrm{ch} \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $1 < |y| < 2$.
The dependence of $\langle \delta R^2 \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $ 1 < |y| < 2 $.
The dependence of $\langle\delta \eta^2\rangle/\langle\delta \phi^2\rangle$ on the transverse momentum for jets with $|y| < 1$.
The differential cross-section for the production of a $W$ boson in association with a top quark is measured for several particle-level observables. The measurements are performed using 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2015 and 2016. Differential cross-sections are measured in a fiducial phase space defined by the presence of two charged leptons and exactly one jet matched to a $b$-hadron, and are normalised with the fiducial cross-section. Results are found to be in good agreement with predictions from several Monte Carlo event generators.
Absolute cross-sections differential in E(b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(l1b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(l2b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in E(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in mT(llvvb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Absolute cross-sections differential in m(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in E(b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(l1b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(l2b). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in E(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in mT(llvvb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
Normalised cross-sections differential in m(llb). Uncertainties are signed to show correlations.
An experimental investigation of the structure of identified quark and gluon jets is presented. Observables related to both the global and internal structure of jets are measured; this allows for test
The measured jet broadening distributions (B) in quark and gluon jets seperately.
Measured distributions of -LN(Y2), where Y2 is the differential one-subjet rate, that is the value of the subjet scale parameter where 2 jets appear from the single jet.
The mean subjet multiplicity (-1) for gluon jets and quark jets for different values of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The standard deviation (DISPERSION) of the subject multiplicity for gluon jets and quark jets for different values of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The ratio of the multiplicities and their standard deviations for the subject in quark and gluon jets as a function of the subject resolution parameter Y0.
The measured fragmentation function for charged particles within quark and gluon jets.
Measurements of differential top quark pair $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ cross sections using events produced in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV containing two oppositely charged leptons are presented. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross sections are presented as functions of kinematic observables of the top quarks and their decay products, the $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ system, and the total number of jets in the event. The differential cross sections are defined both with particle-level objects in a fiducial phase space close to that of the detector acceptance and with parton-level top quarks in the full phase space. All results are compared with standard model predictions from Monte Carlo simulations with next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at matrix-element level interfaced to parton-shower simulations. Where possible, parton-level results are compared to calculations with beyond-NLO precision in QCD. Significant disagreement is observed between data and all predictions for several observables. The measurements are used to constrain the top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment in an effective field theory framework at NLO in QCD and to extract $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ and leptonic charge asymmetries.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t}$($t\bar{t}$ RF).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $y_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{t\bar{t}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|y|(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at parton level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(t,\bar{t})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{l}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{l\bar{l}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta\phi(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\Delta|\eta|(l,\bar{l})$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (leading).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $\eta_{b}$ (trailing).
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $p_{T}^{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $m_{b\bar{b}}$.
Measured absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Covariance matrix of the absolute differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Measured normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Covariance matrix of the normalised differential cross section at particle level as a function of $N_{jets}$.
Measurements of differential cross-sections of top-quark pair production in fiducial phase-spaces are presented as a function of top-quark and $t\bar{t}$ system kinematic observables in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV. The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $3.2$ fb${}^{-1}$, recorded in 2015 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events with exactly one electron or muon and at least two jets in the final state are used for the measurement. Two separate selections are applied that each focus on different top-quark momentum regions, referred to as resolved and boosted topologies of the $t\bar{t}$ final state. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations by means of calculated $\chi^2$ and $p$-values.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the tt̄ system transverse momentum in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the tt̄ system rapidity in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the mass of the tt̄ system in the resolved regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the top quark transverse momentum in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
Table of systematic uncertainties for the relative differential cross-section at particle level for the absolute value of the top quark rapidity in the boosted regime. Note that the values shown here are obtained by propagating the individual uncertainties to the measured cross-sections, while the covariance matrices are evaluated using pseudo-experiments as described in the text.
The correlations between different moments of two flow amplitudes, extracted with the recently developed asymmetric cumulants, are measured in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV recorded by the ALICE detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The magnitudes of the measured observables show a dependence on the different moments as well as on the collision centrality, indicating the presence of non-linear response in all even moments up to the eighth. Furthermore, the higher-order asymmetric cumulants show different signatures than the symmetric and lower-order asymmetric cumulants. Comparisons with state-of-the-art event generators using two different parametrizations obtained from Bayesian optimization show differences between data and simulations in many of the studied observables, indicating a need for further tuning of the models behind those event generators. These results provide new and independent constraints on the initial conditions and transport properties of the system created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,3}(2,3)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(2,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,3}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{4,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm AC}_{1,4}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{2,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{1,2}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NAC}_{3,1}(3,4)$ in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.
Multiplicity ($N_{\rm ch}$) distributions and transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T}$) spectra of inclusive primary charged particles in the kinematic range of $|\eta| < 0.8$ and 0.15 GeV/$c$$< p_{T} <$ 10 GeV/$c$ are reported for pp, p-Pb, Xe-Xe and Pb-Pb collisions at centre-of-mass energies per nucleon pair ranging from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV up to $13$ TeV. A sequential two-dimensional unfolding procedure is used to extract the correlation between the transverse momentum of primary charged particles and the charged-particle multiplicity of the corresponding collision. This correlation sharply characterises important features of the final state of a collision and, therefore, can be used as a stringent test of theoretical models. The multiplicity distributions as well as the mean and standard deviation derived from the $p_{\rm T}$ spectra are compared to state-of-the-art model predictions. Providing these fundamental observables of bulk particle production consistently across a wide range of collision energies and system sizes can serve as an important input for tuning Monte Carlo event generators.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 7.0 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 8.0 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pp collisions at 13.0 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for pPb collisions at 8.16 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 2.76 TeV.
Charged-particle multiplicity distribution for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Koba-Nielsen-Olesen scaled charged-particle multiplicity distribution for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra integrated over charged-particle multipliciy for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation over mean of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Charged-particle mean transverse momentum divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Standard deviation of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra divided by its multiplicity-integrated value as a function of relative charged-particle multiplicity for PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV.
Inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections of the Higgs boson are measured in the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ ($\ell = e,\mu$) decay channel. The results are based on proton$-$proton collision data produced at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018, equivalent to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross section for the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ process is measured to be $\sigma_\mathrm{fid} = 3.28 \pm 0.32$ fb, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $\sigma_\mathrm{fid, SM} = 3.41 \pm 0.18 $ fb. Differential fiducial cross sections are measured for a variety of observables which are sensitive to the production and decay of the Higgs boson. All measurements are in agreement with the Standard Model predictions. The results are used to constrain anomalous Higgs boson interactions with Standard Model particles.
Fractional uncertainties for the inclusive fiducial and total cross sections, and range of systematic uncertainties for the differential measurements. The columns e/$\mu$ and jets represent the experimental uncertainties in lepton and jet reconstruction and identification, respectively. The Z + jets, $t\bar{t}$, tXX (Other Bkg.) column includes uncertainties related to the estimation of these background sources. The $ZZ^{*}$ theory ($ZZ^{*}$ th.) uncertainties include the PDF and scale variations. Signal theory (Sig th.) uncertainties include PDF choice, QCD scale, and shower modelling of the signal. Finally, the column labelled Comp. contains uncertainties related to production mode composition and unfolding bias which affect the response matrices. The uncertainties have been rounded to the nearest 0.5%, except for the luminosity uncertainty which has been measured to be 1.7%.
Expected (pre-fit) and observed number of events in the four decay final states after the event selection, in the mass range 115< $m_{4l}$ < 130 GeV. The sum of the expected number of SM Higgs boson events and the estimated background yields is compared to the data. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are included for the predictions.
The fiducial and total cross sections of Higgs boson production measured in the 4l final state. The fiducial cross sections are given separately for each decay final state, and for same- and different-flavour decays. The inclusive fiducial cross section is measured as the sum of all final states ($\sigma_{sum}$), as well as by combining the per-final state measurements assuming SM $ZZ^{*} \to 4l$ relative branching ratios ($\sigma_{comb}$). For the total cross section ($\sigma_{tot}$), the Higgs boson branching ratio at $m_{H}$= 125 GeV is assumed. The total SM prediction is accurate to N3LO in QCD and NLO EW for the ggF process. The cross sections for all other Higgs boson production modes XH are added. For the fiducial cross section predictions, the SM cross sections are multiplied by the acceptances determined using the NNLOPS sample for ggF. The p-values indicating the compatibility of the measurement and the SM prediction are shown as well. They do not include the systematic uncertainty in the theoretical predictions.
Correlation matrix between the fiducial cross sections for the four individual decay final states and the $ZZ^{*}$ normalisation factor.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum $p_{T}^{4l}$ of the Higgs boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 . Measured value in the last bin is un upper limit at 95% CL.
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum $p_{T}^{4l}$ of the Higgs boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{12}$ of the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{12}$ of the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{34}$ of the subleading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass $m_{34}$ of the subleading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the rapidity $|y_{4l}|$ of the Higgs boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the rapidity $|y_{4l}|$ of the Higgs boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $|\cos\theta^{*}|$ of the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $|\cos\theta^{*}|$ of the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{1}$ of the anti-lepton from the leading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{1}$ of the anti-lepton from the leading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{2}$ of the anti-lepton from the subleading Z boson. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the production angle $\cos\theta_{2}$ of the anti-lepton from the subleading Z boson.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi_{1}$ of the decay plane of the leading Z boson and the plane formed between its four-momentum and the z-axis. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi_{1}$ of the decay plane of the leading Z boson and the plane formed between its four-momentum and the z-axis.
Differential fiducial cross section for the jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the inclusive jet multiplicity $N_{jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the number of b-quark initiated jets $N_{b-jets}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the number of b-quark initiated jets $N_{b-jets}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$ in events with at least one jet. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$ in events with at least one jet.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$ in events with at least two jets. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$ in events with at least two jets.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the two highest-pT jets $m_{jj}$ in events with at least two jets. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the two highest-pT jets $m_{jj}$ in events with at least two jets.
Differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in pseudorapidity $\Delta\eta_{jj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in pseudorapidity $\Delta\eta_{jj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in $\phi$ $\Delta\phi_{jj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the distance between the two highest-pT jets in $\phi$ $\Delta\phi_{jj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system, in events with at least one jet $p_{T}^{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system, in events with at least one jet $p_{T}^{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus di-jet system, in events with at least two jets $p_{T}^{4ljj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 . Measured value in the last bin is un upper limit at 95% CL.
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus di-jet system, in events with at least two jets $p_{T}^{4ljj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system in events with at least one jet $m_{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system in events with at least one jet $m_{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus di-jet system in events with at least two jets $m_{4ljj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the invariant mass of the four lepton plus di-jet system in events with at least two jets $m_{4ljj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $ll\mu\mu$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $llee$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass m12 vs. m34 in $ll\mu\mu$ and $llee$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $|y_{4l}|$ bins. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $|y_{4l}|$ bins.
Differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $N_{jets}$ bins. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section of the $p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution in $N_{jets}$ bins.
Differential fiducial cross section for transverse momentum of the four lepton system vs. the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for transverse momentum of the four lepton system vs. the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system vs the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$m_{4lj}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton plus jet system vs the invariant mass of the four lepton plus jet system $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$m_{4lj}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton vs the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{l.jet}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the four lepton vs the transverse momentum of the leading jet $p_{T}^{4l}$vs.$p_{T}^{lead.jet}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the rapidity of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$|y^{lead.jet}|$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the rapidity of the leading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$|y^{lead.jet}|$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the transverse momentum of the leading jet vs the transverse momentum of the subleading jet $p_{T}^{lead.jet}$vs.$p_{T}^{sublead.jet}$.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading Z boson mass $m_{12}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the subleading Z boson mass $m_{34}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $2e2\mu$ and $2\mu2e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the azimuthal angle $\phi$ of the decay planes of the two reconstructed Z bosons in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $4\mu$ and $4e$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $2\mu2e$ and $2e2\mu$ final states. The measured cross sections are compared to predictions provided by NNLOPS + XH. NNLOPS is normalised to the N3LO total cross section with a K-factor = 1.1 .
Correlation matrix between the measured cross sections and the $ZZ^{*}$ background normalization corresponding to the differential fiducial cross section for the leading vs. subleading Z boson mass $m_{12}$vs.$m_{34}$ in $4l$ and $2l2l$ final states.
A measurement of the splitting scales occuring in the $k_\mathrm{t}$ jet-clustering algorithm is presented for final states containing a $Z$ boson. The measurement is done using 20.2 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2012. The measurement is based on charged-particle track information, which is measured with excellent precision in the $p_\mathrm{T}$ region relevant for the transition between the perturbative and the non-perturbative regimes. The data distributions are corrected for detector effects, and are found to deviate from state-of-the-art predictions in various regions of the observables.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d0). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d1). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d2). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d3). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d4). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d5). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d6). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
The measured fiducial as a function of sqrt(d7). The fiducial cross sections are measred for the charged-only particle level in the muon channel as well as the electron channel. Extrapolations to the complete fiducial phase space including charged and neutral particles are also shown for the muon channel and the electron channel.
Measurements of jet substructure describing the composition of quark- and gluon-initiated jets are presented. Proton-proton (pp) collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ =13 TeV collected with the CMS detector are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Generalized angularities are measured that characterize the jet substructure and distinguish quark- and gluon-initiated jets. These observables are sensitive to the distributions of transverse momenta and angular distances within a jet. The analysis is performed using a data sample of dijet events enriched in gluon-initiated jets, and, for the first time, a Z+jet event sample enriched in quark-initiated jets. The observables are measured in bins of jet transverse momentum, and as a function of the jet radius parameter. Each measurement is repeated applying a "soft drop" grooming procedure that removes soft and large angle radiation from the jet. Using these measurements, the ability of various models to describe jet substructure is assessed, showing a clear need for improvements in Monte Carlo generators.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK4 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of ungroomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed LHA (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width (charged-only) for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed multiplicity for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed pTD2 for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed thrust for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the Z+jet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the central dijet region.
Mean of groomed width for AK8 jets as a function of PT in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 LHA (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width (charged-only) in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 multiplicity in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 pTD2 in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 thrust in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Correlation matrix of the particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the central dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 50 < PT < 65 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 65 < PT < 88 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 88 < PT < 120 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 120 < PT < 150 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 150 < PT < 186 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 186 < PT < 254 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 254 < PT < 326 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 326 < PT < 408 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 408 < PT < 481 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 481 < PT < 614 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 614 < PT < 800 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 800 < PT < 1000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
Particle-level distributions of groomed AK8 width in 1000 < PT < 4000 GeV in the forward dijet region.
A search for strongly produced supersymmetric particles is conducted using signatures involving multiple energetic jets and either two isolated leptons ($e$ or $\mu$) with the same electric charge or at least three isolated leptons. The search also utilises $b$-tagged jets, missing transverse momentum and other observables to extend its sensitivity. The analysis uses a data sample of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess over the Standard Model expectation is observed. The results are interpreted in several simplified supersymmetric models and extend the exclusion limits from previous searches. In the context of exclusive production and simplified decay modes, gluino masses are excluded at 95% confidence level up to 1.1-1.3 TeV for light neutralinos (depending on the decay channel), and bottom squark masses are also excluded up to 540 GeV. In the former scenarios, neutralino masses are also excluded up to 550-850 GeV for gluino masses around 1 TeV.
Missing transverse momentum distribution after SR0b3j selection, beside the $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ requirement. The results in the signal region correspond to the last inclusive bin. The systematic uncertainties include theory uncertainties for the backgrounds with prompt SS/3L and the full systematic uncertainties for data-driven backgrounds. For illustration the distribution for a benchmark SUSY scenario ($pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$, $\tilde g\to qq(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$, $m_{\tilde g}=1.3$ TeV, $m_{\tilde\chi_1^0}=0.5$ TeV) is also shown.
Missing transverse momentum distribution after SR0b5j selection, beside the $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ requirement. The results in the signal region correspond to the last inclusive bin. The systematic uncertainties include theory uncertainties for the backgrounds with prompt SS/3L and the full systematic uncertainties for data-driven backgrounds. For illustration the distribution for a benchmark SUSY scenario ($pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$, $\tilde g\to qqWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$, $m_{\tilde g}=1.1$ TeV, $m_{\tilde\chi_1^0}=0.4$ TeV) is also shown.
Missing transverse momentum distribution after SR1b selection, beside the $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ requirement. The results in the signal region correspond to the last inclusive bin. The systematic uncertainties include theory uncertainties for the backgrounds with prompt SS/3L and the full systematic uncertainties for data-driven backgrounds. For illustration the distribution for a benchmark SUSY scenario ($pp\to \tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$, $\tilde b_1\to tW\tilde\chi_1^0$, $m_{\tilde b_1}=600$ GeV, $m_{\tilde\chi_1^0}=50$ GeV) is also shown.
Missing transverse momentum distribution after SR3b selection, beside the $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ requirement. The results in the signal region correspond to the last inclusive bin. The systematic uncertainties include theory uncertainties for the backgrounds with prompt SS/3L and the full systematic uncertainties for data-driven backgrounds. For illustration the distribution for a benchmark SUSY scenario ($pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$, $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$, $m_{\tilde g}=1.2$ TeV, $m_{\tilde\chi_1^0}=0.7$ TeV) is also shown.
Observed exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qq(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qq(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Upper limits on signal cross-sections as function of the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qq(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$ decays, obtained using the signal efficiency and acceptance specific to each model. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qqWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qqWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Upper limits on signal cross-sections as function of the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to qqWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays, obtained using the signal efficiency and acceptance specific to each model. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on the $\tilde b_1$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde b_1\to t\tilde\chi_1^-$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on the $\tilde b_1$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde b_1\to t\tilde\chi_1^-$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Upper limits on signal cross-sections as function of the $\tilde b_1$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde b_1\to t\tilde\chi_1^-$ decays, obtained using the signal efficiency and acceptance specific to each model. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Observed exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Expected exclusion limits on the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
Upper limits on signal cross-sections as function of the $\tilde g$ and $\tilde\chi_1^0$ masses in the context of SUSY scenarios with simplified mass spectra featuring $\tilde g\tilde g$ pair production with exclusive $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$ decays, obtained using the signal efficiency and acceptance specific to each model. All limits are computed at 95% CL.
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to q\bar q(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$ decay: signal acceptance (in %) in the signal region SR0b3j. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to q\bar q(\tilde\ell\ell/\tilde\nu\nu)$ decay: reconstruction efficiency (in %) in the signal region SR0b3j. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to q\bar qWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: signal acceptance (in %) in the signal region SR0b5j. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to q\bar qWZ\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: reconstruction efficiency (in %) in the signal region SR0b5j. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$ production and $\tilde b_1\to tW\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: signal acceptance (in %) in the signal region SR1b. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde b_1\tilde b_1^*$ production and $\tilde b_1\to tW\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: reconstruction efficiency (in %) in the signal region SR1b. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: signal acceptance (in %) in the signal region SR3b. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
SUSY scenario with $\tilde g\tilde g$ production and $\tilde g\to t\bar t\tilde\chi_1^0$ decay: reconstruction efficiency (in %) in the signal region SR3b. The benchmark scenarios used to set exclusion limits are materialized by black dot markers. Acceptance and efficiency are defined as in appendix A of [JHEP 06 (2014) 124, arXiv: 1403.4853v1 [hep-ex]].
Measurements of the top--antitop quark pair production charge asymmetry in the dilepton channel, characterized by two high-${p}_{\rm{T}}$ leptons (electrons or muons), are presented using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $20.3$ $\textrm{fb}^{-1}$ from $pp$ collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Inclusive and differential measurements as a function of the invariant mass, transverse momentum, and longitudinal boost of the $t\bar{t}$ system are performed both in the full phase space and in a fiducial phase space closely matching the detector acceptance. Two observables are studied: $A^{\ell\ell}_{\textrm{C}}$ based on the selected leptons and $A^{t\bar{t}}_{\textrm{C}}$ based on the reconstructed $t\bar{t}$ final state. The inclusive asymmetries are measured in the full phase space to be $A^{\ell\ell}_{\textrm{C}} = 0.008 \pm 0.006$ and $A^{t\bar{t}}_{\textrm{C}} = 0.021 \pm 0.016$, which are in agreement with the Standard Model predictions of $A^{\ell\ell}_{\textrm{C}} = 0.0064 \pm 0.0003 $ and $A^{t\bar{t}}_{\textrm{C}} = 0.0111 \pm 0.0004$.
Unfolded distribution for the inclusive $\Delta|\eta|$ observable in the fiducial volume.
Unfolded distribution for the inclusive $\Delta|y|$ observable in the fiducial volume.
The leptonic inclusive asymmetry in the fiducial volume.
The leptonic asymmetry dependence on the invariant mass of top-antitop system ($m_{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
The leptonic asymmetry dependence on the longitudinal boost of the top-antitop system ($\beta_z^{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
The leptonic asymmetry dependence on the transverse momentum of the top-antitop system ($p_T^{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
The top-antitop inclusive asymmetry in the fiducial volume.
The top-antitop asymmetry dependence on the invariant mass of top-antitop system ($m_{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
The top-antitop asymmetry dependence on the longitudinal boost of the top-antitop system ($\beta_z^{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
The top-antitop asymmetry dependence on the transverse momentum of the top-antitop system ($p_T^{t\bar{t}}$) in the fiducial volume.
A measurement of the production cross section for two isolated photons in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV is presented. The results are based on an integrated luminosity of 20.2 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurement considers photons with pseudorapidities satisfying $|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$ or ${1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37}$ and transverse energies of respectively $E_{\mathrm{T,1}}^{\gamma}>40$ GeV and $E_{\mathrm{T,2}}^{\gamma}>30$ GeV for the two leading photons ordered in transverse energy produced in the interaction.The background due to hadronic jets and electrons is subtracted using data-driven techniques. The fiducial cross sections are corrected for detector effects and measured differentially as a function of six kinematic observables. The measured cross section integrated within the fiducial volume is $16.8 \pm 0.8$ pb. The data are compared to fixed-order QCD calculations at next-to-leading-order and next-to-next-to-leading-order accuracy as well as next-to-leading-order computations including resummation of initial-state gluon radiation at next-to-next-to-leading logarithm or matched to a parton shower, with relative uncertainties varying from 5% to 20%.
The measured fiducial (total xs).
The measured differential as a function of Mgg.
The measured differential as a function of pTgg.
The measured differential as a function of aT.
The measured differential as a function of phiStarEta.
The measured differential as a function of abs(cosThetaStarEta).
The measured differential as a function of deltaPhi.
Differential cross-section measurements are presented for the electroweak production of two jets in association with a $Z$ boson. These measurements are sensitive to the vector-boson fusion production mechanism and provide a fundamental test of the gauge structure of the Standard Model. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collision data collected by ATLAS at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV and with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The differential cross-sections are measured in the $Z\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-$ decay channel ($\ell=e,\mu$) as a function of four observables: the dijet invariant mass, the rapidity interval spanned by the two jets, the signed azimuthal angle between the two jets, and the transverse momentum of the dilepton pair. The data are corrected for the effects of detector inefficiency and resolution and are sufficiently precise to distinguish between different state-of-the-art theoretical predictions calculated using Powheg+Pythia8, Herwig7+Vbfnlo and Sherpa 2.2. The differential cross-sections are used to search for anomalous weak-boson self-interactions using a dimension-six effective field theory. The differential cross-section as a function of the signed azimuthal angle between the two jets is found to be particularly sensitive to the interference between the Standard Model and dimension-six scattering amplitudes and provides a direct test of charge-conjugation and parity invariance in the weak-boson self-interactions.
Differential cross-sections for EW $Zjj$ production as a function of $m_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties. The statistical uncertainty is correlated across bins according to the statistical cross correlation matrix presented in Table 21.
Differential cross-sections for EW $Zjj$ production as a function of $|\Delta y_{jj}|$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties. The statistical uncertainty is correlated across bins according to the statistical cross correlation matrix presented in Table 21.
Differential cross-sections for EW $Zjj$ production as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T},\ell\ell}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties. The statistical uncertainty is correlated across bins according to the statistical cross correlation matrix presented in Table 21.
Differential cross-sections for EW $Zjj$ production as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties. The statistical uncertainty is correlated across bins according to the statistical cross correlation matrix presented in Table 21.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in the EW $Zjj$ signal region ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets}=0$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $m_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in the EW $Zjj$ signal region ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets}=0$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta y_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in the EW $Zjj$ signal region ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets}=0$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T},\ell\ell}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in the EW $Zjj$ signal region ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets}=0$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRa ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $m_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRa ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta y_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRa ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T},\ell\ell}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRa ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRb ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $m_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRb ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta y_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRb ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T},\ell\ell}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRb ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} \geq 1$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRc ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} = 0$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $m_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRc ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} = 0$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta y_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRc ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} = 0$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T},\ell\ell}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Differential cross-sections for inclusive $Zjj$ production in control region CRc ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} = 0$, $\xi_Z > 0.5$) as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ with breakdown of associated uncertainties.
Statistical correlation between bins of the differential cross-section measurements of EW $Zjj$ production in the signal region ($N^\mathrm{gap}_\mathrm{jets} = 0$, $\xi_Z < 0.5$). The associated measured central values, statistical uncertainty magnitude and bin ranges are presented in Tables 1-4. The bins are presented in order such that for example mjj_bin_1 spans $m_{jj} \in (1000,1500)$ GeV (see Table 1), while pT_ll_bin7 spans $p_\mathrm{T}^{ll} \in (200,275)$ GeV (see Table 3).
Characteristics of multi-particle production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=7 TeV are studied as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity, $N_{ch}$. The produced particles are separated into two classes: those belonging to jets and those belonging to the underlying event. Charged particles are measured with pseudorapidity |η|<2.4 and transverse momentum $p_T$ > 0.25 GeV/c. Jets are reconstructed from charged-particles only and required to have $p_T$ > 5 GeV/c. The distributions of jet $p_T$, average $p_T$ of charged particles belonging to the underlying event or to jets, jet rates, and jet shapes are presented as functions of $N_{ch}$ and compared to the predictions of the PYTHIA and HERWIG event generators. Predictions without multi-parton interactions fail completely to describe the $N_{ch}$-dependence observed in the data. For increasing $N_{ch}$, PYTHIA systematically predicts higher jet rates and harder $p_T$ spectra than seen in the data, whereas HERWIG shows the opposite trends. At the highest multiplicity, the data–model agreement is worse for most observables, indicating the need for further tuning and/or new model ingredients.
Mean $p_T$, all charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, UE charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, in-jet charged particles.
Mean $p_T$, leading in-jet charged particle.
Mean $p_T$, charged particle jets, $p^{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 30$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.
Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.
Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.
Measurements are made of differential cross-sections of highly boosted pair-produced top quarks as a function of top-quark and $t\bar{t}$ system kinematic observables using proton--proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of $36.1$ fb$^{-1}$, recorded in 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Events with two large-radius jets in the final state, one with transverse momentum $p_{\rm T} > 500$ GeV and a second with $p_{\rm T}>350$ GeV, are used for the measurement. The top-quark candidates are separated from the multijet background using jet substructure information and association with a $b$-tagged jet. The measured spectra are corrected for detector effects to a particle-level fiducial phase space and a parton-level limited phase space, and are compared to several Monte Carlo simulations by means of calculated $\chi^2$ values. The cross-section for $t\bar{t}$ production in the fiducial phase-space region is $292 \pm 7 \ \rm{(stat)} \pm 76 \rm{(syst)}$ fb, to be compared to the theoretical prediction of $384 \pm 36$ fb.
inclusive absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,1}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,1}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t,2}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$p_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\chi^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$\Delta \phi(t_{1}, t_{2})$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
$|\cos\theta^{*}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at particle level
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section of all 13 variables at particle level. The observables are arranged as follows: leading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ [bins 1-8], leading top rapidity - $|y^{t,1}|$ [bins 9-14], subleading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ [bins 15-21], subleading top rapidity - $|y^{t,2}|$ [bins 22-27], ttbar mass - $m^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 28-37], ttbar pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 38-43], ttbar rapidity - $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 44-49], chi ttbar - ${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 50-56], delta phi ttbar - ${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ [bins 57-60], ttbar out of plane momentum - $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 61-67], yboost ttbar - $|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [68-74], cos theta star - $|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ [bins 75-80], HT ttbar - $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 81-87].
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section of all 13 variables at particle level. The observables are arranged as follows: leading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ [bins 1-8], leading top rapidity - $|y^{t,1}|$ [bins 9-14], subleading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ [bins 15-21], subleading top rapidity - $|y^{t,2}|$ [bins 22-27], ttbar mass - $m^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 28-37], ttbar pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 38-43], ttbar rapidity - $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 44-49], chi ttbar - ${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 50-56], delta phi ttbar - ${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ [bins 57-60], ttbar out of plane momentum - $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 61-67], yboost ttbar - $|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [68-74], cos theta star - $|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ [bins 75-80], HT ttbar - $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 81-87].
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|y^{t}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|y^{t,1}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${H_{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ absolute differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|y^{t}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|y^{t,1}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ normalized differential cross-section at parton level. The parton level phase-space is limited to the region $p_T^{t,1} > 500~$GeV, $p_T^{t,2} > 350~$GeV.
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section in parton level
$|y^{t}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section in parton level
$|y^{t}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t,1}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t,1}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t,1}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|y^{t,1}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t,2}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$m^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{y_{B}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{p_{out}}^{t\bar{t}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section at parton level
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
$|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section at parton level
Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section of all 15 variables at parton level. The observables are arranged as follows: random top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ [bins 1-8], random top rapidity - $|y^{t}|$ [bins 9-16], leading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ [bins 17-24], leading top rapidity - $|y^{t,1}|$ [bins 25-32], subleading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ [bins 33-39], subleading top rapidity - $|y^{t,2}|$ [bins 40-46], ttbar mass - $m^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 48-57], ttbar pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 58-63], ttbar rapidity - $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 66-71], chi ttbar ${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ - [bins 74-80], delta phi ttbar - ${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ [bins 81-84], ttbar out of plane momentum - $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 85-91], yboost ttbar - $|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [92-98], cos theta star - $|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ [bins 99-104], HT ttbar $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 105-114].
Statistical correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross-section of all 15 variables at parton level. The observables are arranged as follows: random top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t}$ [bins 1-8], random top rapidity - $|y^{t}|$ [bins 9-16], leading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,1}$ [bins 17-24], leading top rapidity - $|y^{t,1}|$ [bins 25-32], subleading top pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t,2}$ [bins 33-39], subleading top rapidity - $|y^{t,2}|$ [bins 40-46], ttbar mass - $m^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 48-57], ttbar pT - ${p_{{T}}}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 58-63], ttbar rapidity - $|y^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 66-71], chi ttbar ${\chi}^{t\bar{t}}$ - [bins 74-80], delta phi ttbar - ${\Delta\phi}(t_1,t_2)$ [bins 81-84], ttbar out of plane momentum - $|p_{out}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [bins 85-91],yboost ttbar - $|y_{B}^{t\bar{t}}|$ [92-98], cos theta star - $|{\cos{\theta}^{\star}}|$ [bins 99-104], HT ttbar $H_{T}^{t\bar{t}}$ [bins 105-114].
A measurement is presented of differential cross sections for $t$-channel single top quark and antiquark production in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC. From a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, events containing one muon or electron and two or three jets are analysed. The cross section is measured as a function of the top quark transverse momentum ($p_\mathrm{T}$), rapidity, and polarisation angle, the charged lepton $p_\mathrm{T}$ and rapidity, and the $p_\mathrm{T}$ of the W boson from the top quark decay. In addition, the charge ratio is measured differentially as a function of the top quark, charged lepton, and W boson kinematic observables. The results are found to be in agreement with standard model predictions using various next-to-leading-order event generators and sets of parton distribution functions. Additionally, the spin asymmetry, sensitive to the top quark polarisation, is determined from the differential distribution of the polarisation angle at parton level to be 0.440 $\pm$ 0.070, in agreement with the standard model prediction.
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential absolute cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the parton-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Covariance of the differential normalised cross section as a function of the particle-level cosine of the top quark polarisation angle
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level top quark rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the parton-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level top quark rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton $p_\textrm{T}$
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level charged lepton rapidity
Differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Covariance of the differential charge ratio as a function of the particle-level W boson $p_\textrm{T}$
Top quark spin asymmetry at the parton level in the muon and electron channel and their combination
Fiducial and differential measurements of $W^+W^-$ production in events with at least one hadronic jet are presented. These cross-section measurements are sensitive to the properties of electroweak-boson self-interactions and provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics and the electroweak theory. The analysis is performed using proton$-$proton collision data collected at $\sqrt{s}=13~$TeV with the ATLAS experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139$~$fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected with exactly one oppositely charged electron$-$muon pair and at least one hadronic jet with a transverse momentum of $p_{\mathrm{T}}>30~$GeV and a pseudorapidity of $|\eta|<4.5$. After subtracting the background contributions and correcting for detector effects, the jet-inclusive $W^+W^-+\ge 1~$jet fiducial cross-section and $W^+W^-+$ jets differential cross-sections with respect to several kinematic variables are measured, thus probing a previously unexplored event topology at the LHC. These measurements include leptonic quantities, such as the lepton transverse momenta and the transverse mass of the $W^+W^-$ system, as well as jet-related observables such as the leading jet transverse momentum and the jet multiplicity. Limits on anomalous triple-gauge-boson couplings are obtained in a phase space where interference between the Standard Model amplitude and the anomalous amplitude is enhanced.
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 1168 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 609 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 1485 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $H_{\mathrm{T}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 2969 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $H_{\mathrm{T}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $H_{\mathrm{T}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $S_{\mathrm{T}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 3296 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $S_{\mathrm{T}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $S_{\mathrm{T}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $m_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 4130 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 3519 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{e\mu}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{e\mu}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 1067 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T},e\mu}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $y_{e\mu}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $y_{e\mu}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $y_{e\mu}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $\cos\theta^*$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\cos\theta^*$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\cos\theta^*$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $n_{\mathrm{jet}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The largest observed value is 3519 GeV.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{e\mu}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $m_{e\mu}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(e,\mu)$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $\Delta\phi(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta\phi(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $\Delta R(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta R(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $\Delta R(\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}, \mathrm{lead.~jet})$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}}$
Measured fiducial cross section for $pp\rightarrow W^+W^-$+jets production for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$ for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~lep.}} > 200$ GeV. The second column contains the results obtained with a fiducial particle phase space that includes a veto on $b$-jets. This alternative result is obtained from the nominal result by the application of bin-wise correction that is calculated as the ratio of the predicted differential cross-section in the nominal analysis phase space and the predicted cross-section for a phase space that includes a veto on events with $b$-jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 20$ GeV. Also shown are the Standard Model predictions for $q\bar{q} \rightarrow WW$, obtained from Sherpa 2.2.2, MadGraph 2.3.3 + Pythia 8.212 using FxFx merging, and Powheg MiNLO + Pythia 8.244. These predictions are supplemented by the Sherpa 2.2.2 + OpenLoops simulation of $gg\rightarrow WW$. Finally, the prediction from MATRIX is given, which includes nNLO QCD and NLO EW corrections to $WW$+jet production. The largest observed value is 19.6.
Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$
Correlation matrix of the total uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{sub-lead.~lep.}} / p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{lead.~jet}}$
The event-by-event correlations between three flow amplitudes are measured for the first time in Pb--Pb collisions, using higher-order Symmetric Cumulants. We find that different three-harmonic correlations develop during the collective evolution of the medium, when compared with correlations that exist in the initial state. These new results cannot be interpreted in terms of previous lower-order flow measurements, since contributions from two-harmonic correlations are explicitly removed in the new observables. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations provides new and independent constraints for the initial conditions and system properties of nuclear matter created in heavy-ion collisions.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(2,4,6)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm SC}(3,4,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,4)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Centrality dependence of ${\rm NSC}(2,3,5)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$~TeV.
Measurements of the inclusive J/$\psi$ yield as a function of charged-particle pseudorapidity density ${\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/\rm{d}\eta$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with ALICE at the LHC are reported. The J/$\psi$ meson yield is measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.9$) in the dielectron channel, for events selected based on the charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity ($|\eta|<1$) and at forward rapidity ($-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8<\eta<5.1$); both observables are normalized to their corresponding averages in minimum bias events. The increase of the normalized J/$\psi$ yield with normalized ${\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/\rm{d}\eta$ is significantly stronger than linear and dependent on the transverse momentum. The data are compared to theoretical predictions, which describe the observed trends well, albeit not always quantitatively.
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ integrated, event selection SPD
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ integrated, event selection V0
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ 0-4 and 4-8 GeV/c, event selection SPD
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ 8-15 and 15-40 GeV/c, event selection SPD
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ 0-4 and 4-8 GeV/c, event selection V0
$N_{J/psi}/<N_{J/\psi}> / N_{ch}/<N_{ch}>$, $|y^{J/\psi}|<0.9$, $p_{T}^{J/\psi}$ 8-15 and 15-40 GeV/c, event selection V0
Jet charge is an estimator of the electric charge of a quark, antiquark, or gluon initiating a jet. It is based on the momentum-weighted sum of the electric charges of the jet constituents. Measurements of three charge observables of the leading jet in transverse momentum pT are performed with dijet events. The analysis is carried out with data collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 inverse femtobarns. The results are presented as a function of the pT of the leading jet and compared to predictions from leading- and next-to-leading-order event generators combined with parton showers. Measured jet charge distributions, unfolded for detector effects, are reported, which expand on previous measurements of the jet charge average and standard deviation in pp collisions.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=1.0)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.3)$ of leading jet with pT > 400 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_L (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 400 < pT < 700 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 700 < pT < 1000 GeV.
Covariance matrix of jetcharge $Q_T (\kappa=0.6)$ of leading jet with 1000 < pT < 1800 GeV.
Cross sections for the production of a Z boson in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of sqrt(s) = 8 TeV are measured using a data sample collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC corresponding to 19.6 inverse femtobarns. Differential cross sections are presented as functions of up to three observables that describe the jet kinematics and the jet activity. Correlations between the azimuthal directions and the rapidities of the jets and the Z boson are studied in detail. The predictions of a number of multileg generators with leading or next-to-leading order accuracy are compared with the measurements. The comparison shows the importance of including multi-parton contributions in the matrix elements and the improvement in the predictions when next-to-leading order terms are included.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the exclusive jet multiplicity, $N_{\text{jets}}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_4)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $p_{\text{T}}$, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{j}_5)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 1$^\text{st}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_1)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 2$^\text{nd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_2)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 3$^\text{rd}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_3)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 4$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_4)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the 5$^\text{th}$ jet $|y|$, $|y(\text{j}_5)|$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$, for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least one jet and $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the Z boson $|y|$, $|y(\text{Z})|$ for events with at least $p_\text{T}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{diff}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{diff}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{j}_1, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_1)$ for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z}) > 300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_2)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$leading jet, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{j}_3)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the $y_{\text{sum}}$ of the Z boson and the system constituted of the two leading jets, $y_{\text{sum}}(\text{Z}, \text{dijet})$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least four jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of $H_\text{T}$ for events with at least five jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least ine jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least ine jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least two jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^\text{nd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^\text{rd}$ leading jet for events with at least three jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet$\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least one jet.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least two jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV and at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_3)$, for events with $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z boson and the 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jet, $\Delta\Phi(\text{Z},\text{j}_1)$, for events with at least three jets, $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and $H_{\text{T}}>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_2,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>150\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 2$^{\text{nd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_2)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 1$^{\text{st}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the azimuthal angle between the 2$^{\text{nd}}$ and 3$^{\text{rd}}$ leading jets, $\Delta\Phi(\text{j}_1,\text{j}_3)$, for events with at least three jets and $p_{\text{T}}(\text{Z})>300\,$GeV.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$, and breakdown of the relative uncertainty.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production measured as a function of the mass of the system made of the two leading jets, $m_{\text{j}_1\text{j}_1}$.
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the Z boson and leading jet rapidities
The cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
Bin-to-bin correlation in the the cross section for Z($\rightarrow\ell\ell$) + jets production as a function of the rapidities of the Z boson and leading jet, and of the transverse momentum of the jet for the same configuration.
A search for new phenomena in final states characterized by high jet multiplicity, an isolated lepton (electron or muon) and either zero or at least three $b$-tagged jets is presented. The search uses 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016. The dominant sources of background are estimated using parameterized extrapolations, based on observables at medium jet multiplicity, to predict the $b$-tagged jet multiplicity distribution at the higher jet multiplicities used in the search. No significant excess over the Standard Model expectation is observed and 95% confidence-level limits are extracted constraining four simplified models of $R$-parity-violating supersymmetry that feature either gluino or top-squark pair production. The exclusion limits reach as high as 2.1 TeV in gluino mass and 1.2 TeV in top-squark mass in the models considered. In addition, an upper limit is set on the cross-section for Standard Model $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ production of 60 fb (6.5 $\times$ the Standard Model prediction) at 95% confidence level. Finally, model-independent limits are set on the contribution from new phenomena to the signal-region yields.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eleven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eleven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eleven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with twelve-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with twelve-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with twelve-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where the gluino decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and the neutralino, which then decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and a lepton via a lambda' RPV coupling, where each RPV decay can produce any of the four first and second generation leptons (e, mu, nu_e, nu_mu) with equal probability (m_gluino = 1800 GeV, m_neutralino = 900 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where the gluino decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and the neutralino, which then decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and a lepton via a lambda' RPV coupling, where each RPV decay can produce any of the four first and second generation leptons (e, mu, nu_e, nu_mu) with equal probability (m_gluino = 1800 GeV, m_neutralino = 900 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where the gluino decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and the neutralino, which then decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and a lepton via a lambda' RPV coupling, where each RPV decay can produce any of the four first and second generation leptons (e, mu, nu_e, nu_mu) with equal probability (m_gluino = 1800 GeV, m_neutralino = 900 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s- and a b- quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling (m_gluino = 1600 GeV, m_stop = 1000 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s- and a b- quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling (m_gluino = 1600 GeV, m_stop = 1000 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s- and a b- quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling (m_gluino = 1600 GeV, m_stop = 1000 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays via an off-shell top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino -> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112 (m_gluino = 2000 GeV, m_neutralino = 941 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays via an off-shell top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino -> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112 (m_gluino = 2000 GeV, m_neutralino = 941 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays via an off-shell top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino -> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112 (m_gluino = 2000 GeV, m_neutralino = 941 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of right-handed top squark pair production with the top squark decaying to the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) which is considered to be purely higgsino. The higgsino-like LSP decays through the non-zero RPV coupling lambda''_323 (m_stop = 975 GeV, m_neutralino = 600 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of right-handed top squark pair production with the top squark decaying to the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) which is considered to be purely higgsino. The higgsino-like LSP decays through the non-zero RPV coupling lambda''_323 (m_stop = 975 GeV, m_neutralino = 600 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
Cut flow for a model of right-handed top squark pair production with the top squark decaying to the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) which is considered to be purely higgsino. The higgsino-like LSP decays through the non-zero RPV coupling lambda''_323 (m_stop = 975 GeV, m_neutralino = 600 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.
The production cross-sections for $W^{\pm}$ and $Z$ bosons are measured using ATLAS data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.0 pb$^{-1}$ collected at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV. The decay channels $W \rightarrow \ell \nu$ and $Z \rightarrow \ell \ell $ are used, where $\ell$ can be an electron or a muon. The cross-sections are presented for a fiducial region defined by the detector acceptance and are also extrapolated to the full phase space for the total inclusive production cross-section. The combined (average) total inclusive cross-sections for the electron and muon channels are: \begin{eqnarray} \sigma^{\text{tot}}_{W^{+}\rightarrow \ell \nu}& = & 2312 \pm 26\ (\text{stat.})\ \pm 27\ (\text{syst.}) \pm 72\ (\text{lumi.}) \pm 30\ (\text{extr.})\text{pb} \nonumber, \\ \sigma^{\text{tot}}_{W^{-}\rightarrow \ell \nu}& = & 1399 \pm 21\ (\text{stat.})\ \pm 17\ (\text{syst.}) \pm 43\ (\text{lumi.}) \pm 21\ (\text{extr.})\text{pb} \nonumber, \\ \sigma^{\text{tot}}_{Z \rightarrow \ell \ell}& = & 323.4 \pm 9.8\ (\text{stat.}) \pm 5.0\ (\text{syst.}) \pm 10.0\ (\text{lumi.}) \pm 5.5 (\text{extr.}) \text{pb} \nonumber. \end{eqnarray} Measured ratios and asymmetries constructed using these cross-sections are also presented. These observables benefit from full or partial cancellation of many systematic uncertainties that are correlated between the different measurements.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> e+ nu final state.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> mu+ nu final state.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> e- nu final state.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nu final state.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+ e- final state.
Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> e+ nu final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> mu+ nu final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> e- nu final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nu final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+ e- final state.
Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.
Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W+ boson production in the W+ -> l+ nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W- boson production in the W- -> l- nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for W boson production in the W -> l nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined fiducial cross-section measurements for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> l- l+ (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined total cross-section measurements for W+ boson production in the W+ -> l+ nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined total cross-section measurements for W- boson production in the W- -> l- nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined total cross-section measurements for W boson production in the W -> l nu (l = e, mu) final state.
Combined total cross-section measurements for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> l- l+ (l = e, mu) final state.
Measured fiducial cross-section ratio R_{W+-/Z} = sigma (W+/- -> l+/- nu/nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where l = e, mu.
Measured fiducial cross-section ratio R_{W+/W-} = sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) / sigma (W- -> l- nubar) where l = e, mu.
Measured charge asymmetry in W-boson production A_{l} = ( sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) - sigma (W- -> l- nubar) ) / ( sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) + sigma (W- -> l- nubar) ) where l = e, mu.
The ratio of measured W+ cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W+} = sigma (W+ -> e+ nu) / sigma (W+ -> mu+ nu)
The ratio of measured W- cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W-} = sigma (W- -> e- nu) / sigma (W- -> mu- nu)
The ratio of measured W cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{W} = sigma (W -> e nu) / sigma (W -> mu nu)
The ratio of measured Z/gamma^* cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels R_{Z/gamma^*} = sigma (Z/gamma^* -> e+ e-) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> mu+ mu-)
Correlation coefficients among (W- -> l- nubar), (W+ -> l+ nu), (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where (l = e, mu) excluding the common normalisation uncertainty due to the luminosity calibration.
The measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections of the Higgs boson decaying to a pair of photons are presented. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collisions data recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross section is measured to be $\sigma_\mathrm{fid}$ = 73.4 $_{-5.3}^{+5.4}$ (stat) ${}_{-2.2}^{+2.4}$ (syst) fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of 75.4 $\pm$ 4.1 fb. The measurements are also performed in fiducial regions targeting different production modes and as function of several observables describing the diphoton system, the number of additional jets present in the event, and other kinematic observables. Two double differential measurements are performed. No significant deviations from the standard model expectations are observed.
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\cos\theta^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{\gamma\gamma}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{1}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta y_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|y^{j_{2}}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\bar{\eta}_{j_{1},j_{2}}-\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $m_{\mathrm{jj}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\eta_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{leptons}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $n_{\mathrm{b-jets}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{j_{2}}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{\gamma\gamma,j_{1}j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$ in the VBF enriched PS
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $|\Delta\phi_{j_{1},j_{2}}|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ in the VBF enriched PS. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $\left|\phi_{\eta}^{\ast}\right|$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{C}}^{j}$
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Differential fiducial higgs to diphoton cross section with respect to $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ vs. $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$. The last bin in the differential observable extends to infinity and the measured fiducial cross section in this bin is devided by the given bin width
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
Correlation between the measured fiducial cross sections in the different bins of $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma}$ and $n_{\mathrm{jets}}$
We report measurements of spin correlations and analyzing powers in He→3(p→, 2p) and He→3(p→, pn) quasielastic scattering as a function of momentum transfer and missing momentum at 197 MeV using a polarized internal target at the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility Cooler Ring. At sufficiently high momentum transfer we find He→3(p→, pn) spin observables are in good agreement with free p−n scattering observables, and therefore that He→3 can serve as a good polarized neutron target. The extracted polarizations of nucleons in He→3 at low missing momentum are consistent with Faddeev calculations.
QUASIELASTIC SCATTERING.
Measurements of the associated production of a Z boson with at least one jet originating from a b quark in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV are presented. Differential cross sections are measured with data collected by the CMS experiment corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.8 inverse femtobarns. Z bosons are reconstructed through their decays to electrons and muons. Cross sections are measured as a function of observables characterizing the kinematics of the b jet and the Z boson. Ratios of differential cross sections for the associated production with at least one b jet to the associated production with any jet are also presented. The production of a Z boson with two b jets is investigated, and differential cross sections are measured for the dijet system. Results are compared to theoretical predictions, testing two different flavour schemes for the choice of initial-state partons.
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the leading b jet pT
Cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the leading b/inclusive (j) jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the leading b jet |eta|
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the leading b/inclusive (j) jet |eta|
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of the Z boson pT
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of the Z boson pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of HT
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of HT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(1b) production as a function of DeltaPhi(Zb)
cross section ratio for Z(1b) and Z+jets production as a function of DeltaPhi(Zb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the leading b jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the subleading b jet pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the Z boson pT
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the invari- ant mass of the b jet pair, Mbb
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of the invari- ant mass of the Zbb system, MZbb
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of DeltaPhi(bb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of DeltaR(bb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of minimum DeltaR(Zb)
Differential fiducial cross section for Z(2b) production as a function of AZbb
fiducial cross section, for a single lepton type, for the production of Z(1b) and Z(2b) events
An observation of electroweak $W^{\pm}Z$ production in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions is presented. The data collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2015 and 2016 at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. Events containing three identified leptons, either electrons or muons, and two jets are selected. The electroweak production of $W^{\pm}Z$ bosons in association with two jets is measured with an observed significance of 5.3 standard deviations. A fiducial cross-section for electroweak production including interference effects is measured to be $\sigma_{WZjj\mathrm{-EW}} = 0.57 \; ^{+ 0.14} _{- 0.13} \,(\mathrm{stat.}) \; ^{+ 0.07} _{- 0.06} \,(\mathrm{syst.}) \; \mathrm{fb}$. Total and differential fiducial cross-sections of the sum of $W^\pm Z jj$ electroweak and strong productions for several kinematic observables are also measured.
Fiducial cross section of the electroweak $W^{\pm}Z$ boson pair production in association with two jets. The first systematic uncertainty is experimental, the second is the theory modelling and interference systematics and the third one is the luminosity uncertainty.
Fiducial cross section of the $W^{\pm}Z$ boson pair production in association with two jets. The first systematic uncertainty is experimental, the second is the theory modelling and interference systematics and the third one is the luminosity uncertainty.
Numbers of observed and expected events in the $W^{\pm}Zjj$ signal region and in the three control regions, before the fit. The expected number of $WZjj-EW$ events from $SHERPA$ and the estimated number of background events from the other processes are shown. The sum of the background containing misidentified leptons is labelled "Misid. leptons". The total uncertainties are quoted.
Summary of the relative uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section $\sigma^{\mathrm{fid}}_{W^\pm Z j j-EW}$ . The uncertainties are reported as percentages.
Numbers of observed and expected events in the $W^{\pm}Zjj$ signal region and in the three control regions, after the fit. The expected number of $WZjj-EW$ events from $SHERPA$ and the estimated number of background events from the other processes are shown. The sum of the background containing misidentified leptons is labelled "Misid. leptons". The total correlated post-fit uncertainties are quoted.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. The last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. The last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. The last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. The last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. The last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
Measured $W^{pm}Zjj$ differential cross-section in the VBS fiducial phase space. The relative uncertainties are reported as percentages. The systematic uncertainties are in order of appearance: total uncorrelated systematic and correlated systematics related respectively to unfolding, electrons, muons, jets, reducible and irreducible backgrounds, pileup and luminosity. the last bin is a cross section for all events above the lower end of the bin.
Correlation matrix for the unfolded fiducial cross-section.
A search for heavy charged long-lived particles is performed using a data sample of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The search is based on observables related to ionization energy loss and time of flight, which are sensitive to the velocity of heavy charged particles traveling significantly slower than the speed of light. Multiple search strategies for a wide range of lifetimes, corresponding to path lengths of a few meters, are defined as model-independently as possible, by referencing several representative physics cases that yield long-lived particles within supersymmetric models, such as gluinos/squarks ($R$-hadrons), charginos and staus. No significant deviations from the expected Standard Model background are observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are provided on the production cross sections of long-lived $R$-hadrons as well as directly pair-produced staus and charginos. These results translate into lower limits on the masses of long-lived gluino, sbottom and stop $R$-hadrons, as well as staus and charginos of 2000 GeV, 1250 GeV, 1340 GeV, 430 GeV and 1090 GeV, respectively.
Lower mass requirement for signal regions.
Lower mass requirement for signal regions.
Lower mass requirement for signal regions.
Lower mass requirement for signal regions.
Expected and observed events in the 16 discovery regions along with the according control regions.
Expected and observed events in the 16 discovery regions along with the according control regions.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector R-hadron search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector R-hadron search.
p0-values and model-independent upper limits on cross-section x acceptance x efficiency for the 16 discovery regions.
p0-values and model-independent upper limits on cross-section x acceptance x efficiency for the 16 discovery regions.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic search for metastable gluino R-hadrons.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic search for metastable gluino R-hadrons.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector direct-stau search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector direct-stau search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector chargino search.
Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector chargino search.
Upper cross-section limit in gluino R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in gluino R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in sbottom R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in sbottom R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in stop R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in stop R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in stau search.
Upper cross-section limit in stau search.
Upper cross-section limit in chargino search.
Upper cross-section limit in chargino search.
Lower mass limit as function of gluino lifetime.
Lower mass limit as function of gluino lifetime.
Acceptance x efficiency, acceptance and efficiency for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.
Acceptance x efficiency, acceptance and efficiency for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in meta-stable gluino R-hadron search.
Upper cross-section limit in meta-stable gluino R-hadron search.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.
ETmiss trigger efficiency as function of true ETmiss (EtmissTurnOn).
ETmiss trigger efficiency as function of true ETmiss (EtmissTurnOn).
Single-muon trigger efficiency as function of $|\eta|$ and $\beta$ (SingleMuTurnOn).
Single-muon trigger efficiency as function of $|\eta|$ and $\beta$ (SingleMuTurnOn).
Candidate reconstruction efficiency for ID+Calo selection (IDCaloEff).
Candidate reconstruction efficiency for ID+Calo selection (IDCaloEff).
Candidate reconstruction efficiency for loose selection (LooseEff).
Candidate reconstruction efficiency for loose selection (LooseEff).
Efficiency for a loose candidate to be promoted to a tight candidate (TightPromotionEff).
Efficiency for a loose candidate to be promoted to a tight candidate (TightPromotionEff).
Resolution and average of reconstructed dE/dx mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.
Resolution and average of reconstructed dE/dx mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.
Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.
Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.
Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for FullDet candidates.
Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for FullDet candidates.
The prevalence of hadronic jets at the LHC requires that a deep understanding of jet formation and structure is achieved in order to reach the highest levels of experimental and theoretical precision. There have been many measurements of jet substructure at the LHC and previous colliders, but the targeted observables mix physical effects from various origins. Based on a recent proposal to factorize physical effects, this Letter presents a double-differential cross-section measurement of the Lund jet plane using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector using jets with transverse momentum above 675 GeV. The measurement uses charged particles to achieve a fine angular resolution and is corrected for acceptance and detector effects. Several parton shower Monte Carlo models are compared with the data. No single model is found to be in agreement with the measured data across the entire plane.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for use in MC tuning.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 0.33.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 0.67.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.00.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.33.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.67.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.00.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.33.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.67.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.00.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.33.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.67.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 4.00.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 4.33.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.69 < ln(1/z) < 0.97.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.97 < ln(1/z) < 1.25.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.25 < ln(1/z) < 1.52.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.52 < ln(1/z) < 1.80.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.80 < ln(1/z) < 2.08.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.08 < ln(1/z) < 2.36.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.36 < ln(1/z) < 2.63.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.63 < ln(1/z) < 2.91.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.91 < ln(1/z) < 3.19.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.19 < ln(1/z) < 3.47.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.47 < ln(1/z) < 3.74.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.74 < ln(1/z) < 4.02.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.02 < ln(1/z) < 4.30.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.30 < ln(1/z) < 4.57.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.57 < ln(1/z) < 4.85.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.85 < ln(1/z) < 5.13.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.13 < ln(1/z) < 5.41.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.41 < ln(1/z) < 5.68.
Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.68 < ln(1/z) < 5.96.
The summed covariance matrix of all systematic and statistical uncertainties associated with the measurement in bins of $\ln{(1/z)} \times \ln{(R/\Delta R)}$.
The summed covariance matrix of all statistical uncertainties associated with the measurement in bins of $\ln{(1/z)} \times \ln{(R/\Delta R)}$.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.